IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1273-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards more gender equality in Austria

Author

Listed:
  • Volker Ziemann

    (OECD)

Abstract

There is ample empirical evidence for strong and persistent patterns of separated gender roles in Austria. While this model is generally considered to have worked well in the past, it faces important challenges arising from societal and economic changes in Austria. Hence, gender mainstreaming with the aim of more gender equality ranks high on the agenda of Austrian policy makers. An integrated policy framework to make Austria more gender-equal should build on 3 pillars: i) make the tax and benefit system more employment friendly ii) extend the care service infrastructure and iii) encourage more flexible workplace practices. Streamlining family policies across regions and levels of government would entail efficiency gains for all pillars. Long-run simulations suggest that achieving more gender equality in Austria could boost GDP by 13 percentage points until 2060. In addition, promoting more gender equality in the Austrian Society will improve Austrians’ well-being. Vers plus d'égalité entre les sexes en Autriche Il existe de nombreuses données empiriques prouvant qu’en Autriche, le modèle de répartition des rôles entre les hommes et les femmes est profondément enraciné, et qu’il persiste. Alors même qu’on considère généralement que ce modèle a bien fonctionné dans le passé, il est aujourd’hui remis en cause de manière importante par les évolutions sociétales et économiques en cours dans le pays. De ce fait, l’intégration systématique d’une démarche soucieuse de l’égalité entre les sexes visant à favoriser l’égalité hommes-femmes est l’une des priorités des responsables de l’action publique autrichiens. Un cadre d’action publique intégré au service d’une plus grande parité devrait s’articuler autour de trois axes principaux : i) rendre le système de prélèvements et de prestations plus favorable à l’emploi ; ii) développer les infrastructures d’accueil et de soins et iii) favoriser l’adoption de pratiques plus souples dans le monde du travail. Rationaliser les politiques familiales entre les différentes régions et les différents niveaux de l’administration entraînerait des gains d’efficience sous ces trois aspects. Les simulations à long terme montrent qu’une meilleure parité hommes-femmes permettrait à l’Autriche de gagner 13 points de PIB d’ici 2060. En outre, promouvoir l’égalité entre les sexes dans la société autrichienne améliorerait le bien-être de la population.

