IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v157y2025ics0264837725001760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The government’s impact on the transformation of rural livelihoods in agropastoral regions: Aquantitative analysis of farmers’ perceptions of public services in Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhong, Fanglei
  • Liu, Yusong
  • Ma, Yulian
  • Li, Yaolong
  • He, Miao

Abstract

The transition to sustainable livelihoods is essential to enhancing rural households’ incomes and ecological conservation and to promote rural development. Previous studies have primarily focused on internal determinants of livelihood transformation, such as household livelihood capital. However, few studies have quantitatively analyzed the role of governmental interventions in livelihood transformation. Using an improved Sustainable Livelihoods Approach, we examined farmers’ perceptions of public services as an indicator of governmental influence in Horqin Left Wing Rear Banner in Inner Mongolia, a typical agropastoral transition zone. We examined the role of governmental interventions on farmers’ livelihood transformation decisions, applying entropy weighting and regression analysis to survey data gathered from 491 agropastoral households. We found that farmers’ positive perceptions of public services significantly influenced their willingness to transform their livelihoods, with every unit increase in positive perceptions associated with a 2.26-unit increase in transformation willingness. Perceptions of public services differed significantly among different types of farming households, with farming-only and mixed-farming households reporting more positive perceptions than herding-only and non-farming households. Furthermore, willingness to transform livelihoods varied significantly by household type, with mixed-farming households and herding-only households exhibiting greater willingness (average scores of 3.94 and 3.75, respectively) than farming-only and non-farming households (2.41 and 2.61, respectively). Lastly, interactions among public services and livelihood capitals significantly enhanced farmers’ willingness to transform their livelihoods. We recommend differentiated public service policies tailored to household characteristics and wide dissemination of improved agropastoral technologies and animal disease control services to promote a shift to sustainable livelihoods among rural households.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhong, Fanglei & Liu, Yusong & Ma, Yulian & Li, Yaolong & He, Miao, 2025. "The government’s impact on the transformation of rural livelihoods in agropastoral regions: Aquantitative analysis of farmers’ perceptions of public services in Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001760
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837725001760
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:157:y:2025:i:c:s0264837725001760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.