IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jetimm/v1y2016i1p292-301.html

Business Process Management as a Strategy to Make Organizational Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Fabrizio Baldassarre

    (University of Bari Aldo Moro)

  • Francesca Ricciardi

    (University of Bari Aldo Moro)

  • Raffaele Campo

    (University of Bari Aldo Moro)

Abstract

Currently it is necessary for companies to innovate products and services in order to create value for customers, reducing costs and improving business performance. It is essential to start from the analysis of the organizational structure, ensuring the adjustment to market needs, through the redefinition and monitor of business processes. With reference to innovation, it is not only a technological or digital, but also organizational. In fact the concept of technology can be interpreted more broadly, recognizing that “technology” is incorporated in all activities of the business system. To realize an organizational innovation, it can be possible to adopt a winner strategy to grant the survival of companies, in term of grew of productivity and cut of costs: Business Process Management is a methodology of approach to the process improvement, that make it possible to pass from uncooperative to a synergy strategy. Thanks to the adoption of Business Process Management methods, supported by specific software tools and the use of new ICT technologies, it is possible to streamline the operations management, the identification of risk indicators and performance, ensuring the rapid adoption of corrective policies and improvements. The present work provides an academic support, through a focus on the approach of improvement, in an integrated and comparative perspective with the methodology of Reengineering; it has emerged from the literature, as a most significant part of the studies put more attention to Reengineering approach. From a practical point of view, this work aims to provide a concrete contribution by proposing an example of business process management analysis, according to a perspective of improvement, demonstrating the usefulness and potential of this method.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabrizio Baldassarre & Francesca Ricciardi & Raffaele Campo, 2016. "Business Process Management as a Strategy to Make Organizational Innovation," Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 292-301, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:292-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.etimm.ase.ro/RePEc/aes/jetimm/2016/ETIMM_V01_2016_98.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hammer, Michael & Champy, James, 1993. "Reengineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 90-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Bruyn, Barbara & Gelders, Ludo, 1997. "From TQM to BPR: Two case studies in personnel administration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 169-181, June.
    2. Youseef Alotaibi, 2016. "Business process modelling challenges and solutions: a literature review," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 701-723, August.
    3. Gerrit Versteeg & Harry Bouwman, 2006. "Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 91-102, February.
    4. Dossani, Rafiq & Kenney, Martin, 2007. "The Next Wave of Globalization: Relocating Service Provision to India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 772-791, May.
    5. J S Edwards & B Ababneh & M Hall & D Shaw, 2009. "Knowledge management: a review of the field and of OR's contribution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 114-125, May.
    6. Jose Ángel Gumiel & Jon Mabe & Jaime Jiménez & Jon Barruetabeña, 2022. "Introducing the Electronic Knowledge Framework into the Traditional Automotive Suppliers’ Industry: From Mechanical Engineering to Mechatronics," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-17, June.
    7. Ahmed Musa & Al-Amin Abba Dabo, 2016. "A Review of RFID in Supply Chain Management: 2000–2015," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(2), pages 189-228, June.
    8. Laura Stefanescu & Madalina Constantinescu & Andy Stefanescu & Pompiliu Constantinescu, 2007. "Rethinking The Business Process Through Reengineering," Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Financial Management and Accounting Craiova, vol. 2(1(2)_Fall).
    9. Krieger, Bernhard & Müller, Philipp, 2001. "Mind the Gap - Building Profitable Community Based Businesses on the Internet," Research Memorandum 012, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    10. Darko SHULESKI & Crina Veronica CRISTEA, 2014. "Smart Practices Of Business Process Re-Engineering In The Public And Private Sector Using Cloud Computing Technologies," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 497-508, November.
    11. Patrick Afflerbach & Martin Hohendorf & Jonas Manderscheid, 2017. "Design it like Darwin - A value-based application of evolutionary algorithms for proper and unambiguous business process redesign," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1101-1121, October.
    12. David Córcoles & Ángela Triguero & María C. Cuerva, 2025. "Technological Collaboration and the Industry 4.0 Transformation: Evidence for Spanish Manufacturing Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(6), pages 17664-17698, December.
    13. Panayiotou, Nikolaos A. & Gayialis, Sotiris P. & Tatsiopoulos, I.P.Ilias P., 2004. "An e-procurement system for governmental purchasing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 79-102, July.
    14. Veronika Vašíčková, 2019. "Crisis Management Process - A Literature Review and a Conceptual Integration," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3-4), pages 61-77.
    15. Vergidis, K. & Turner, C.J. & Tiwari, A., 2008. "Business process perspectives: Theoretical developments vs. real-world practice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 91-104, July.
    16. Seidmann, Abraham & Sundararajan, Arun, 1997. "The effects of task and information asymmetry on business process redesign," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 117-128, June.
    17. Martin Lehnert & Maximilian Röglinger & Johannes Seyfried, 2018. "Prioritization of Interconnected Processes," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(2), pages 95-114, April.
    18. Jonathan Linton, 2018. "Quiet Contributors: The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in Innovation," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 6-12.
    19. Xue Bai & Ramayya Krishnan & Rema Padman & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2013. "On Risk Management with Information Flows in Business Processes," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 731-749, September.
    20. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:241-255 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Robert Van Der Meer, 1997. "Book Reviews," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 182-183, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jetimm:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:292-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lucian Onisor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.