IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2025id2837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Personnel Attitudes toward the Implementation of AI Solutions: A Pilot Study in the Transport Sector

Author

Listed:
  • A. B. Demarev
  • I. E. Petrova

Abstract

This article is devoted to analyzing the attitude of personnel in a transport enterprise towards the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) for monitoring operator states. Drawing on the diffusion of innovations, technology acceptance and change management frameworks, it hypothesises that acceptance is shaped not only by technical features but also by psychological, socio cultural and communicative factors.The empirical foundation includes two sequentially connected stages: prototype testing in a simulation environment and field trials during real operations.The method involved semi-structured interviews with 20 employees (purposeful selection by work experience and age), followed by thematic and frequency analysis; to compare subjective “before/after†assessments, a nonparametric test of differences was applied. The findings show that the acceptance of an AI solution is determined not only by technical parameters but also by psychological, sociocultural, and communicative factors: perceptions of “observability†and control, algorithmic transparency, ergonomics, and staff participation in refinement.Based on the data, managerial mechanisms for reducing resistance are proposed: extended communication and explainability, user involvement in iterative design, targeted training, and a structured feedback protocol. Thus, an empirically grounded model of guided AI implementation in high-responsibility organizations is proposed, relevant for the practices of state and municipal governance.Â

Suggested Citation

  • A. B. Demarev & I. E. Petrova, 2025. "Personnel Attitudes toward the Implementation of AI Solutions: A Pilot Study in the Transport Sector," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 5.
  • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2025:id:2837
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/2837/2076
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    2. Stacie Petter & William DeLone & Ephraim McLean, 2008. "Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 236-263, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaimuk Panitkulpong & Amnuay Saengnoree & Thapong Teerawatananond, 2024. "Financial Innovation and Crowdfunding: Influencing Investment Decisions in Tech Startups," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Mohammed Saleh Al-Tuhaifi & Souad Kamoun CHOUK, 2024. "Main Factors Affecting Successful Adoption of Management Information System in Yemen Mobile Phone Enterprises," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(1), pages 825-835, January.
    3. Rajat Kumar Behera & Pradip Kumar Bala & Arghya Ray, 2024. "Cognitive Chatbot for Personalised Contextual Customer Service: Behind the Scene and beyond the Hype," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 899-919, June.
    4. Debarun Chakraborty, 2019. "Indian Shoppers’ Attitude Towards Grocery Shopping Apps: A Survey Conducted on Smartphone Users," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 18(2), pages 83-91, December.
    5. Benjamin T. Hazen & Robert E. Overstreet & Yacan Wang, 2015. "Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Meena, Rahul & Sarabhai, Samar, 2023. "Extrinsic and intrinsic motivators for usage continuance of hedonic mobile apps," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Mamonov, Stanislav & Benbunan-Fich, Raquel, 2017. "Exploring factors affecting social e-commerce service adoption: The case of Facebook Gifts," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 590-600.
    8. O'Connor, Genevieve E. & Myrden, Susan & Alkire (née Nasr), Linda & Lee, Kyungwon & Köcher, Sören & Kandampully, Jay & Williams, Jerome D., 2021. "Digital Health Experience: A Regulatory Focus Perspective," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 121-136.
    9. Asghar Bagheri & Abolmohammad Bondori & Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari & Jhalukpreya Surujlal, 2021. "Use of biologic inputs among cereal farmers: application of technology acceptance model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5165-5181, April.
    10. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt095934s0, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    11. Alharmoodi, Ahmed Abdulla & Khan, Mehmood & Mertzanis, Charilaos & Gupta, Shivam & Mikalef, Patrick & Parida, Vinit, 2024. "Co-creation and critical factors for the development of an efficient public e-tourism system," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Wesam Fallatah & Joakim Kävrestad & Steven Furnell, 2024. "Establishing a Model for the User Acceptance of Cybersecurity Training," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Obuobi, Bright & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Wang, Hong & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Who will adopt? Investigating the adoption intention for battery swap technology for electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Karina Cicha & Mariia Rizun & Paulina Rutecka & Artur Strzelecki, 2021. "COVID-19 and Higher Education: First-Year Students’ Expectations toward Distance Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Yang-Chieh Chin, 2016. "Consumer Acceptance of Online Complaint Forms: An Integration of TPB, TAM and Values Perspective," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 265-279, December.
    16. Amaro, Suzanne & Duarte, Paulo, 2015. "An integrative model of consumers' intentions to purchase travel online," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 64-79.
    17. Mar Souto-Romero & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo & Mario Arias-Oliva & Ala Ali Almahameed, 2024. "Consumer acceptance of robotic surgeons in health services," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Adel Bessadok & Hisham Bardesi, 2023. "Exploring Human Values and Students’ Aspiration in E-Learning Adoption: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    20. Kim, Nooree & Park, Yuri & Lee, Daeho, 2019. "Differences in consumer intention to use on-demand automobile-related services in accordance with the degree of face-to-face interactions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 277-286.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2025:id:2837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.