IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aieabj/393882.html

Bridging the gap: the impact of compensatory measures on mountain farming in Piedmont

Author

Listed:
  • Moino, Francesca
  • Giacardi,Alessandro
  • Califano, Giovanbattista
  • Cagliero, Roberto

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the Rural Development Program (RDP) on reducing income disparities between farms in mountainous and non-mountainous areas in Piedmont, Italy. Using Farm Accounting Data Network data from 2012–2022, the analysis focuses on cattle, sheep and goats, and fruit farms, with 525 farms (3,171 observations; 36% in mountainous areas). A pooled multivariate regression assesses income disparities excluding RDP support, RDP’s effectiveness in mitigating gaps, and the role of compensatory allowance. The findings indicate that significant income disparities are primarily observed in small farms specialized in cattle and sheep and goats, with mountain farms facing a net shortfall of €1,319 and €2,384 per hectare, respectively. While compensatory allowance support helps reduce this gap – by 8.93% for cattle farms and 5.28% for sheep and goat farms – a substantial disparity remains. Bridging the gap entirely would require doubling compensatory payments to €340 per hectare, though alternative strategies are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Moino, Francesca & Giacardi,Alessandro & Califano, Giovanbattista & Cagliero, Roberto, 2025. "Bridging the gap: the impact of compensatory measures on mountain farming in Piedmont," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(3).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/393882/files/W00123_39-49_04-16852-Moino.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Dax & Michael Fischer, 2018. "An alternative policy approach to rural development in regions facing population decline," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 297-315, February.
    2. Sarah H. Whitaker, 2024. "The impact of government policies and regulations on the subjective well-being of farmers in two rural mountain areas of Italy," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1791-1809, December.
    3. Giacomo Staffolani & Deborah Bentivoglio & Adele Finco, 2022. "Consumers’ Purchasing Determinants Towards Mountain Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Alena Andrejovská & Jozef Glova, 2022. "Sustainability of Farms in EU Countries in the Context of Income Indicators: Regression Analysis Based on a New Classification," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Roberto Cagliero & Rita Iacono & Francesco Licciardo & Tiziana Prandi & Novella Rossi, 2018. "La montagna e le zone svantaggiate nei Programmi di Sviluppo Rurale: una valutazione delle indennit? compensative attraverso la rica," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 20(3), pages 479-501.
    6. Namiotko, Virginia & Góral, Justyna & Soliwoda, Michał, . "The economic situation of farms located in less favoured areas on the example of Lithuania and Poland," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 3(4).
    7. Bellon, Mauricio R. & Gotor, Elisabetta & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2015. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Projects Supporting On-Farm Conservation of Native Crops: Evidence From the High Andes of South America," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 162-176.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carbone,Anna & Sardone, Roberta & Zavalloni, Matteo, 2025. "The social sustainability of European agriculture facing old and new challenges. Issues, methods and policies," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 14(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Wieliczko & Agnieszka Kurdyś-Kujawska & Zbigniew Floriańczyk, 2021. "EU Rural Policy’s Capacity to Facilitate a Just Sustainability Transition of the Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Baxter, Jamie Scott & Chatzichristos, Georgios & Christmann, Gabriela & Hennebry, Barraí & Kovanen, Sunna & Novikova, Marina & Olmedo, Lucas & Stoustrup, Sune W. & van Twuijver, Mara & Umantseva, Anna, 2020. "Social Enterprises in Structurally Weak Rural Regions: Innovative Troubleshooters in Action. Handbook for Practitioners," IRS Dialog 6/2020, Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS).
    3. De Toni, Andrea & Vizzarri, Matteo & Di Febbraro, Mirko & Lasserre, Bruno & Noguera, Joan & Di Martino, Paolo, 2021. "Aligning Inner Peripheries with rural development in Italy: Territorial evidence to support policy contextualization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    5. Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, . "The long-term fortunes of territories as a route for agri-food policies: evidence from Geographical Indications," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 10(2).
    6. Innocensia John, 2024. "Indigenous or Exotic Crop Diversity? Which Crops Ensure Household Food Security: Facts from Tanzania Panel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Ioan Prigoreanu & Gabriela Radu & Andreea Grigore-Sava & Carmen Luiza Costuleanu & George Ungureanu & Gabriela Ignat, 2025. "Assessing the Economic Sustainability of the EU and Romanian Farming Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-33, May.
    8. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2022. "Mapping the Optimal Rural Areas to Invest in through the LEADER Approach: Case Study—Extremadura (SW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Laura Onofri, 2024. "Application of Econometrics in Agricultural Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-2, August.
    10. Kusio, Tomasz & Kudełko, Joanna & Borges, Alexandra & Delic, Anamarija & Stroila, Iulia, . "Are there any differences in rural development challenges within European countries? Social and economic contexts from EU rural leaders," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(5).
    11. Rose Nankya & John W. Mulumba & Francesco Caracciolo & Maria Raimondo & Francesca Schiavello & Elisabetta Gotor & Enoch Kikulwe & Devra I. Jarvis, 2017. "Yield Perceptions, Determinants and Adoption Impact of on Farm Varietal Mixtures for Common Bean and Banana in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Lulu Zhou & Li Wang & Kangchuan Su & Guohua Bi & Hongji Chen & Xiaoyu Liu & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Rural Restructuring Evolution and Driving Forces in Mountainous and Hilly Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Zhong, Fanglei & Liu, Yusong & Ma, Yulian & Li, Yaolong & He, Miao, 2025. "The government’s impact on the transformation of rural livelihoods in agropastoral regions: Aquantitative analysis of farmers’ perceptions of public services in Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    14. Alonso Gema Cárdenas & Masot Ana Nieto, 2020. "Rural Space Governance in Extremadura (SW Spain). Analysis of the Leader Approach," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 448-468, December.
    15. Roberto Cagliero & Andrea Arzeni & Federica Cisilino & Alessandro Montelelone & Patrizia Borsotto, 2021. "Ten years after: Diffusion, criticism and potential improvements in the use of FADN for Rural Development assessment in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    16. Yichi Zhang & Zihong Dai & Yirui Chen & Zihan Li & Xinyu Shan & Xinyi Wang & Zhe Feng & Kening Wu, 2025. "The Impact of Rural Population Shrinkage on Rural Functions—A Case Study of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Guido M. Bazzani & Roberta Spadoni, 2021. "Generating cropping schemes from FADN data at the farm and territorial scale," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-32.
    18. Yifan Li & Qiaozhuan Liang, 2024. "A Comparative Study of Two Networked (neoendogenous) Development Approaches: The EU LEADER and China’s Resident Work Team in Poor Villages (RWTIPV)," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 387-411, August.
    19. Mirela Tomaš Simin & Danica Glavaš-Trbić & Aleksandar Miljatović & Jelena Despotović & Tihomir Novaković, 2025. "Farm Sustainability Indicators—Exploring FADN Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Nigel R Curry, 2021. "The rural social economy, community food hubs and the market," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(7-8), pages 569-588, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aieabj:393882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aieaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.