Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The best estimation for high-dimensional Markowitz mean-variance optimization

Contents:

Author Info

  • Bai, Zhidong
  • Li, Hua
  • Wong, Wing-Keung

Abstract

The traditional(plug-in) return for the Markowitz mean-variance (MV) optimization has been demonstrated to seriously overestimate the theoretical optimal return, especially when the dimension to sample size ratio $p/n$ is large. The newly developed bootstrap-corrected estimator corrects the overestimation, but it incurs the "under-prediction problem," it does not do well on the estimation of the corresponding allocation, and it has bigger risk. To circumvent these limitations and to improve the optimal return estimation further, this paper develops the theory of spectral-corrected estimation. We first establish a theorem to explain why the plug-in return greatly overestimates the theoretical optimal return. We prove that under some situations the plug-in return is $\sqrt{\gamma}\ $\ times bigger than the theoretical optimal return, while under other situations, the plug-in return is bigger than but may not be $\sqrt{\gamma}\ $\ times larger than its theoretic counterpart where $\gamma = \frac 1{1-y}$ with $y$ being the limit of the ratio $p/n$. Thereafter, we develop the spectral-corrected estimation for the Markowitz MV model which performs much better than both the plug-in estimation and the bootstrap-corrected estimation not only in terms of the return but also in terms of the allocation and the risk. We further develop properties for our proposed estimation and conduct a simulation to examine the performance of our proposed estimation. Our simulation shows that our proposed estimation not only overcomes the problem of "over-prediction," but also circumvents the "under-prediction," "allocation estimation," and "risk" problems. Our simulation also shows that our proposed spectral-corrected estimation is stable for different values of sample size $n$, dimension $p$, and their ratio $p/n$. In addition, we relax the normality assumption in our proposed estimation so that our proposed spectral-corrected estimators could be obtained when the returns of the assets being studied could follow any distribution under the condition of the existence of the fourth moments.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43862/
File Function: original version
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 43862.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 10 Jan 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43862

