IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/afjecr/330383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implications of Self-selection Effects and Transaction Costs on Implementation of Collective Action Management for the Common: Evidence from Smallholder Irrigated Rice Farms int he Lake Victoria Basin, Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Sonda, George
  • Ngaruko, Deus D.

Abstract

This paper explores how farmers self-select into irrigation farming ecosystem, and describe their characteristics and effects on Collective Actions (CA) management in irrigation systems. The study sampled seven irrigation schemes; both traditional improved and modern ones located in the Lake Victoria basin, namely Mahiga irrigation scheme (Ngudu), Igongwa (Misungwi), Nyida (Shinyanga rural), Maliwanda and Nyatwali (Bunda), Cheleche and Irienyi (Rorya). Cross sectional research design is employed to collect data from a total of 184 randomly sampled farm households involved in rice irrigation farming. Collected data are analyzed using Heckman two step procedures to identify self-selection factors. The inverse mills ratio result from the Heckman model is positive and significant at less than 5 % level, confirming the evidence for the presence of self-selection for the sampled farmers. Factors like large number of household labour force; non tangible benefits like reciprocated information sharing and use of CA association as a bridge to access support; good working rules in the group; net area sown; trust in group members and leaders; irrigation position; respect of public services provision /contributions; dodging contributions; violation of rules are important determinants of self-selection, each with specific implication that impact positively or negatively on CA survival. The study concludes that irrigation farming ecosystem choice is a non-random choice, and hence selection of members for organized CA establishment should base on factors described above, which significantly impacted positively self-selection into treatment (irrigation ecosystem type).

Suggested Citation

  • Sonda, George & Ngaruko, Deus D., 2022. "Implications of Self-selection Effects and Transaction Costs on Implementation of Collective Action Management for the Common: Evidence from Smallholder Irrigated Rice Farms int he Lake Victoria Basin," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(5), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:330383
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.330383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330383/files/238513-Article%20Text-575358-1-10-20221215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.330383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth & DiGregorio, Monica & McCarthy, Nancy, 2004. "Methods for studying collective action in rural development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 197-214, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crespo, Joan & Réquier-Desjardins, Denis & Vicente, Jérôme, 2014. "Why can collective action fail in Local Agri-food Systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 165-177.
    2. Stefani, Gianluca & Lombardi, Ginevra Virginia & Romano, Donato & Cei, Leonardo, 2017. "Grass Root Collective Action for Territorially Integrated Food Supply Chains: A Case Study from Tuscany," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(4), October.
    3. Hanatani, Atsushi & Fuse, Kana, 2010. "Linking Resource Users’ Perceptions and Collective Action in Commons Management," Working Papers 24, JICA Research Institute.
    4. Daniel Kangogo & Domenico Dentoni & Jos Bijman, 2020. "Determinants of Farm Resilience to Climate Change: The Role of Farmer Entrepreneurship and Value Chain Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Beatriz Carmona-Moya & Antonia Calvo-Salguero & María-del-Carmen Aguilar-Luzón, 2021. "EIMECA: A Proposal for a Model of Environmental Collective Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Catacutan, Delia & Bertomeu, Manuel & Arbes, Lyndon & Duque, Caroline & Butra, Novie, 2008. "Fluctuating fortunes of a collective entreprise: The case of the Agroforestry Tree Seeds Association of Lantapan (ATSAL) in the Philippines," CAPRi working papers 76, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Biggeri, Mario & Carraro, Alessandro & Ciani, Federico & Romano, Donato, 2022. "Disentangling the impact of a multiple-component project on SDG dimensions: The case of durum wheat value chain development in Oromia (Ethiopia)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    8. Barham, James & Chitemi, Clarence, 2008. "Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania," CAPRi working papers 74, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Julissa Alexandra Galarza-Villamar & Mariette McCampbell & Cees Leeuwis & Francesco Cecchi, 2021. "Adding Emergence and Spatiality to a Public Bad Game for Studying Dynamics in Socio-Ecological Systems (Part I): The Design of Musa-Game for Integrative Analysis of Collective Action in Banana Disease," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    10. Corsi, Stefano & Marchisio, Laura Viviana & Orsi, Luigi, 2017. "Connecting smallholder farmers to local markets: Drivers of collective action, land tenure and food security in East Chad," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-47.
    11. Kenji Kitamura & Chigusa Nakagawa & Tetsu Sato, 2018. "Formation of a Community of Practice in the Watershed Scale, with Integrated Local Environmental Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Cembalo, Luigi & Pascucci, Stefano & Tagliafierro, Carolina & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2014. "Promoting Agro-Energy Supply Chain As A Collective Action," 88th Annual Conference, April 9-11, 2014, AgroParisTech, Paris, France 170481, Agricultural Economics Society.
    13. Timsina, Jagadish & Weerahewa, Jeevika, 2023. "Restoring ancient irrigation systems for sustainable agro-ecosystems development: Reflections on the special issue," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    14. Sukumar Sarkar & Biswajit Ray, 2020. "Collective Action and Tragedy of Tank Water," Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, , vol. 19(2), pages 224-249, December.
    15. Mukundi, Eric & Mathenge, Mary K. & Ngigi, Margaret, 2013. "Sweet Potato Marketing Among Smallholder Farmers: The Role of Collective Action," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 160679, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    16. Ratner, B. D., 2013. "Addressing conflict through collective action in natural resource management: a synthesis of experience," IWMI Working Papers H046235, International Water Management Institute.
    17. Tittonell, P. & van Wijk, M.T. & Herrero, M. & Rufino, M.C. & de Ridder, N. & Giller, K.E., 2009. "Beyond resource constraints - Exploring the biophysical feasibility of options for the intensification of smallholder crop-livestock systems in Vihiga district, Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 1-19, June.
    18. Novo, Paula & Garrido, Alberto, 2011. "Informing irrigation districts developing in Nicaragua: challenges from a social capital and collective action perspective," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114603, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Hanatani, Atsushi, 2010. "Exploring the Causal Mechanism of Collective Action for Susttainable Resource Management," Working Papers 23, JICA Research Institute.
    20. Schroeder, Claudia & Zeller, Manfred & Agboh-Noameshie, Afiavi R., 2013. "Women, Social Capital and Collective Action – The Case of NERICA Rice Technology in Benin," Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, Humboldt-Universitaat zu Berlin, vol. 52(4), pages 1-28, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:afjecr:330383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajer/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.