This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Open Source Development in a Differentiated Duopoly

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Stephane Verani () (Department of Economics, The University of Western Australia)
Abstract

Open source software is released under an open source license giving individuals the right to use, modify, and redistribute freely the programs. This paper proposes a model of differentiated duopoly in which firms invest in the development of proprietary or open source software. The main findings are: (i) firms invest more when the products are substitutes; (ii) for substitute products, firms’ investment in software development is greatest when the software is open source; (iii) for close to perfect complements, firms’ investment in software development is greatest when the software is proprietary; and (iv) for substitute products, investment in open source software yields higher profits than investment in proprietary software.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.biz.uwa.edu.au/home/research/discussionworking_papers/economics?f=147008
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2006
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics in its series Economics Discussion / Working Papers with number 06-05.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 28 pages
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:06-05

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 65 Stirling Highway, Crawley, W.A. 6009
Phone: (08) 9380 2918
Fax: (08) 9380 1016
Web page: http://www.biz.uwa.edu.au
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.ecom.uwa.edu.au/research/discussion_papersworking_documents/economics

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Callum Jones) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Callum Jones to update the entry or send us the correct address..

Related research
Keywords:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Nirvikar Singh & Xavier Vives, 1984. "Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(4), pages 546-554, Winter. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2003. "The Scope of Open Source Licensing," Levine's Bibliography 506439000000000140, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Avinash Dixit, 1979. "A Model of Duopoly Suggesting a Theory of Entry Barriers," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 20-32, Spring. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  4. Hackner, Jonas, 2000. "A Note on Price and Quantity Competition in Differentiated Oligopolies," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 233-239, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  5. Hertel, Guido & Niedner, Sven & Herrmann, Stefanie, 2003. "Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1159-1177, July. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Justin Pappas Johnson, 2002. "Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 637-662, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  7. Amir, Rabah & Wooders, John, 2000. "One-Way Spillovers, Endogenous Innovator/Imitator Roles, and Research Joint Ventures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-25, April. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  8. Michael Katz & Richard Gilbert, 2001. "An Economist's Guide to U.S. v Microsoft," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series CPC01-019, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Josh Lerner & Jean Tirole, 2004. "The Economics of Technology Sharing: Open Source and Beyond," NBER Working Papers 10956, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  10. Alexandre Gaudeul, 2004. "Competition between open-source and proprietary software: the (La)TeX case study," Industrial Organization 0409007, EconWPA. [Downloadable!]
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Over 1000 institutions contribute their bibliographic data directly to this service.

This page was last updated on 2009-10-18.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.