What is the cost of retaining and attracting exceptional talents? Evidence from the Canada Research Chair program
AbstractThe compensation of a professor who is awarded an internal Canada Research Chair (CRC) increases by 6.3 percent on average in our sample. This gain is large initially but quickly erodes over CRC tenure. The gain is slightly larger for professors who change university to obtain a CRC Chair. Assuming that the CRC program has achieved its goal of attracting and retaining top talents, we infer that the compensation cost of doing so is modest. In addition, only a small fraction of the CRC grants have been passed through to professors as compensation increases. This is despite the fact that universities report spending more than half of the CRC grants on chairholder compensation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Queen's University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 1294.
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: Feb 2012
Date of revision:
Compensation; Brain Drain; Crowding Out; Canada Research Chair;
Other versions of this item:
- Courty, Pascal & Sim, John, 2012. "What is the cost of retaining and attracting exceptional talents? Evidence from the Canada Research Chair program," CEPR Discussion Papers 8966, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
- J23 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Demand
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- John Gibson & David McKenzie, 2011.
"Eight Questions about Brain Drain,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
American Economic Association, vol. 25(3), pages 107-28, Summer.
- Gibson, John & McKenzie, David, 2011. "Eight Questions about Brain Drain," IZA Discussion Papers 5730, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Gibson, John & McKenzie, David, 2011. "Eight questions about brain drain," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5668, The World Bank.
- John Gibson & David McKenzie, 2011. "Eight Questions about Brain Drain," CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1111, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), Department of Economics, University College London.
- Ehrenberg, R.G.Ronald G., 2004. "Econometric studies of higher education," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1-2), pages 19-37.
- Haeck, Catherine & Verboven, Frank, 2010.
"The Internal Economics of a University - Evidence from Personnel Data,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
7843, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Catherine Haeck & Frank Verboven, 2012. "The Internal Economics of a University: Evidence from Personnel Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 591 - 626.
- Catherine HAECK & Frank VERBOVEN, 2010. "The internal economics of a university - evidence from personnel data," Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers ces10.18, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
- Ronald G. Ehrenberg & Michael J. Rizzo & George H. Jakubson, 2003. "Who Bears the Growing Cost of Science at Universities?," NBER Working Papers 9627, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Mark Babcock).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.