IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aesars/409032.html

Sustainable and Traditional Agricultural Practices to Reinforce Income Dynamics Among Tribal Communities in Rural Wayanad, Kerala, India

Author

Listed:
  • Prathapachandran, Nikhil
  • Devadas, Varuvel

Abstract

This comprehensive study conducted in Wayanad, Kerala, India, explores sustainable traditional farming practices in rural tribal households, with a primary goal of boosting income growth and agricultural productivity. The research delves into the intricate relationship between agricultural methods, income distribution, and ecological factors across household income brackets. Descriptive statistics provide a contextual understanding, while regression analysis offers insights into the relationships between Income and Agricultural Practices. The study assesses the impact of various traditional methods on agriculture, investigates the profitability and practices associated with organic, artificial, and mixed farming, and observes that mixed farming methods are more profitable than relying solely on natural practices, with income levels influencing the adoption of advanced farming technologies. The research explores the correlation between combining animal husbandry and agriculture in households, revealing an association with increased profit margins. Emphasizing the importance of sustainable agricultural practices, the study shows a preference for traditional farming techniques in the low-income bracket and a shift towards artificial methods as income rises. The research offers valuable insights into income, farming practices, and sustainability in this context.

Suggested Citation

  • Prathapachandran, Nikhil & Devadas, Varuvel, 2023. "Sustainable and Traditional Agricultural Practices to Reinforce Income Dynamics Among Tribal Communities in Rural Wayanad, Kerala, India," Agricultural & Rural Studies (A&R), Zhejiang A&F University, vol. 1(3), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesars:409032
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.409032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/409032/files/A%26R-1-3-0017.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.409032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Douwe Van der Ploeg & Marjolein Visser, 2019. "The economic potential of agroecology: Empirical evidence from Europe," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/289295, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De La Cruz S., Marco & Dessein, Joost, 2021. "Beyond institutional bricolage: An ‘intertwining approach’ to understanding the transition towards agroecology in Peru," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    2. Daniel López-García & Manuel González de Molina, 2021. "An Operational Approach to Agroecology-Based Local Agri-Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Huanyu Chang & Yong Zhao & Yongqiang Cao & He Ren & Jiaqi Yao & Rong Liu & Wei Li, 2025. "Evaluating Coupling Security and Joint Risks in Northeast China Agricultural Systems Based on Copula Functions and the Rel–Cor–Res Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-30, June.
    4. Swagemakers, Paul & Schermer, Markus & Domínguez García, María Dolores & Milone, Pierluigi & Ventura, Flaminia, 2021. "To what extent do brands contribute to sustainability transition in agricultural production practices? Lessons from three European case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Vincenzo Fiore & Massimiliano Borrello & Domenico Carlucci & Giacomo Giannoccaro & Simone Russo & Sarah Stempfle & Luigi Roselli, 2024. "The socio-economic issues of agroecology: a scoping review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-38, December.
    6. Maurice Cossi Ahozonlin & Luc Hippolyte Dossa, 2020. "Diversity and Resilience to Socio-Ecological Changes of Smallholder Lagune Cattle Farming Systems of Benin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Marull, Joan & Torabi, Parisa & Padró, Roc & Alabert, Aureli & La Rota, Maria José & Serrano, Tarik, 2020. "Energy-Landscape Optimization for Land Use Planning. Application in the Barcelona Metropolitan Area," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    8. Milford, Anna & Lien, Gudbrand & Reed, Matthew, 2021. "Different Sales Channels for Different Farmers: Local and Mainstream Marketing of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in Norway," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315058, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Phoebe Koundouri & Konstantinos Dellis & Christopher Deranian & Theofanis Zacharatos, 2025. "Towards a sustainable Agri-food System for Greece: Insights from the FABLE Calculator," DEOS Working Papers 2556, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    10. Federico Antonioli & Simone Severini & Mauro Vigani, 2026. "Foreign labor, peer‐networking and agricultural efficiency in the Italian dairy sector," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(3), pages 1080-1102, July.
    11. Robert Skrzypczyński & Sylwia Dołzbłasz & Krzysztof Janc & Andrzej Raczyk, 2021. "Beyond Supporting Access to Land in Socio-Technical Transitions. How Polish Grassroots Initiatives Help Farmers and New Entrants in Transitioning to Sustainable Models of Agriculture," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Christian Grovermann & Sylvain Quiédeville & Adrian Muller & Florian Leiber & Matthias Stolze & Simon Moakes, 2021. "Does organic certification make economic sense for dairy farmers in Europe?–A latent class counterfactual analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 1001-1012, November.
    13. Giuseppe Gargano & Francesco Licciardo & Milena Verrascina & Barbara Zanetti, 2021. "The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030—Some Evidence from the Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    14. Nilsson, Pia & Bommarco, Riccardo & Hansson, Helena & Kuns, Brian & Schaak, Henning, 2022. "Farm performance and input self-sufficiency increases with functional crop diversity on Swedish farms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Laure Latruffe & Gerald Schwarz, 2022. "Insights on Transitions to Agroecological Farming from across Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 3-4, December.
    16. Alan Matthews, 2022. "Prospects for Agroecology in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 80-83, December.
    17. Maria Markiewicz-Keszycka & Áine Macken-Walsh & Aileen Carter & Simon Mooney & Emma J. Devereux & Maeve Henchion & Paul Hynds, 2025. "Farmers’ Experiences of Transitioning Towards Agroecology: Narratives of Change in Western Europe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, March.
    18. Xabier Díaz de Otálora & Agustín del Prado & Federico Dragoni & Fernando Estellés & Barbara Amon, 2021. "Evaluating Three-Pillar Sustainability Modelling Approaches for Dairy Cattle Production Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, June.
    19. Michael Carolan, 2024. "Who and what gets recognized in digital agriculture: agriculture 4.0 at the intersectionality of (Dis)Ableism, labor, and recognition justice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(4), pages 1465-1480, December.
    20. Shaibu Mellon Bedi & Pia Nilsson & Helena Hansson, 2025. "The impact of drought on farm economic performance: evidence from Sweden," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 2311-2337, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesars:409032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ccfd.zafu.edu.cn .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.