IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesars/410166.html

Investigating Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Renewable Energy Technology for Farming: Determinants of Decision Making in Northern Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Karbo, Ransford Teng-viel
  • Frewer, Lynn J.
  • Areal, Francisco J.
  • Boaitey, Albert
  • Jones, Glyn
  • Garrod, Guy

Abstract

ntegrating renewable energy into agricultural practices can result in environmental and economic benefits. In Ghana, renewable energy resources that can support agronomic activities include solar energy and biomass. Although policies and interventions that promote Ghanaian renewable energy development and implementation currently exist, it is not yet understood which factors motivate farmers to adopt renewable energy technologies within the country’s agricultural sector. This research aimed to identify which psychological and economic factors influence Northern Ghanaian farmers’ intention to adopt renewable energy technology within agriculture. A survey was administered to farmers (n = 418) in Lawra Municipality in Northern Ghana, where farming represents the main source of income. Structural Equation Modelling was applied to test and validate an adapted theoretical model (the Decomposed Theory of Planned Behaviour) to identify which factors are associated with farmers’ likelihood to adopt renewable energy technology. Attitude, Perceived Behavioural Control, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Compatibility, Risk, Peer and External Influences, Self-efficacy, Resource-Facilitating Conditions, and Technology-Facilitating Conditions were positive and significant factors influencing farmers’ intention to adopt renewable energy technology. However, subjective norms did not positively predict farmers’ intentions. The results suggest that to ensure the widespread adoption of renewable energy in Ghanaian agriculture, policies and interventions could usefully align with the psychological attributes of farmers. Policymakers should develop and implement appropriate policies to encourage sustainable technology adoption in agriculture, including tax and credit subsidies and green financing frameworks to increase support for farmers to adopt renewable energy technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Karbo, Ransford Teng-viel & Frewer, Lynn J. & Areal, Francisco J. & Boaitey, Albert & Jones, Glyn & Garrod, Guy, 2025. "Investigating Farmers’ Intention to Adopt Renewable Energy Technology for Farming: Determinants of Decision Making in Northern Ghana," Agricultural & Rural Studies (A&R), Zhejiang A&F University, vol. 3(1), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesars:410166
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.410166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/410166/files/A%26R-3-1-0003.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.410166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Xuyi & Zhang, Shun & Bae, Junghan, 2017. "The nexus of renewable energy-agriculture-environment in BRICS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 489-496.
    2. Cheteni, Priviledge & Mushunje, Abbyssinia & Taruvinga, Amon, 2014. "Barriers and Incentives to Potential Adoption of Biofuels Crops by Smallholder Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa," MPRA Paper 59029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Ayamga, Ezekiel Anabire & Kemausuor, Francis & Addo, Ahmad, 2015. "Technical analysis of crop residue biomass energy in an agricultural region of Ghana," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 51-60.
    4. Harvey, Mark & Pilgrim, Sarah, 2011. "The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 40-51, January.
    5. Harvey, Mark & Pilgrim, Sarah, 2011. "The new competition for land: Food, energy, and climate change," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 40-51.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sika Gadzanku & Heather Mirletz & Nathan Lee & Jennifer Daw & Adam Warren, 2021. "Benefits and Critical Knowledge Gaps in Determining the Role of Floating Photovoltaics in the Energy-Water-Food Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Defante, Lilliane Renata & Vilpoux, Olivier François & Sauer, Leandro, 2018. "Rapid expansion of sugarcane crop for biofuels and influence on food production in the first producing region of Brazil," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 121-131.
    3. Tiffany L. Fess & James B. Kotcon & Vagner A. Benedito, 2011. "Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(10), pages 1-31, October.
    4. Kaige Wang & Xiangyu Zhao & Huihui Zheng & Bangyou Zheng & Yan Xu & Fengrong Zhang & Zengqiang Duan, 2024. "The Agro-Pastoral Transitional Zone in Northern China: Continuously Intensifying Land Use Competition Leading to Imbalanced Spatial Matching of Ecological Elements," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Elliot Boateng & Janet Dzator & Mary Amponsah & Michael Dzator, 2025. "Addressing Food Security in Sub‐Saharan African Region: The Role of Financial Sector Development and Informality," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), December.
    6. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    7. Cao, Yan & Doustgani, Amir & Salehi, Abozar & Nemati, Mohammad & Ghasemi, Amir & Koohshekan, Omid, 2020. "The economic evaluation of establishing a plant for producing biodiesel from edible oil wastes in oil-rich countries: Case study Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    8. Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva & Mateus Batistella & Yue Dou & Emilio Moran & Sara McMillan Torres & Jianguo Liu, 2017. "The Sino-Brazilian Telecoupled Soybean System and Cascading Effects for the Exporting Country," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Budzyński, Wojciech Stefan & Jankowski, Krzysztof Józef & Jarocki, Marcin, 2015. "An analysis of the energy efficiency of winter rapeseed biomass under different farming technologies. A case study of a large-scale farm in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1272-1279.
    10. Lazaro, Lira Luz Benites & Giatti, Leandro Luiz & Bermann, Celio & Giarolla, Angelica & Ometto, Jean, 2021. "Policy and governance dynamics in the water-energy-food-land nexus of biofuels: Proposing a qualitative analysis model," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Tomas Linder, 2019. "Making the case for edible microorganisms as an integral part of a more sustainable and resilient food production system," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(2), pages 265-278, April.
    12. Gerssen-Gondelach, S.J. & Saygin, D. & Wicke, B. & Patel, M.K. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2014. "Competing uses of biomass: Assessment and comparison of the performance of bio-based heat, power, fuels and materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 964-998.
    13. Robert Fish & Michael Winter & Matt Lobley, 2014. "Sustainable intensification and ecosystem services: new directions in agricultural governance," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(1), pages 51-67, March.
    14. Emmann, Carsten H. & Schaper, Christian & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Der Markt für Bioenergie 2012," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(Supplemen), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Antonina Ivanova & Asim Zia & Paiman Ahmad & Mairon Bastos-Lima, 0. "Climate mitigation policies and actions: access and allocation issues," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    16. Barco, A. & Maucieri, C. & Borin, M., 2018. "Root system characterization and water requirements of ten perennial herbaceous species for biomass production managed with high nitrogen and water inputs," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 37-47.
    17. Luís Carmo-Calado & Manuel Jesús Hermoso-Orzáez & Roberta Mota-Panizio & Bruno Guilherme-Garcia & Paulo Brito, 2020. "Co-Combustion of Waste Tires and Plastic-Rubber Wastes with Biomass Technical and Environmental Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, February.
    18. Chao-Chen Chung & Siang-Cing Yang, 2016. "The Emergence and Challenging Growth of the Bio-Ethanol Innovation System in Taiwan (1949–2015)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Sean Low & Livia Fritz & Chad M. Baum & Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2024. "Public perceptions on carbon removal from focus groups in 22 countries," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    20. de Jong, Sierk & Hoefnagels, Ric & Wetterlund, Elisabeth & Pettersson, Karin & Faaij, André & Junginger, Martin, 2017. "Cost optimization of biofuel production – The impact of scale, integration, transport and supply chain configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 1055-1070.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesars:410166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ccfd.zafu.edu.cn .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.