IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v2y2013i9p41-75.html

Factors Affecting the Selection of Low-Cost Green Building Materials in Housing Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Ibuchim Cyril Ogunkah
  • Junli Yang

Abstract

This paper is informed by a study conducted to determine how the understanding of the principles of best practices associated with the impacts of low-cost green building materials could be improved to fulfil the objective of their greater use in mainstream housing. The aim of this paper is to address one of the main objectives of this study: to identify the key influential factors that will aid designers in the informed selection of low-cost green building materials and components for sustainable low-cost green housing projects. The findings and results derived through an extensive literature review and a preliminary study with leading experts emphasised the need for appropriate informed data for use in the material selection decision-making process. Solution proposed in this study contributed to the simplification of this task by conducting further surveys with experts who represent various fields in the housing construction industry and research institutions in Nigeria, to examine views and current thinking from leading researchers in the field, and obtain relevant data on issues specific to the critical factors affecting the choice of low cost green building materials. The methodology adopted in undertaking this research was the mixed method approach involving a detailed review of the relevant literature, networking with domain experts and practitioners, knowledge-mining interviews and industry-wide surveys with design and building professionals in Nigeria. A total of 210 out of 480 questionnaires were returned for analysis. A variety of statistical methods within the Statistical Package for the Social Scientist (SPSS v.20) were used to analyse the data collected and identify the key influential factors. The identification hence helped to develop a methodological framework for depicting the ranked factors for sustainable low-cost green housing. The information gathered from the analysis with inputs elicited from domain experts and extensive literature review will be used to further develop a Multi-Criteria Material Selection Decision Support System (MSDSS), and later to be refined with feedbacks obtained from selected expert builder and developer companies. The rationale of this paper is inevitably built on the ground that the identified factors; site-related issues, cost effectiveness, environmental impacts, socio-cultural impacts, sensorial effects, and technical performance are crucial in ensuring the design of sustainable low-cost green housing in Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibuchim Cyril Ogunkah & Junli Yang, 2013. "Factors Affecting the Selection of Low-Cost Green Building Materials in Housing Construction," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(09), pages 41-75, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:9:p:41-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/281
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V220130934.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezekiel Chinyio & Paul Olomolaiye & Simon Kometa & Frank Harris, 1998. "A needs-based methodology for classifying construction clients and selecting contractors," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 91-98.
    2. Mohammed Fadhil Dulaimi & Florence Ling & Arun Bajracharya, 2003. "Organizational motivation and inter-organizational interaction in construction innovation in Singapore," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 307-318.
    3. P. Zhou & B. Ang & D. Zhou, 2010. "Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(1), pages 169-181, March.
    4. T. J. Foxon & G. Mcilkenny & D. Gilmour & C. Oltean-Dumbrava & N. Souter & R. Ashley & D. Butler & P. Pearson & P. Jowitt & J. Moir, 2002. "Sustainability Criteria for Decision Support in the UK Water Industry," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 285-301.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O. Flores Baquero & J. Gallego-Ayala & R. Giné-Garriga & A. Jiménez-Fernández. Palencia & A. Pérez-Foguet, 2017. "The Influence of the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation Normative Content in Measuring the Level of Service," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 763-786, September.
    2. Nicky Rogge & Emilia Konttinen, 2018. "Social Inclusion in the EU Since the Enlargement: Progress or Regress?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 563-584, January.
    3. Maricic, Milica & Bulajic, Milica & Dobrota, Marina & Jeremic, Veljko, 2016. "Redesigning The Global Food Security Index: A Multivariate Composite I-Distance Indicator Approach," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 4(01), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Stefan Geyler & Norman Bedtke & Erik Gawel, 2019. "Sustainable Stormwater Management in Existing Settlements—Municipal Strategies and Current Governance Trends in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Akbari, Negar & Jones, Dylan & Arabikhan, Farzad, 2021. "Goal programming models with interval coefficients for the sustainable selection of marine renewable energy projects in the UK," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 748-760.
    6. Carrillo, Marianela & Jorge, Jesús M., 2017. "Multidimensional Analysis of Regional Tourism Sustainability in Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 89-98.
    7. Kounetas, Konstantinos & Stergiou, Eirini, 2019. "Examining eco-efficiency convergence of European Industries.The existence of technological spillovers within a metafrontier framework," MPRA Paper 94286, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Giambona, Francesca & Magrini, Alessandro & Fusco, Elisa, 2024. "Assessing tourism sustainability in European Union countries: A multi-directional benefit of the doubt composite indicator," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    9. Kumar Virender & Pandey Amrendra & Singh Rahul, 2023. "Project success and critical success factors of construction projects: project practitioners’ perspectives," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Antonio Sianes & Manuel Dorado-Moreno & César Hervás-Martínez, 2014. "Rating the Rich: An Ordinal Classification to Determine Which Rich Countries are Helping Poorer Ones the Most," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 47-65, March.
    11. Rogge, Nicky, 2018. "Composite indicators as generalized benefit-of-the-doubt weighted averages," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 381-392.
    12. Wang, H., 2015. "A generalized MCDA–DEA (multi-criterion decision analysis–data envelopment analysis) approach to construct slacks-based composite indicator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 114-122.
    13. Zanella, Andreia & Camanho, Ana S. & Dias, Teresa G., 2015. "Undesirable outputs and weighting schemes in composite indicators based on data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 517-530.
    14. Diogo Ferraz & Enzo B. Mariano & Daisy Rebelatto & Dominik Hartmann, 2020. "Linking Human Development and the Financial Responsibility of Regions: Combined Index Proposals Using Methods from Data Envelopment Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 439-478, July.
    15. Diego García‐Vélez & José J. Nuñez Velázquez, 2021. "A network analysis approach in multidimensional poverty," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 59-68, March.
    16. Muhammad Ikram, 2025. "Assessing Food Security and Environmental Sustainability in North Africa: A Composite Indicator Approach Using Data Envelopment Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-45, June.
    17. Hatefi, S.M. & Torabi, S.A., 2010. "A common weight MCDA-DEA approach to construct composite indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 114-120, November.
    18. Sandra E. Parada & Olga Blasco-Blasco & Vicente Liern, 2019. "Adequacy Indicators Based on Pre-established Goals: An Implementation in a Colombian University," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 1-24, May.
    19. repec:osf:metaar:d5y26_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Hesam Mohseni & Tuomo Kujala & Johanna Silvennoinen, 2026. "Toward Measuring Geographical Belongingness in a Mobile, Hybrid Globe – Development of a Place-Belongingness Scale Among Immigrants," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 1-23, January.
    21. Blancard, Stéphane & Hoarau, Jean-François, 2013. "A new sustainable human development indicator for small island developing states: A reappraisal from data envelopment analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 623-635.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:9:p:41-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Staff ijSciences to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.