IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/389112.html

Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Farming Methods on Economic Well-Being between Households Using Indigenous and Conventional Farming Practices in the Midlands of Embu County in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Ngina, Mwenga Miriam
  • Sande, Anne
  • Abucheli, Grace

Abstract

Agriculture is vital to Kenya’s economy, supporting over 80% of rural residents, contributing one-third of GDP, and supplying 65% of export earnings. Despite international and national efforts to promote conventional and sustainable farming, global food insecurity has worsened, with acute hunger rising by 10% to affect 343 million people in 74 countries. Industrial-scale, high-yield agriculture has often destabilized sustainability, causing environmental harm, social inequality, chronic diseases, and increased food insecurity. With the global population expected to reach 10.4 billion by the 2080s, transforming agri-food systems is crucial for resilient food security and economic stability. The reliance on rain-fed agriculture at the Midlands of Embu County in Kenya highlights the need to compare conventional and indigenous farming methods to better understand their economic and environmental effects. The objective of the study was to assess the effect of farming practices used in conventional and Indigenous farming methods on economic well-being. The study adopted the comparative research design and descriptive survey design. The study population comprised of 66,878 farmer households and key informants in the Midlands of Embu County. Data was collected using semi-structured questionnaires, interview schedule and observation check lists. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to summarize results on farming practices while inferential statistical analysis included the use of simple linear regression analysis were used to reveal effect of the farming practices on economic well- being. Farming practice showed statistically significant negative coefficient for the indigenous farm households. The negative coefficient indicates that as the category value of farming practices increases (likely representing poorer practices), income significantly decreases. In the conventional farming practices: The analysis shows that conventional farming practice category has a non-significant effect on Income total (IT). The study recommends implementation of policies that promote sustainable farming, protect small scale farmers and encourage biodiversity conservation. The results obtained will guide adoption of sustainable farming practices, policy reviews and add to the existing knowledge of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ngina, Mwenga Miriam & Sande, Anne & Abucheli, Grace, 2025. "Comparative Analysis of the Effect of Farming Methods on Economic Well-Being between Households Using Indigenous and Conventional Farming Practices in the Midlands of Embu County in Kenya," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(11).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/389112/files/Ngina43112025AJAEES146572.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiffany L. Fess & Vagner A. Benedito, 2018. "Organic versus Conventional Cropping Sustainability: A Comparative System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-42, January.
    2. Custodio, Henry M. & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Bryan, Brett A., 2023. "A review of socioeconomic indicators of sustainability and wellbeing building on the social foundations framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    3. Miguel A. Altieri & Clara I. Nicholls, 2017. "The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 33-45, January.
    4. Ponnusamy, K. & Devi, M.K., 2017. "Impact of Integrated Farming System Approach on Doubling Farmers’ Income," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 30(Conferenc).
    5. Manish Yadav & B. B. Vashisht & S. K. Jalota & T. Jyolsna & Samar Pal Singh & Arun Kumar & Amit Kumar & Gurjeet Singh, 2024. "Improving Water Efficiencies in Rural Agriculture for Sustainability of Water Resources: A Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(10), pages 3505-3526, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mindy Jewell Price & Alex Latta & Andrew Spring & Jennifer Temmer & Carla Johnston & Lloyd Chicot & Jessica Jumbo & Margaret Leishman, 2022. "Agroecology in the North: Centering Indigenous food sovereignty and land stewardship in agriculture “frontiers”," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1191-1206, December.
