IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ajaees/389023.html

Problems Faced by the Farmers Using Recommended Farming Technologies in Northern Char Areas of Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Nurani, Nur-E-Shahrin
  • Bagum, Thahamina
  • Akter, Aysha

Abstract

The strategy for using machineries in farm land in different regions will be different depending on the conditions and resources of that region. The study was conducted on northern char farmers under Nilphamary and Kurigram District of Bangladesh. This paper was carried out to study the socio-economic profile of the northern char farmers’ and their problems faced during the use of recommended technology. Random sampling procedure was used to determine the sample size of 150. The data were analyzed by correlation analysis and rank order of PFI technique. Findings illustrated that majority of the respondents (75%) had moderate to low problem facing in that area regarding the use of technology. The findings of this study also indicated that among ten major problems against technology using ‘lack of legal support in case of using technology,’ was considered 1st ranked problem. ‘Lack of special support in any sort of adverse situation, ‘was 2nd ranked problem and ‘Lack of legal soil testing support to identify field problem for using machinery was 3rd ranked problem. Government support with proper monitoring team should be necessary for applying machineries in farmers field properly.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurani, Nur-E-Shahrin & Bagum, Thahamina & Akter, Aysha, 2025. "Problems Faced by the Farmers Using Recommended Farming Technologies in Northern Char Areas of Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, Asian Journal of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology, vol. 43(5).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/389023/files/Nurani4352025AJAEES134879.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md. Nur Alam Siddik, 2017. "The Does Financial Inclusion Promote Women Empowerment? Evidence from Bangladesh," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 169-177, July.
    2. Lybbert, Travis J. & Sumner, Daniel A., 2012. "Agricultural technologies for climate change in developing countries: Policy options for innovation and technology diffusion," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 114-123.
    3. Asfaw, Solomon & Shiferaw, Bekele & Simtowe, Franklin & Lipper, Leslie, 2012. "Impact of modern agricultural technologies on smallholder welfare: Evidence from Tanzania and Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 283-295.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rajeev Sharma & Gurpreet Singh, 2015. "Access to Modern Agricultural Technologies and Farmer Household Welfare: Evidence from India," Millennial Asia, , vol. 6(1), pages 19-43, April.
    2. Tesfaye, Wondimagegn & Tirivayi, Nyasha, 2018. "The impacts of postharvest storage innovations on food security and welfare in Ethiopia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 52-67.
    3. Tambo, Justice A. & Wünscher, Tobias, 2016. "Beyond adoption: welfare effects of farmer innovation behavior in Ghana," Discussion Papers 235297, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    4. Emiliano Magrini & Mauro Vigani, 2016. "Technology adoption and the multiple dimensions of food security: the case of maize in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(4), pages 707-726, August.
    5. Elahi, Ehsan & Weijun, Cui & Zhang, Huiming & Nazeer, Majid, 2019. "Agricultural intensification and damages to human health in relation to agrochemicals: Application of artificial intelligence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 461-474.
    6. Zhongkun Zhu & Wanglin Ma & Chenxin Leng & Peng Nie, 2021. "The Relationship Between Happiness and Consumption Expenditure: Evidence from Rural China," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(4), pages 1587-1611, August.
    7. Nsabimana, Aimable, . "Is change worth it? The effects of adopting modern agricultural inputs on household welfare in Rwanda," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(3).
    8. Ray, Srabashi, 2025. "Joint agricultural input use and food security: evidence from Tanzania," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Ejeta, Tadesse Tolera & Bai, Xiuguang, 2026. "Does the adoption of agricultural green production technologies improve eco-efficiency? Evidence from wheat farmers in Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Tanui, Joseph & Groeneveld, Rolf & Klomp, Jeroen & Mowo, Jeremiahs & Ierland, Ekko C. van, 2013. "Explaining investments in sustainable land management: The role of various income sources in the smallholder farming systems of western Kenya," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 161275, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    11. Seydou Zakari & Germaine Ibro & Bokar Moussa & Tahirou Abdoulaye, 2022. "Adaptation Strategies to Climate Change and Impacts on Household Income and Food Security: Evidence from Sahelian Region of Niger," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Danso-Abbeam, Gideon & Baiyegunhi, Lloyd J.S., 2018. "Welfare impact of pesticides management practices among smallholder cocoa farmers in Ghana," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 10-19.
    13. Folorunsho M. Ajide & James T. Dada & Mosab I. Tabash & Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al‐Faryan, 2025. "Financial Inclusion, Women Empowerment, and Informal Economy in Africa," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(4), December.
    14. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Muhammad Ihtisham & Badar Naseem Siddiqui & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Can Cooperative Supports and Adoption of Improved Technologies Help Increase Agricultural Income? Evidence from a Recent Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    16. Elisabetta Gotor & Muhammed Abdella Usman & Martina Occelli & Basazen Fantahun & Carlo Fadda & Yosef Gebrehawaryat Kidane & Dejene Mengistu & Afewerki Yohannes Kiros & Jemal Nurhisen Mohammed & Mekone, 2021. "Wheat Varietal Diversification Increases Ethiopian Smallholders’ Food Security: Evidence from a Participatory Development Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Faruque-As-Sunny & Zuhui Huang & Taonarufaro Tinaye Pemberai Karimanzira, 2018. "Investigating Key Factors Influencing Farming Decisions Based on Soil Testing and Fertilizer Recommendation Facilities (STFRF)—A Case Study on Rural Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    18. Md. Rabiul Islam & Jakob B. Madsen, 2018. "Knowledge diffusion and agricultural development," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(2), pages 265-276, March.
    19. Tambo, Justice A. & Wünscher, Tobias, 2014. "More than adopters: the welfare impacts of farmer innovation in rural Ghana," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170087, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Brown, Molly E. & Carr, Edward R. & Grace, Kathryn L. & Wiebe, Keith & Funk, Christopher C. & Attavanich, Witsanu & Backlund, Peter & Buja, Lawrence, 2017. "Do markets and trade help or hurt the global food system adapt to climate change?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 154-159.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaees:389023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalajaees.com/index.php/AJAEES/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.