IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2024i1p9-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What do Female Consumers Think about Sustainable Packaging?

Author

Listed:
  • María Aránzazu SULÉ-ALONSO

    (Department of Business Management and Economics. University of León)

  • Inés BARBETA-MARTà NEZ

    (CIHEAM Zaragoza, Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Zaragoza)

  • Rosana FUENTES-FERNÃ NDEZ

    (Department of Business Management and Economics. University of León)

Abstract

This study explores the level of knowledge among Spanish consumers regarding sustainability and their opinions on new sustainable packaging options, such as bio-based materials or bagasse. We conducted an online questionnaire at a national level, followed by multivariate analysis to derive conclusive results. Our findings, based on 254 participants, indicate that only 44% of consumers integrate sustainability into their daily lives. Key characteristics deemed important for sustainable packaging include environmental friendliness (85%), use of clean energy (72.5%), ease of reuse (85.8%), and recyclable materials (80.8%). Factor analysis reveals three categories: manufacturing characteristics, security, and price. Cluster analysis identifies two groups: one concerned with container safety and another seeking achievable sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • María Aránzazu SULÉ-ALONSO & Inés BARBETA-MARTà NEZ & Rosana FUENTES-FERNà NDEZ, 2024. "What do Female Consumers Think about Sustainable Packaging?," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 9-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2024:i:1:p:9-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2024/JETIMM_V01_2024_92.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sungchul Choi & Alex Ng, 2011. "Environmental and Economic Dimensions of Sustainability and Price Effects on Consumer Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(2), pages 269-282, December.
    2. Juran Kim, 2018. "Social dimension of sustainability: From community to social capital," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 175-181, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick, 2017. "The effects of environmental sustainability and R&D on corporate risk-taking: International evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Stefan Schaltegger & Roger Burritt & Dimitar Zvezdov & Jacob Hörisch & Joanne Tingey-Holyoak, 2015. "Management Roles and Sustainability Information. Exploring Corporate Practice," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(4), pages 328-345, December.
    3. Gálvez-Sánchez, Francisco Jesús & Molina-Prados, Aida & Molina-Moreno, Valentín & Moral-Cuadra, Salvador, 2024. "Exploring the three-dimensional effect of corporate social responsibility on brand equity, corporate reputation, and willingness to pay. A study of the fashion industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Hongxia Zhao & Hongyang Chen & Huijuan Zhao & Ying Lu & Jianhua Zhu, 2024. "What business environment element configuration can promote urban digitization development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27923-27944, November.
    5. Imran Khan & Faheem Ur Rehman & Paula Pypłacz & Muhammad Asif Khan & Agnieszka Wiśniewska & Katarzyna Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, 2021. "A Dynamic Linkage between Financial Development, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from an Asymmetric and Nonlinear ARDL Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Lee, Eun-Ju & Choi, Hanah & Han, Jinghe & Kim, Dong Hyun & Ko, Eunju & Kim, Kyung Hoon, 2020. "How to “Nudge” your consumers toward sustainable fashion consumption: An fMRI investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 642-651.
    7. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Fifita, 'Ilaisaane M.E. & Seo, Yuri & Ko, Eunju & Conroy, Denise & Hong, Dayun, 2020. "Fashioning organics: Wellbeing, sustainability, and status consumption practices," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 664-671.
    9. Shima Mirzaei & Sajjad Shokouhyar, 2023. "Applying a thematic analysis in identifying the role of circular economy in sustainable supply chain practices," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4691-4722, May.
    10. Chih-Chien Wang & Shu-Chen Chang & Pei-Ying Chen, 2021. "The Brand Sustainability Obstacle: Viewpoint Incompatibility and Consumer Boycott," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Sánchez Fernández, Raquel & Iniesta-Bonillo, M. Ángeles & Cervera-Taulet, Amparo, 2019. "Exploring the concept of perceived sustainability at tourist destinations: a market segmentation approach," MPRA Paper 123151, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Gema García‐Piqueres & Rebeca García‐Ramos, 2020. "Is the corporate social responsibility–innovation link homogeneous?: Looking for sustainable innovation in the Spanish context," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 803-814, March.
    13. Patrick Klein & Bastian Popp, 2022. "Last-Mile Delivery Methods in E-Commerce: Does Perceived Sustainability Matter for Consumer Acceptance and Usage?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    14. Sung Hee Lee & Kun Soo Park & Yong Won Seo, 2016. "Multinational Firm’s Production Decisions under Overlapping Free Trade Agreements: Rule of Origin Requirements and Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Montserrat Boronat-Navarro & José Antonio Pérez-Aranda, 2019. "Consumers’ perceived corporate social responsibility evaluation and support: The moderating role of consumer information," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(4), pages 613-638, June.
    16. Katarzyna Liczmańska-Kopcewicz & Paula Pypłacz & Agnieszka Wiśniewska, 2020. "Resonance of Investments in Renewable Energy Sources in Industrial Enterprises in the Food Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, August.
    17. Harrison, Spencer Huber & Nurmohamed, Samir, 2023. "Dirty creativity: An inductive study of how creative workers champion new designs that are stigmatized," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    18. Wiśniewska, Agnieszka & Liczmańska-Kopcewicz, Katarzyna & Pypłacz, Paula, 2022. "Antecedents of young adults’ willingness to support brands investing in renewable energy sources," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 177-187.
    19. Sini Laari & Tomi Solakivi & Anu Bask & Juuso Töyli & Lauri Ojala, 2021. "Unravelling Mickey Mouse: The Effect of Supply Chain Position and Organisational Slack on the Uneven Balance of Sustainability Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Yeonsoo Kim, 2017. "Consumer Responses to the Food Industry’s Proactive and Passive Environmental CSR, Factoring in Price as CSR Tradeoff," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 307-321, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sustainability; food consumption trends; packaging; bio-based; bio-plastic.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M30 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2024:i:1:p:9-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.