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Markowitz mean-variance optimization; Optimal Return; Optimal Portfolio Allocation; Large Random Matrix; Bootstrap Method;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Soyer, Refik & Tanyeri, Kadir, 2006. "Bayesian portfolio selection with multi-variate random variance models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 171(3), pages 977-990, June.
  2. Fu, Chenpeng & Lari-Lavassani, Ali & Li, Xun, 2010. "Dynamic mean-variance portfolio selection with borrowing constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 312-319, January.
  3. Wai Fong & Wing Wong, 2006. "The modified mixture of distributions model: a revisit," Annals of Finance, Springer, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 167-178, March.
  4. Clark, Peter K, 1973. "A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 41(1), pages 135-55, January.
  5. Blattberg, Robert C & Gonedes, Nicholas J, 1974. "A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(2), pages 244-80, April.
  6. Andrew W. Lo & A. Craig MacKinlay, 1987. "Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence From a Simple Specification Test," NBER Working Papers 2168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  7. Egozcue, Martín & García, Luis Fuentes & Wong, Wing-Keung & Zitikis, Ricardas, 2011. "Do investors like to diversify? A study of Markowitz preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 215(1), pages 188-193, November.
  8. Andre F. Perold, 1984. "Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 30(10), pages 1143-1160, October.
  9. Yusif Simaan, 1997. "Estimation Risk in Portfolio Selection: The Mean Variance Model Versus the Mean Absolute Deviation Model," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 43(10), pages 1437-1446, October.
  10. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J & Padberg, Manfred W, 1978. "Simple Criteria for Optimal Portfolio Selection: Tracing out the Efficient Frontier," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 33(1), pages 296-302, March.
  11. Bob Korkie & Harry J. Turtle, 2002. "A Mean-Variance Analysis of Self-Financing Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 427-443, March.
  12. Sharpe, William F., 1971. "A Linear Programming Approximation for the General Portfolio Analysis Problem," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(05), pages 1263-1275, December.
  13. repec:wyi:wpaper:001971 is not listed on IDEAS
  14. Wing-Keung Wong, 2007. "Stochastic Dominance and Mean-Variance Measures of Profit and Loss for Business Planning and Investment," SCAPE Policy Research Working Paper Series, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, SCAPE 0705, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics, SCAPE.
  15. Harry Markowitz, 1952. "Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 7(1), pages 77-91, 03.
  16. Zhao, Yonggan & Ziemba, William T., 2008. "Calculating risk neutral probabilities and optimal portfolio policies in a dynamic investment model with downside risk control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 185(3), pages 1525-1540, March.
  17. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, 09.
  18. Jorion, Philippe, 1985. "International Portfolio Diversification with Estimation Risk," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 58(3), pages 259-78, July.
  19. Kan, Raymond & Zhou, Guofu, 2007. "Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(03), pages 621-656, September.
  20. Yu, Mei & Takahashi, Satoru & Inoue, Hiroshi & Wang, Shouyang, 2010. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with risk control for absolute deviation model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 349-364, March.
  21. Simone Manganelli, 2004. "Asset Allocation by Variance Sensitivity Analysis," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Society for Financial Econometrics, vol. 2(3), pages 370-389.
  22. Eugene F. Fama, 1963. "Mandelbrot and the Stable Paretian Hypothesis," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36, pages 420.
  23. Luciano, Elisa & Peccati, Lorenzo & Cifarelli, Donato M., 2003. "VaR as a risk measure for multiperiod static inventory models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 375-384, January.
  24. Dominic Gasbarro & Wing-Keung Wong & J. Kenton Zumwalt, 2007. "Stochastic Dominance Analysis of iShares," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 89-101.
  25. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2004. "A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 365-411, February.
  26. Zymler, Steve & Rustem, Berç & Kuhn, Daniel, 2011. "Robust portfolio optimization with derivative insurance guarantees," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 410-424, April.
  27. Hiroshi Konno & Hiroaki Yamazaki, 1991. "Mean-Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Applications to Tokyo Stock Market," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 519-531, May.
  28. Elton, Edwin J & Gruber, Martin J & Padberg, Manfred W, 1976. "Simple Criteria for Optimal Portfolio Selection," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 31(5), pages 1341-57, December.
  29. Clark, Ephraim & Jokung, Octave & Kassimatis, Konstantinos, 2011. "Making inefficient market indices efficient," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 83-93, February.
  30. Silverstein, J. W. & Choi, S. I., 1995. "Analysis of the Limiting Spectral Distribution of Large Dimensional Random Matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 295-309, August.
  31. Markowitz, Harry M., 1990. "Foundations of Portfolio Theory," Nobel Prize in Economics documents, Nobel Prize Committee 1990-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
  32. Zhidong Bai & Hua Li & Huixia Liu & Wing‐Keung Wong, 2011. "Test statistics for prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominances with applications," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 14(2), pages 278-303, 07.
  33. Chan, Joshua C.C. & Kroese, Dirk P., 2010. "Efficient estimation of large portfolio loss probabilities in t-copula models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 361-367, September.
  34. Jansen, Dennis W. & Li, Qi & Wang, Zijun & Yang, Jian, 2008. "Fiscal policy and asset markets: A semiparametric analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 141-150, November.
  35. Markowitz, Harry M & Perold, Andre F, 1981. "Portfolio Analysis with Factors and Scenarios," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 36(4), pages 871-77, September.
  36. William F. Sharpe, 1967. "A Linear Programming Algorithm for Mutual Fund Portfolio Selection," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 13(7), pages 499-510, March.
  37. Egozcue, Martin & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2010. "Gains from diversification on convex combinations: A majorization and stochastic dominance approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 893-900, February.
  38. Frederick Wong, 2003. "Efficient estimation of covariance selection models," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(4), pages 809-830, December.
  39. Ross, Stephen A., 1976. "The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 341-360, December.
  40. Lam, Kin & Liu, Taisheng & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2010. "A pseudo-Bayesian model in financial decision making with implications to market volatility, under- and overreaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 166-175, May.
  41. Eugene F. Fama, 1965. "Portfolio Analysis in a Stable Paretian Market," Management Science, INFORMS, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 404-419, January.
  42. Ma, Chenghu & Wong, Wing-Keung, 2010. "Stochastic dominance and risk measure: A decision-theoretic foundation for VaR and C-VaR," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 927-935, December.
  43. Kroll, Yoram & Levy, Haim & Markowitz, Harry M, 1984. " Mean-Variance versus Direct Utility Maximization," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 39(1), pages 47-61, March.
  44. Wong, Wing-Keung & Phoon, Kok Fai & Lean, Hooi Hooi, 2008. "Stochastic dominance analysis of Asian hedge funds," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 204-223, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:43862. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.