IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/apandp/v113y2023p288-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

M&A and Innovation: A New Classification of Patents

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaoqi Cheng
  • Ginger Zhe Jin
  • Mario Leccese
  • Dokyun Lee
  • Liad Wagman

Abstract

Policymakers are increasingly concerned that incumbent acquisitions of small or young firms may slow down rather than speed up innovation, but it is difficult to identify which firms are related in the fast-changing space of technological innovation. This paper proposes a new, data-driven method to classify patent data into tech-business zones on a probabilistic basis, using patent assignee information. After combining mergers and acquisitions data from S&P Global Market Intelligence with PatentsView data from the US Patent and Trademark Office, we discuss how the zone classification can aid merger reviews and other lines of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaoqi Cheng & Ginger Zhe Jin & Mario Leccese & Dokyun Lee & Liad Wagman, 2023. "M&A and Innovation: A New Classification of Patents," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 113, pages 288-293, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:113:y:2023:p:288-93
    DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20231100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20231100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3886/E188121V1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20231100.appx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/pandp.20231100.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/pandp.20231100?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonid Kogan & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Noah Stoffman, 2017. "Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(2), pages 665-712.
    2. Jin, Ginger Zhe & Leccese, Mario & Wagman, Liad, 2023. "How Do Top Acquirers Compare in Technology Mergers? New Evidence from an S&P Taxonomy," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Quan-Jing & Feng, Gen-Fu & Chen, Yin E. & Wen, Jun & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2019. "The impacts of government ideology on innovation: What are the main implications?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1232-1247.
    2. Hickfang, Michael & Holder, Ulrike, 2018. "The impact of stock options on risk-taking: Founder-CEOs and innovation," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 12/2018, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    3. Hasan, Tahseen & John, Kose & Teng, Haimeng & Wu, Qiang, 2024. "Creative corporate culture and corporate tax avoidance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(3).
    4. Ilona Babenko & Benjamin Bennett & John M Bizjak & Jeffrey L Coles & Jason J Sandvik, 2023. "Clawback Provisions and Firm Risk," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 191-239.
    5. Masami Imai & Michiru Sawada, 2022. "Does a Financial Crisis Impair Corporate Innovation?," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2022-002, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    6. Hyoseok (David) Hwang, 2023. "The real effects of local mutual funds: Evidence from corporate innovation," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 272-300, June.
    7. Huffman, Gregory W., 2025. "The stochastic implications of autonomous creation and destruction," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde & Yang Yu & Francesco Zanetti, 2025. "Defensive Hiring and Creative Destruction," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-007, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    9. Ralf Martin & Dennis Verhoeven, 2022. "Knowledge spillovers from clean and emerging technologies in the UK," POID Working Papers 053, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    10. Zhao, Jun & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    11. Maarten De Ridder, 2024. "Market Power and Innovation in the Intangible Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(1), pages 199-251, January.
    12. Kimura, Yosuke, 2024. "Market-based patent value of green transformation technologies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    13. Pauly, Stefan & Stipanicic, Fernando, 2021. "The creation and diffusion of knowledge: Evidence from the Jet Age," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 2112, CEPREMAP.
    14. Bostan, Ibrahim & Mian, G. Mujtaba, 2023. "Do insiders trade on innovation?," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1).
    15. Max Nathan & Anna Rosso, 2017. "Innovative events," Development Working Papers 429, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano, revised 08 Apr 2019.
    16. Simon Kinyua Njeru & Dr. Robert Mang’ana & Dr. Enos Anene, 2025. "Strategy Implementation and Performance of Manufacturing Pharmaceutical Companies in Kenya," Journal of Business and Strategic Management, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 10(5), pages 36-62.
    17. Cascaldi-Garcia, Danilo & Vukoti, Marija & Zubairy, Sarah, 2023. "Innovation During Challenging Times," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1475, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    18. Seul Gi Oh & Kyeongheum Ra, 2024. "Does innovation matter for asymmetric cost behaviour? Evidence from forward citations to the patents," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 64(4), pages 3685-3711, December.
    19. Chen, I-Ju & Hsu, Po-Hsuan & Officer, Micah S. & Wang, Yanzhi, 2020. "The Oscar goes to…: High-tech firms’ acquisitions in response to rivals’ technology breakthroughs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    20. Stephen D Billington & Alan J Hanna, 2021. "That’s classified! Inventing a new patent taxonomy [Text matching to measure patent similarity]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(3), pages 678-705.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:apandp:v:113:y:2023:p:288-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.