IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acg/journl/v11y2022i1p37-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on the Trade Relationship between China & Mongolia: With Special Focus on Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA)

Author

Listed:
  • Neelofar Rashid

    (University of Kashmir)

  • Mohammad Afzal Mir

    (University of Kashmir)

Abstract

Examining The Composition, Strength, Structure, Comparative Advantage, And Disadvantage Of Bilateral Commerce Between China And Mongolia From 2001 To 2020 Is The Main Goal Of This Article. The Normalised Revealed Comparative Advantage Index (Nrca) Is Used In The Study To Calculate The Composition And Structural Change Of Trade. Although The Nature Of The Trade Between The Two Nations Is Relatively Complementary, The Report Finds That The Potential For Trade Has Significantly Grown Over The Course Of The Study Period. Another Interesting Observation Is That China Imports A Significant Amount Of Goods From Mongolia, Which Has A Lot Of Mineral Resources. Due To China's Preference For High-Tech Items And Comparative Advantage In Labor-Intensive Products, Technology Products Are Starting To Gain Popularity. The Majority Of China's Exports To Mongolia Are Labor-Intensive, Low-Tech, And Low-Value Goods. To Meet The Demands Of Domestic Industry And Daily Living, Mongolia Imports These Labor-Intensive Goods, Enabling The Growth Of A Mutually Advantageous Partnership Between The Two Sides. In Addition, Only The Top 10 To 15 Commodities Accounts For The Majority of China's Overall Imports From Mongolia, And The Percentage Share Of Other Goods Has Remained Under 1% Throughout Time.

Suggested Citation

  • Neelofar Rashid & Mohammad Afzal Mir, 2022. "A Study on the Trade Relationship between China & Mongolia: With Special Focus on Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA)," Shanlax International Journal of Economics, Shanlax Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 37-45, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:acg:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:37-45
    DOI: 10.34293/economics.v11i1.5784
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.shanlaxjournals.in/journals/index.php/economics/article/view/5784
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.shanlaxjournals.in/journals/index.php/economics/article/view/5784/5393
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.34293/economics.v11i1.5784?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byambasuren, Tsenguunjav & Gochoo, Munkh-Erdene, 2015. "Optimizing the Structure of Mongolian Foreign Trade and the Alternative Policy of Successful Transition," MPRA Paper 61803, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Sun, Peng & Heshmati, Almas, 2010. "International Trade and its Effects on Economic Growth in China," IZA Discussion Papers 5151, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Ayyub, Salahuddin, 2012. "Indo-China trade relations:present trends and future prospects," MPRA Paper 84156, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. James R. Markusen, 1995. "The Boundaries of Multinational Enterprises and the Theory of International Trade," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(2), pages 169-189, Spring.
    5. Prabir De & Sreya Pan, 2017. "India-Mongolia Economic Relations: Current Status and Future Prospect," The Northeast Asian Economic Review, ERINA - Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia, vol. 5(2), pages 31-47, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Shanmugam, 2020. "Research and Development Intensity and Effective Tax Rate: Empirical Evidence from India," Emerging Economy Studies, International Management Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 223-234, November.
    2. Edward L. Glaeser & Giacomo A. M. Ponzetto, 2010. "Did the Death of Distance Hurt Detroit and Help New York?," NBER Chapters, in: Agglomeration Economics, pages 303-337, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Markusen, James R. & Venables, Anthony J., 1999. "Foreign direct investment as a catalyst for industrial development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 335-356, February.
    4. Chrysovalantou Milliou, 2014. "Location for Foreign Direct Investment in Vertically Related Markets," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 326-341, May.
    5. Jingyuan Hou & Zhonghai Cheng & Xinshu Gong, 2022. "The Effect of Exports and Two-Way Foreign Direct Investment between China and Pan-East Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. de la Tour, Arnaud & Glachant, Matthieu & Ménière, Yann, 2011. "Innovation and international technology transfer: The case of the Chinese photovoltaic industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 761-770, February.
    7. Rainer Andergassen & Guido Candela, 2013. "Less Developed Countries, Tourism Investments and Local Economic Development," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 16-33, February.
    8. Marcella Nicolini & Laura Resmini, 2006. "The Impact of Mnes on Domestic Firms in CEECS: A Micro-Econometric Approach," ERSA conference papers ersa06p411, European Regional Science Association.
    9. Jozef Konings & Alan Patrick Murphy, 2006. "Do Multinational Enterprises Relocate Employment to Low-Wage Regions? Evidence from European Multinationals," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 142(2), pages 267-286, July.
    10. Kazunobu Hayakawa & Kiyoyasu Tanaka & Yasushi Ueki, 2013. "Transport Modal Choice by Multinational Firms: Firm-level Evidence from Southeast Asia," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 609-623, December.
    11. Greenaway, David & Görg, Holger, 2002. "Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Investment?," CEPR Discussion Papers 3485, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Olivier Godart & Holger Görg & David Greenaway, 2013. "Domestic multinationals, foreign affiliates, and labour demand elasticities," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 149(4), pages 611-630, December.
    13. Smarzynska Javorcik, Beata, 2004. "The composition of foreign direct investment and protection of intellectual property rights: Evidence from transition economies," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 39-62, February.
    14. Uwe Jirjahn, 2021. "Foreign ownership and intra-firm union density in Germany," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(4), pages 1052-1079, November.
    15. Devereux, Michael P. & Griffith, Rachel, 1998. "Taxes and the location of production: evidence from a panel of US multinationals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 335-367, June.
    16. Eiichi Tomiura, 2005. "Technological Capability and FDI in Asia: Firm‐level Relationships among Japanese Manufacturers," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 273-289, September.
    17. Merlevede, Bruno & Schoors, Koen & Spatareanu, Mariana, 2014. "FDI Spillovers and Time since Foreign Entry," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 108-126.
    18. Maria Cipollina & Giorgia Giovannetti & Filomena Pietrovito & Alberto F. Pozzolo, 2012. "FDI and Growth: What Cross-country Industry Data Say," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(11), pages 1599-1629, November.
    19. Jozef Konings & Patrick Van Cayseele & Frédéric Warzynski, 2010. "The Implementation of National Competition Policy Law and the Dynamics of Price–Cost Margins: Evidence from Belgium and the Netherlands 1993–1999," Chapters, in: Jean-Luc Gaffard & Evens Salies (ed.), Innovation, Economic Growth and the Firm, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Karl‐Markus Modén & Pehr‐Johan Norbäck & Lars Persson, 2008. "Efficiency and Ownership Structure: The Case of Poland," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 437-460, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acg:journl:v:11:y:2022:i:1:p:37-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: S.Lakshmanan (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.