IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v27y2025i69p414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Young Consumers’ Perception of Vegan Food: A New Ethic, a Trend or a Risk?

Author

Listed:
  • Magdalena Bobe

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Roxana Procopie

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mihaela Bucur

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Given the increasing popularity of veganism in recent years, this article highlights the health, ethical and environmental considerations in changing dietary style and promoting sustainable food consumption, answering questions about the related motivations for vegan dietary adoption. The article is based on qualitative research among young consumers, and the data collection was conducted in a focus group, with the aim of identifying their perceptions of vegan food. The data analysis followed a thematic coding methodology, identifying the main typologies of perceptions and behaviors that determine the adoption or rejection of this eating style, taking into account the existing social and economic barriers. The food system needs to adjust its production, marketing and promotion strategies to adapt to the growing trend of vegan food, and the study brings a new perspective on the decision to adopt vegan food, by linking economic factors with the ethical, cultural and sustainable dimension of this food style in Romania. The study contributes to the literature by highlighting the determinants of the transition to a vegan diet among young people, as well as by identifying the information gaps that influence food choices. The results emphasize the need to improve nutrition education and informed access to plant-based foods, as there are practical as well as psychological difficulties in the adoption of vegan diets by young people. This research differs from previous studies by analyzing the perception of vegan food in Romanian universities and by integrating economic factors with the ethical, cultural and sustainable dimension.

Suggested Citation

  • Magdalena Bobe & Roxana Procopie & Mihaela Bucur, 2025. "Young Consumers’ Perception of Vegan Food: A New Ethic, a Trend or a Risk?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(69), pages 414-414, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3412.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Alghamdi, Aseel & Sharma, Veenu & Mehrotra, Ankit & Badghish, Saeed, 2024. "Diet or lifestyle: Consumer purchase behavior of vegan retailing. A qualitative assessment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Richard Twine, 2014. "Vegan Killjoys at the Table—Contesting Happiness and Negotiating Relationships with Food Practices," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2018. "Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(1), pages 23-48, March.
    5. Magdalena Weber & Marlene Kollmayer, 2022. "Psychological Processes Underlying an Omnivorous, Vegetarian, or Vegan Diet: Gender Role Self-Concept, Human Supremacy Beliefs, and Moral Disengagement from Meat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    6. András Fehér & Michał Gazdecki & Miklós Véha & Márk Szakály & Zoltán Szakály, 2020. "A Comprehensive Review of the Benefits of and the Barriers to the Switch to a Plant-Based Diet," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    7. Alexander, Bethan & Varley, Rosemary, 2025. "Retail futures: Customer experience, phygital retailing, and the Experiential Retail Territories perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelvin Mwita, 2022. "Factors influencing data saturation in qualitative studies," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 414-420, June.
    2. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2021. "Cradle to Cradle is a Sustainable Economic Policy for the Better Future," MPRA Paper 111334, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Oct 2021.
    4. Gülüm Özer & İdil Işık & Jordi Escartín, 2024. "Is There Somebody Looking out for Me? A Qualitative Analysis of Bullying Experiences of Individuals Diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-22, January.
    5. Saini, Munish & Prakash, Gyan & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar & Agarwal, Reeti, 2024. "Why do people purchase plant-based meat products from retail stores? Examining consumer preferences, motivations and drivers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Beáta Andrea Dan & Karolina Eszter Kovács & Katinka Bacskai & Tímea Ceglédi & Gabriella Pusztai, 2023. "Family–SEN School Collaboration and Its Importance in Guiding Educational and Health-Related Policies and Practices in the Hungarian Minority Community in Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Rosen, Joseph G. & Nakyanjo, Neema & Ddaaki, William G. & Zhao, Tongying & Van Vo, Anh & Nakubulwa, Rosette & Ssekyewa, Charles & Isabirye, Dauda & Katono, Ruth L. & Nabakka, Proscovia & Ssemwanga, Ri, 2023. "Identifying longitudinal patterns of HIV treatment (dis)engagement and re-engagement from oral histories of virologically unsuppressed persons in Uganda: A thematic trajectory analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    8. Mahbubur RAHMAN & Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Rohingya-The Stateless Community Becoming the Lost Generation," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(2), pages 24-36, June.
    9. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2021. "Estimation Of Cost Minimization Of Garments Sector By Cobb-Douglas Production Function: Bangladesh Perspective," Annals of Spiru Haret University, Economic Series, Universitatea Spiru Haret, vol. 21(2), pages 247-267.
    10. Whitesell, Callie & Blount, Thomas H. & Alton Dailey, Susan & Hall, Marissa G. & Ribisl, Kurt M. & Sheeran, Paschal & Kalan, Mohammad Ebrahimi & Brewer, Noel T., 2024. "Uncontrolled vaping and restraint strategies: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    11. Júlio Belo Fernandes & Diana Vareta & Sónia Fernandes & Ana Silva Almeida & Dina Peças & Noélia Ferreira & Liliana Roldão, 2022. "Rehabilitation Workforce Challenges to Implement Person-Centered Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-9, March.
    12. Chikako Ishizuka & Kei Aoki, 2024. "Drivers of sustained brand engagement: cases of long-term customers of hedonic and utilitarian brands in Japan," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(4), pages 979-989, December.
    13. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2023. "Glaserian Grounded Theory and Straussian Grounded Theory: Two Standard Qualitative Research Approaches in Social Science," MPRA Paper 117017, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Feb 2023.
    14. Joseph Kolawole Abon & Emmanuel Jean-Francois, 2022. "Faculty Initiative and Level of Experience in a U.S. University in Internationalizing their Curriculum to Foster Student Glocal Competence," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 10(3), pages 178-196.
    15. Jennifer Tupper & Ömer Cem Karacaoğlu, 2025. "Access to ınformation and social solidarity in the 2023 Turkey earthquake: disaster education as citizenship education," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Gergely Szolnoki & Maximilian Tafel, 2022. "Environmental Sustainability and Tourism—The Importance of Organic Wine Production for Wine Tourism in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    17. Pang, Qingyun & Hao, Fei & Xiao, Honggen & Bao, Jigang, 2024. "Community empowerment: Pro-poor tourism income distribution," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    18. Chen Kim Lim & Minhaz Farid Ahmed & Mazlin Bin Mokhtar & Kian Lam Tan & Muhammad Zaffwan Idris & Yi Chee Chan, 2021. "Understanding Intangible Culture Heritage Preservation via Analyzing Inhabitants’ Garments of Early 19th Century in Weld Quay, Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-26, May.
    19. Solomon Sambulu Musembi & Dr. Anne Christine Kabui & Dr. Joseph Nzomoi, 2024. "Effect of Composition of Board of Directors on Performance of Mission Hospitals in Kitui County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 973-986, July.
    20. Mohajan, Devajit & Mohajan, Haradhan, 2022. "Feminism and feminist grounded theory: a comprehensive research analysis," MPRA Paper 114914, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jul 2022.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consumer perceptions; vegan food; sustainability; food education; eating style.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:27:y:2025:i:69:p:414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.