An evolutionary model is used to examine how the presence of strategic risk and exclusion in interactions on the basis of economic class differences (assortive matching) can explain persistent inequality. A large population of agents is matched asynchronously according to a wealth-weighted probability distribution to play a 2 x 2 coordination game with a Pareto dominant equilibrium and a risk dominant equilibrium. Best response dynamics eventually select the inferior equilibrium, but with sufficiently strong exclusion inequality arises and persists for arbitrarily long finite periods. In particular, exclusion increases the probability that an upper class will arise. In an environment with strategic risk, exclusion helps preserve confidence in the good equilibrium strategy but also perpetuates inequality.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Santa Fe Institute in its series Working Papers with number
99-08-056.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
George J. Mailath & Larry Samuelson & Avner Shaked, 1997.
"Endogenous Interactions,"
CARESS Working Papres
endo-one, University of Pennsylvania Center for Analytic Research and Economics in the Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]
Roger B. Myerson, 1990.
"Viscous Population Equilibria,"
Discussion Papers
906, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]