Suggested Citation

  • Volker Ziemann, 2015. "Towards more gender equality in Austria," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1273, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1273-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5jrp2s4pfbnp-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrp2s4pfbnp-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5jrp2s4pfbnp-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrike Famira-Mühlberger & Matthias Firgo, 2014. "Die Entwicklung des öffentlichen Aufwandes für Pflegedienstleistungen. Projektion für die österreichischen Bundesländer," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 87(9), pages 643-652, September.
    2. de Boer, Henk-Wim & Jongen, Egbert L.W. & Kabatek, Jan, 2022. "The effectiveness of fiscal stimuli for working parents," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    3. Julia Bock-Schappelwein, 2013. "Genderindex 2013. Arbeitsmarktlage und Lebenssituation von Frauen und Männern auf regionaler Ebene in Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 57935, April.
    4. Joost de Laat & Almudena Sevilla-Sanz, 2011. "The Fertility and Women's Labor Force Participation puzzle in OECD Countries: The Role of Men's Home Production," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 87-119.
    5. Åsa Johansson & Yvan Guillemette & Fabrice Murtin & David Turner & Giuseppe Nicoletti & Christine de la Maisonneuve & Philip Bagnoli & Guillaume Bousquet & Francesca Spinelli, 2013. "Long-Term Growth Scenarios," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1000, OECD Publishing.
    6. Harry J. Holzer & David Neumark, 2000. "What Does Affirmative Action Do?," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(2), pages 240-271, January.
    7. Alyssa Schneebaum & Bernhard Rumplmaier & Wilfried Altzinger, 2016. "Gender and migration background in intergenerational educational mobility," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 239-260, June.
    8. Olivier Thévenon, 2013. "Drivers of Female Labour Force Participation in the OECD," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 145, OECD Publishing.
    9. Muriel Niederle & Carmit Segal & Lise Vesterlund, 2013. "How Costly Is Diversity? Affirmative Action in Light of Gender Differences in Competitiveness," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 1-16, May.
    10. Thomas Barnay, 2016. "Health, work and working conditions: a review of the European economic literature," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(6), pages 693-709, July.
    11. Rauf Gönenç & Béatrice Guérard & Isabelle Hassler & Andreas Wörgötter, 2015. "Austria's separate gender roles model was popular in the past, but is becoming a constraint for comprehensive wellbeing," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1272, OECD Publishing.
    12. Andrea Weber & Christine Zulehner, 2014. "Competition And Gender Prejudice: Are Discriminatory Employers Doomed To Fail?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 12(2), pages 492-521, April.
    13. Michael Förster & Gerlinde Verbist, 2012. "Money or Kindergarten? Distributive Effects of Cash Versus In-Kind Family Transfers for Young Children," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 135, OECD Publishing.
    14. María del Carmen Huerta & Willem Adema & Jennifer Baxter & Miles Corak & Mette Deding & Matthew C. Gray & Wen-Jui Han & Jane Waldfogel, 2011. "Early Maternal Employment and Child Development in Five OECD Countries," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 118, OECD Publishing.
    15. Phillips, Anne, 2006. ""Really" equal: opportunities and autonomy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 16831, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Willem Adema & Nabil Ali & Olivier Thévenon, 2014. "Changes in Family Policies and Outcomes: Is there Convergence?," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 157, OECD Publishing.
    17. Michael Soder, 2014. "Die Freizeitoption in Kollektivverträgen," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 127, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    18. Sebastian Klüsener & Karel Neels & Michaela Kreyenfeld, 2013. "Family Policies and the Western European Fertility Divide: Insights from a Natural Experiment in Belgium," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 587-610, December.
    19. Henk-Wim de Boer & Egbert Jongen & Jan Kabatek, 2014. "The effectiveness of fiscal stimuli for working parents," CPB Discussion Paper 286.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    20. Adema, Willem, 2012. "Setting the scene: The mix of family policy objectives and packages across the OECD," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 487-498.
    21. Irene van Staveren, 2014. "The Lehman Sisters hypothesis," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(5), pages 995-1014.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2022. "Familienleistungen der öffentlichen Hand in Österreich. Längerfristige Entwicklungen und aktuelle Reformen," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 95(2), pages 107-121, February.
    2. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2018. "Long-term Trends of Level and Structure of Family Benefits in Austria," WIFO Bulletin, WIFO, vol. 23(8), pages 62-74, July.
    3. Wifo, 2022. "WIFO-Monatsberichte, Heft 2/2022," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 95(2), February.
    4. Margit Schratzenstaller, 2018. "Langfristige Entwicklung von Höhe und Struktur der Familienleistungen in Österreich," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(5), pages 345-358, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Bachtrögler & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Paul Eckerstorfer & Peter Huber & Christine Mayrhuber & Mark Sommer & Gerhard Streicher, 2019. "Wachstumsfaktor Gleichstellung. Der ökonomische Nutzen von Gender Budgeting in Wien," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 65741, April.
    2. Baltrunaite, Audinga & Bello, Piera & Casarico, Alessandra & Profeta, Paola, 2014. "Gender quotas and the quality of politicians," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 62-74.
    3. Thérèse McDonnell, 2016. "Non-cognitive development in infancy: the influence of maternal employment and the mediating role of childcare," Working Papers 201606, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    4. Bettendorf, Leon J.H. & Jongen, Egbert L.W. & Muller, Paul, 2015. "Childcare subsidies and labour supply — Evidence from a large Dutch reform," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 112-123.
    5. Qi Yang & Jianyuan Huang, 2020. "Content Analysis of Family Policy Instruments to Promote the Sustainable Development of Families in China from 1989–2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Kabátek, Jan, 2015. "Essays on public policy and household decision making," Other publications TiSEM 8cdb178e-ad98-42e5-a7e1-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. García-Manglano, Javier & Nollenberger, Natalia & Sevilla, Almudena, 2014. "Gender, Time-Use, and Fertility Recovery in Industrialized Countries," IZA Discussion Papers 8613, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Ji‐Hung Choi & Hannah Oh & John Bae & Sang‐Joon Kim, 2021. "Affirmative action and team performance: An agency theoretic perspective," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1183-1193, July.
    9. International Monetary Fund, 2015. "Germany: Selected Issues," IMF Staff Country Reports 2015/188, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Dilmaghani, Maryam, 2021. "A matter of time: Gender, time constraint, and risk taking among the chess elite," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    11. Lanzi, Elisa & Dellink, Rob & Chateau, Jean, 2018. "The sectoral and regional economic consequences of outdoor air pollution to 2060," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 89-113.
    12. Thomas Buser & Muriel Niederle & Hessel Oosterbeek, 2014. "Gender, Competitiveness, and Career Choices," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 129(3), pages 1409-1447.
    13. Nicolas Hérault & Guyonne Kalb, 2022. "Understanding the rising trend in female labour force participation," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 341-363, December.
    14. Emmanuel Dechenaux & Dan Kovenock & Roman Sheremeta, 2015. "A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 18(4), pages 609-669, December.
    15. Ferreira, Daniel & Ginglinger, Edith & Laguna, Marie-Aude & Skalli, Yasmine, 2017. "Board Quotas and Director-Firm Matching," CEPR Discussion Papers 12117, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Daniel Fackler & Claus Schnabel & Joachim Wagner, 2013. "Establishment exits in Germany: the role of size and age," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 683-700, October.
    17. Buser, Thomas & Ranehill, Eva & van Veldhuizen, Roel, 2021. "Gender differences in willingness to compete: The role of public observability," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Balazs Egert, 2022. "Public policy reforms and their impact on productivity, investment and employment: new evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries," Public Sector Economics, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 46(2), pages 179-205.
    19. Thomas Barnay & Éric Defebvre, 2019. "Gender Differences in the Influence of Mental Health on Job Retention," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 33(4), pages 507-532, December.
    20. Boken, Johannes & Gadenne, Lucie & Nandi, Tushar & Santamaria. Marta, 2022. "Community Networks and Trade," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1442, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Austria; Autriche; family policies; gender equality; politiques familiales; égalité des sexes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies
    • J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1273-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.