    2. Aguilera, Eduardo & Díaz-Gaona, Cipriano & García-Laureano, Raquel & Reyes-Palomo, Carolina & Guzmán, Gloria I. & Ortolani, Livia & Sánchez-Rodríguez, Manuel & Rodríguez-Estévez, Vicente, 2020. "Agroecology for adaptation to climate change and resource depletion in the Mediterranean region. A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Baccar, Mariem & Raynal, Hélène & Sekhar, Muddu & Bergez, Jacques-Eric & Willaume, Magali & Casel, Pierre & Giriraj, P. & Murthy, Sanjeeva & Ruiz, Laurent, 2023. "Dynamics of crop category choices reveal strategies and tactics used by smallholder farmers in India to cope with unreliable water availability," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Atanu Mukherjee & Emmanuel C. Omondi & Paul R. Hepperly & Rita Seidel & Wade P. Heller, 2020. "Impacts of Organic and Conventional Management on the Nutritional Level of Vegetables," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Islam, Zeenatul & Sabiha, Noor E & Salim, Ruhul, 2022. "Integrated environment-smart agricultural practices: A strategy towards climate-resilient agriculture," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 59-72.
    6. Max Ajl, 2021. "A People’s Green New Deal: Obstacles and Prospects," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 10(2), pages 371-390, August.
    7. Meine van Noordwijk & Richard Coe & Fergus L. Sinclair & Eike Luedeling & Jules Bayala & Catherine W. Muthuri & Peter Cooper & Roeland Kindt & Lalisa Duguma & Christine Lamanna & Peter A. Minang, 2021. "Climate change adaptation in and through agroforestry: four decades of research initiated by Peter Huxley," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 1-33, June.
    8. Huang, Yihang & Liu, Zhengjia, 2024. "Improving Northeast China’s soybean and maize planting structure through subsidy optimization considering climate change and comparative economic benefit," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    9. Mukhovi, Stellah & Jacobi, Johanna & Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika & Rist, Stephan & Kiteme, Boniface, 2020. "Learning and Adaptation in Food Systems: Insights from Four Case Studies in the Global South," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 11(04), December.
    10. Martínez-Paz, José Miguel & Banos-González, Isabel & Martínez-Fernández, Julia & Esteve-Selma, Miguel Ángel, 2019. "Assessment of management measures for the conservation of traditional irrigated lands: The case of the Huerta of Murcia (Spain)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 382-391.
    11. Anna Savoldelli & Daniele Landi & Caterina Rizzi, 2024. "Exploring Quantitative Methodologies for Assessing the Environmental, Social, and Economic Impacts of Telemedicine: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Yuqian Zhang & Yixuan Wang & Chenchen Su & Jiahong Guo & Chen Xu, 2025. "Assessing the impact of China's National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone policy on agricultural carbon emissions," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(5), pages 242-253.
    13. Alan F. Hamlet & Nima Ehsani & Jennifer L. Tank & Zachariah Silver & Kyuhyun Byun & Ursula H. Mahl & Shannon L. Speir & Matt T. Trentman & Todd V. Royer, 2024. "Effects of climate and winter cover crops on nutrient loss in agricultural watersheds in the midwestern U.S," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Sahoo, Dukhabandhu & Mohanty, Pritisudha & Mishra, Surbhi & Behera, Manash & Mohapatra, Souryabrata, 2024. "Does climate-smart agriculture technology improve the subjective well-being of farmers? Evidence from micro-level data," MPRA Paper 123955, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. P. K. Viswanathan & K. Kavya & Chandra Sekhar Bahinipati, 2020. "Global Patterns of Climate-resilient Agriculture: A Review of Studies and Imperatives for Empirical Research in India," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 25(2), pages 169-192, December.
    16. Petra Benyei & Laura Aceituno-Mata & Joana Blanch-Ramirez & Laura Franco & Laura Levy & Antonio Perdomo-Molina & Laura Calvet-Mir, 2025. "From grains to berries: causes and consequences of crop portfolio changes in four mountain agroecosystems in the Iberian Peninsula," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1267-1283, September.
    17. Sarah S. Wiener & Nora L. Álvarez-Berríos & Angela B. Lindsey, 2020. "Opportunities and Challenges for Hurricane Resilience on Agricultural and Forest Land in the U.S. Southeast and Caribbean," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    18. Nesar Ahmed & Shirley Thompson & Giovanni M. Turchini, 2020. "Organic aquaculture productivity, environmental sustainability, and food security: insights from organic agriculture," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(6), pages 1253-1267, December.
    19. Ivan Portoghese & Raffaella Matarrese & Laura Mirra & Giacomo Giannoccaro, 2025. "Assimilating Farmers’ Behaviour in the Development of an ET-Based Irrigation Water-Accounting Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(14), pages 7749-7774, November.
    20. Zongwei Zhang & Xinyuan Wang & Haonan Liu & Wenjie Li, 2025. "Life Cycle Water Footprint Analysis and Future Prediction Based on LSTM for Arundo donax in Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(7), pages 3109-3128, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.