This paper considers an important practical problem in testing time-series data for nonlinearity in mean. Most popular tests reject the null hypothesis of linearity too frequently if the the data are heteroskedastic. Two approaches to redressing this size distortion are considered, both of which have been proposed previously in the literature although not in relation to this particular problem. These are the heteroskedasticity-robust-auxiliary-regression approach and the wild bootstrap. Simulation results indicate that both approaches are effective in reducing the size distortion and that the wild bootstrap others better performance in smaller samples. Two practical examples are then used to illustrate the procedures and demonstrate the potential pitfalls encountered when using non-robust tests.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by National Centre for Econometric Research in its series NCER Working Paper Series with number
8.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
M. Hashem Pesaran & Yongcheol Shin, 2002.
"Long-Run Structural Modelling,"
Econometric Reviews,
Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 49-87.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: