Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Empirische Studien zum Capability Ansatz auf der Grundlage von Befragungen: Ein Überblick

Contents:

Author Info

  • Leßmann, Ortrud
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Obwohl die Frage, ob der Capability Ansatz überhaupt operationalisierbar ist, von Beginn an und bis heute diskutiert wird, gibt es inzwischen eine Fülle von empirischen Studien auf der Grundlage des Capability Ansatzes. Die meisten basieren auf Daten aus Befragungen (im Unterschied zu bspw. anthropometrischen Daten und solchen aus der volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung). Zwei Eigenschaften des Capability Ansatzes stellen bei der Operationalisierung eine besondere Herausforderung dar: Seine Multidimensionalität und die besondere Bedeutung, die er der Handlungsfreiheit des Menschen beimisst. Schon die Auswahl von Dimensionen, die für eine Studie relevant sind, nötigt dem Forscher eine Vielzahl von Entscheidungen ab und ist nicht einfach zu lösen. Um darüber hinaus den Handlungsspielraum eines Menschen in Form der Menge an Verwirklichungschancen (capability set) zu erfassen, muss der Forscher hypothetische Überlegungen einbeziehen. Es haben sich zwei Strategien herausgebildet, dies zu tun: Die erste Strategie setzt auf die Verwendung bestimmter Analyseverfahren bei der Auswertung von Sekundärdaten (also von Daten, die nicht zum Zweck einer Capability-Analyse erhoben wurden). Die zweite Strategie trachtet danach, durch geeignete Fragen den Möglichkeitsaspekt zu berücksichtigen, und zielt daher auf die Erhebung von Primärdaten unter Einbeziehung solcher Fragen. Der Aufsatz gibt einen Überblick sowohl zu den erwähnten Hauptproblemen bei der Operationalisierung als auch zu den vorhandenen empirischen Studien. Von diesen werden zunächst die zahlreichen Sekundärstudien mit ihrer Fülle von unterschiedlichen Methoden und Forschungsfragen vorgestellt und in einem weiteren Abschnitt die beiden wichtigsten Projekte zur Erhebung von Primärdaten sowie deren Nutzung in einem kleinen Projekt der Autorin. --

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/48675/1/664248365.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS) in its series UFZ Discussion Papers with number 4/2011.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 2011
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:42011

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig
    Phone: ++49 - 0341 - 235-2771
    Fax: ++49 - 0341 - 235-2825
    Web page: http://www.ufz.de/index.php?en=1445
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Mozaffar Qizilbash & David Clark, 2005. "The Capability Approach and Fuzzy Poverty Measures: An Application to the South African Context," Social Indicators Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 103-139, October.
    2. Maria Laura Di Tommaso, 2006. "Measuring the well being of children using a capability approach An application to Indian data," CHILD Working Papers, CHILD - Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics - ITALY wp05_06, CHILD - Centre for Household, Income, Labour and Demographic economics - ITALY.
    3. Rahman, Tauhidur & Mittelhammer, Ron C. & Wandschneider, Philip, 2005. "Measuring the Quality of Life across Countries: A Sensitivity Analysis of Well-being Indices," Working Paper Series, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER) RP2005/06, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Paul Anand & Cristina Santos & Ron Smith, 2007. "The measurement of capabilities," Open Discussion Papers in Economics, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics 67, The Open University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
    5. Solava Ibrahim & Sabina Alkire, 2007. "Agency and Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 379-403.
    6. Christian Arndt & Jürgen Volkert, 2007. "A Capability Approach for Official German Poverty and Wealth Reports: Conceptual Background and First Empirical Results," IAW Discussion Papers, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW) 27, Institut für Angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW).
    7. Marco Grasso, 2002. "A Dynamic Operationalization of Sen’s Capability Approach," Working Papers, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics 59, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2002.
    8. Maria Ana Lugo, 2007. "Employment: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp003, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    9. Yélé Batana, 2013. "Multidimensional Measurement of Poverty Among Women in Sub-Saharan Africa," Social Indicators Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 337-362, June.
    10. Shoutir Kishore Chatterjee, 2005. "Measurement of Human Development: an alternative approach," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 31-44.
    11. Paul Anand & Graham Hunter & Ian Carter & Keith Dowding & Francesco Guala & Martin Van Hees, 2009. "The Development of Capability Indicators," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 125-152.
    12. Arcelus, F.J. & Sharma, B. & Srinivasan, G., 2005. "The Human Development Index Adjusted for Efficient Resource Utilization," Working Paper Series, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER) RP2005/08, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Alkire, Sabina & Foster, James, 2011. "Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 95(7), pages 476-487.
    14. Alkire, Sabina, 2008. "Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty," MPRA Paper 8862, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Suman Seth, 2009. "Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 375-396.
    16. L. Quadrado & W. Heijman & H. Folmer, 2001. "Multidimensional Analysis of Regional Inequality: The case of Hungary," Social Indicators Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 21-42, October.
    17. Phipps, Shelley, 2002. "The Well-Being of Young Canadian Children in International Perspective: A Functionings Approach," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 48(4), pages 493-515, December.
    18. Sabina Alkire, 2007. "The Missing Dimensions of Poverty Data: An Introduction," OPHI Working Papers ophiwp001, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    19. Gustav Ranis & Frances Stewart & Emma Samman, 2005. "Human Development: Beyond the HDI," Working Papers, Economic Growth Center, Yale University 916, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
    20. Binder, Martin & Broekel, Tom, 2008. "Conversion Efficiency as a Complementing Measure of Welfare in Capability Space," MPRA Paper 7583, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Carmen Herrero, 1996. "Capabilities and utilities," Review of Economic Design, Springer, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 69-88, December.
    22. Baliamoune-Lutz, Mina N., 2004. "On the Measurement of Human Well-being: Fuzzy Set Theory and Sen's Capability Approach," Working Paper Series, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER) UNU-WIDER Research Paper , World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    23. Paul Anand & Graham Hunter & Ron Smith, 2005. "Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare," Social Indicators Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 9-55, October.
    24. James Foster & Luis Lopez-Calva & Miguel Szekely, 2005. "Measuring the Distribution of Human Development: methodology and an application to Mexico," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 5-25.
    25. Sabina Alkire, 2005. "Why the Capability Approach?," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 115-135.
    26. Xavier Ramos & Jacques Silber, 2005. "On The Application Of Efficiency Analysis To The Study Of The Dimensions Of Human Development ," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 51(2), pages 285-309, 06.
    27. Emma Samman, 2007. "Psychological and Subjective Well-being: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indicators," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 459-486.
    28. Mozaffar Qizilbash, 2001. "Vague language and precise measurement: the case of poverty," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 41-58.
    29. Anand, Paul & van Hees, Martin, 2006. "Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 268-284, April.
    30. Jaya Krishnakumar & A. Nagar, 2008. "On Exact Statistical Properties of Multidimensional Indices Based on Principal Components, Factor Analysis, MIMIC and Structural Equation Models," Social Indicators Research, Springer, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 481-496, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:42011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.