IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aolpei/167100.html

The Russian Federation – Specifics of the Sugar Market

Author

Listed:
  • Smutka, L.
  • Maitah, Mansoor
  • Zhuravleva, E. A.

Abstract

The Russian Federation represents a significant force in the global production and consumption of beet sugar. Its population which is in excess of more than 140 million people consumes over 5.6 million net tons of sugar annually, and the amount is steadily growing. The Russian sugar industry was unable to meet the domestic demand, especially during the economic transformation period (sugar beet and sugar production are very sensitive in relation to changes in economic, political, production and consumption environment (Špička, Janotová, 2013), and Russia has thus become heavily dependent on imports of both refined and raw sugar. After a long period of stagnation the Russian Federation has over the past decade focused on promoting plans for restoring the production capacities of both the sugar beet growing and sugar manufacture. The government programme promoted at both the federal and regional levels has very significantly boosted the production potential and reduced Russia’s dependence on imports of sugar. This article aims to identify major trends and directions affecting the development of the Russian sugar industry in the past two decades. From the analysis outlined below it follows that the period of 1992 - 2000 was a very critical time for the Russian sugar industry during which there was a downswing in its cultivation and processing capacities. There was a significant decline not only in the quantitative but also qualitative characteristics of the Russian sugar industry. As a consequence, there has been a fall in competitiveness and a significant increase in import dependency. In the period 2000 - 2012, then was contrary to resuscitate the Russian market and the economy. This was reflected in the growth of sugar beet production, as well as in the growth of its own sugar production. Russia‘s dependence on imports of sugar from abroad dropped significantly and changed the structure of traded goods containing sugar. Due to a series of reforms, and to strengthen the competitiveness of Russian sugar industry, especially in relation to countries with which Russia has signed an agreement on customs union or free trade area.

Suggested Citation

  • Smutka, L. & Maitah, Mansoor & Zhuravleva, E. A., . "The Russian Federation – Specifics of the Sugar Market," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(01), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:167100
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.167100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/167100/files/agris_on-line_2014_1_smutka_maitah_zhuravleva.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.167100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William M. Liefert & Olga Liefert, 2012. "Russian Agriculture during Transition: Performance, Global Impact, and Outlook," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 37-75.
    2. Andrea Zaghini, 2005. "Evolution of trade patterns in the new EU member states," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 13(4), pages 629-658, October.
    3. Peter Rutland, 2013. "Neoliberalism and the Russian transition," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 332-362, April.
    4. Antonio Sanchez-Andres & Cristina Garcia-Testal, 2008. "Post-Soviet studies and the transition: the case of the Russian economy," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 133-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rami Hodrob, 2017. "The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Palestinian Economic Growth," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 550-557.
    2. Daniel Toth & Lenka Kuc rkov, 2017. "Macroeconomic Prognosis of Employment in the Czech Republic," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(4), pages 730-736.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irena BENESOVA & Mansoor MAITAH & Lubos SMUTKA & Karel TOMSIK & Natalia ISHCHUKOVA, 2017. "Perspectives of the Russian agricultural exports in terms of comparative advantage," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(7), pages 318-330.
    2. Svatoš, M. & Smutka, L. & Ishchukova, N. & Vasilyonok, V., . "Russian Agrarian Foreign Trade Development – the Impact of Selected Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(3), pages 1-13.
    3. Andrea Zaghini, 2006. "Commercial Specialisation in the Countries of Central-Eastern Europe," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, July.
    4. Beňo, Michal, . "E-working: Country Versus Culture Dimension," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 13(2).
    5. Peter BIELIK & Luboš SMUTKA & Miroslav SVATOŠ & Daniela HUPKOVÁ, 2013. "Czech and Slovak agricultural foreign trade - two decades after the dissolution," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(10), pages 441-453.
    6. Belova, Anna & Smutka, Lubos & Rosochatecka, Eva & Bazina, A., . "Competitiveness of Domestic Production of Poultry Meat on the EU Market and on the World Market," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(4 Special), pages 1-15.
    7. Svatoš, M. & Maitah, Mansoor & Belova, Anna, . "World Sugar Market – Basic Development Trends and Tendencies," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(2), pages 1-16.
    8. Imre Fertő & Karoly Attila Soos, 2009. "Duration of trade of former communist countries in the EU market," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 31-39.
    9. Ichiro Iwasaki & Taku Suzuki, 2016. "Radicalism Versus Gradualism: An Analytical Survey Of The Transition Strategy Debate," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 807-834, September.
    10. Maximilian Kardung & Kutay Cingiz & Ortwin Costenoble & Roel Delahaye & Wim Heijman & Marko Lovrić & Myrna van Leeuwen & Robert M’Barek & Hans van Meijl & Stephan Piotrowski & Tévécia Ronzon & Johanne, 2021. "Development of the Circular Bioeconomy: Drivers and Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Prud’homme, Dan & Han, Nianchen & McCourt, David & Chacar, Aya, 2025. "Divorce or temporary separation? Lessons from the US’s history of decoupling with China and other nations," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 60(5).
    12. Wadim Strielkowski & Vyacheslav Volchik & Artyom Maskaev & Pavel Savko, 2020. "Leadership and Effective Institutional Economics Design in the Context of Education Reforms," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, April.
    13. Aleksandra Parteka, 2013. "The evolving structure of Polish exports (1994−2010) – diversification of products and trade partners," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 44(5), pages 435-466.
    14. repec:kap:iaecre:v:14:y:2008:i:4:p:355-368 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Miroslav Svatoš & Luboš Smutka, 2012. "Structure and Competitiveness of Mutual Agrarian Trade of Visegrad Countries," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 95-106.
    16. Svatos, Miroslav & Smutka, Lubos, . "Development of Agricultural Trade of Visegrad Group Countries in Relation to EU and Third Countries," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 4(3), pages 1-15.
    17. Benno Ferrarini & Pasquale Scaramozzino, 2013. "Complexity, Specialization, and Growth," ADB Economics Working Paper Series 344, Asian Development Bank.
    18. Ishchukova, N. & Smutka, L., . "Comparative Advantage: Products Mapping of the Russian Agricultural Exports," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12.
    19. Luboš Smutka & Jaroslava Burianová & Anna Belova, 2012. "The comparative advantage of Czech agricultural trade in relation to the most important trade partner countries in the period of 2008-2011," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 60(7), pages 273-288.
    20. eppermann, Andre & Balkovič, Juraj & Bundle, Sophie & Havlík, Petr & Leclère, David & Lesiv, Myroslava & Schepaschenko, Dmitry, "undated". "Crop Production Potentials In Russia And Ukraine – Intensification Versus Cropland Expansion," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260899, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    21. Benjamin Leon Bodirsky & Susanne Rolinski & Anne Biewald & Isabelle Weindl & Alexander Popp & Hermann Lotze-Campen, 2015. "Global Food Demand Scenarios for the 21 st Century," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aolpei:167100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fevszcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.