IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Applications Of Game Theory In Agricultural Economics: Review And Requiem

Listed author(s):
  • Dillon, John L.
Registered author(s):

    Game theory - aptly described as the scientific approach to poker, business, women and war - has proved to be no cure-all for the conflict situations studied by agricultural economists. Like Marshall, it has had its day. Still, just as in general economics, game theory has provided an alternative framework for the study of a variety of agricultural problems. This paper aims to review these studies. As background, a brief resume of the more important economic theories of decision making in risky situations will first be given, followed by an outline of the pertinent aspects of game theory. Agricultural applications are then considered. A general appraisal - pro and con, past and future - completes the review.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society in its journal Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics.

    Volume (Year): 06 (1962)
    Issue (Month): 02 (December)

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ags:ajaeau:22459
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    AARES Central Office Manager, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Canberra ACT 0200

    Phone: 0409 032 338
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    in new window

    1. C.D. Throsby, 1961. "Game Theory And A Time‐Of‐Market Decision," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 9-22, 09.
    2. T. W. Schultz & O. H. Brownlee, 1942. "Two Trials to Determine Expectation Models Applicable to Agriculture," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 487-496.
    3. Dillon, John L. & Heady, Earl O., 1958. "Decision Criteria For Innovation," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 2(02), December.
    4. C. Hildreth, 1957. "Problems of Uncertainty in Farm Planning," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1430-1441.
    5. Ward Edwards, 1962. "Utility, subjective probability, their interaction, and variance preferences," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 6(1), pages 42-51, March.
    6. Martin Shubik, 1961. "Some Informal Comments on Models of Decision Processes Under Uncertainty," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 113, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    7. J. Marschak, 1955. "Elements for a Theory of Teams," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 127-137, January.
    8. Otto A. Davis & Andrew Whinston, 1962. "Externalities, Welfare, and the Theory of Games," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70, pages 241-241.
    9. Martin Shubik, 1952. "Information, Theories of Competition, and the Theory of Games," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 60, pages 145-145.
    10. Dillon, John L. & Lloyd, Alan G., 1962. "Inventory Analysis Of Drought Reserves For Queensland Graziers: Some Empirical Analytics," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 6(01), September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ajaeau:22459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.