IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aat/journl/y2014i1p155-159.html

Multidimensional Vision On The Rdi Statistics In The International Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Iulita BIRCA

    (junior scientific researcher, NIER)

  • Tatiana PARVAN

    (IDIS “Viitorul”)

Abstract

This article reflects the evolution in time of visions and approaches of the RDI in international experience, revealing the consequences that have resulted from the application of changes to standardize the statistical evaluation of the RDI sector in the process of creating a knowledge-based economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulita BIRCA & Tatiana PARVAN, 2014. "Multidimensional Vision On The Rdi Statistics In The International Experience," Economy and Sociology, The Journal Economy and Sociology, issue 1, pages 155-159.
    • Handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:155-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://old.economy-sociology.ince.md/?edmc=816
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(3), pages 297-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weber, Karl Matthias & Giesecke, Susanne & Havas, Attila & Schartinger, Doris & Albiez, Andreas & Horak, Sophia & Blind, Knut & Bodenheimer, Miriam & Daimer, Stephanie & Shi, Liu & Stadler, Maria & Sc, 2024. "Social innovation - (Accompanying) instrument for addressing societal challenges?," Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem 10-2024, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin.
    2. Arash Mousavi & Reza Hafezi & Hasan Ahmadi, 2023. "Examining psychology of science as a potential contributor to science policy," Papers 2309.09202, arXiv.org.
    3. Ghebrihiwet, Nahom, 2019. "FDI technology spillovers in the mining industry: Lessons from South Africa's mining sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 463-471.
    4. Lily Fang & Josh Lerner & Chaopeng Wu & Qi Zhang, 2023. "Anticorruption, Government Subsidies, and Innovation: Evidence from China," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4363-4388, August.
    5. Martin Kenney & Donald Patton, 2018. "Sub-national technology policy and commerce: evaluating the impacts of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 47-68, February.
    6. Mowery, David C. & Nelson, Richard R. & Sampat, Bhaven N. & Ziedonis, Arvids A., 2001. "The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 99-119, January.
    7. Gerhard Streicher & Andreas Schibany & Nikolaus Gretzmacher, 2004. "Input Additionality Effects of R&D Subsidies in Austria. Empirical Evidence from Firm-level Panel Data," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 25159.
    8. Adam B. Jaffe & Josh Lerner, 1999. "Privatizing R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies," NBER Working Papers 7064, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Stöver, Britta, 2019. "The regional significance of university locations in Lower Saxony," Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) dp-654, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät.
    10. Ozgur Aydogmus & Erkan Gürpinar, 2022. "Science, Technology and Institutional Change in Knowledge Production: An Evolutionary Game Theoretic Framework," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 1163-1188, December.
    11. Tabakovic, Haris & Wollmann, Thomas G., 2019. "The impact of money on science: Evidence from unexpected NCAA football outcomes," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. Chia-Hui Huang, 2015. "Tax credits and total factor productivity: firm-level evidence from Taiwan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 40(6), pages 932-947, December.
    13. Abraham Garcia, 2011. "The European Research Framework Programme and innovation performance of companies. An empirical impact assessment using a CDM model," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2011-07, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Scarrà, Deepa & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2022. "The impact of technology transfer and knowledge spillover from Big Science: a literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. Stephan, Paula E., 2010. "The Economics of Science," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 217-273, Elsevier.
    16. Paul A. David, 2001. "From Keeping 'Nature's Secrets' to the Institutionalization of 'Open Science'," Working Papers 01006, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
    17. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "A Summary of Arguments for and Against the Public Provision of Agricultural R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232789, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    18. Darcy W E Allen, 2020. "When Entrepreneurs Meet:The Collective Governance of New Ideas," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number q0269.
    19. Butos William N. & Boettke Peter J., 2002. "Kirznerian Entrepreneurship and The Economics of Science," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, March.
    20. Wu, Ting & Yang, Shuwang & Tan, Jingjing, 2020. "Impacts of government R&D subsidies on venture capital and renewable energy investment -- an empirical study in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development
    • O1 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aat:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:155-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iordachi Victoria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iefscmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.