This paper argues that public sector labor relations is best understood in a framework that focuses on unions' ability to shift demand curves rather than to raise wages, as is the case in the private sector. It reviews the public sector labor relations literature and finds that: (i) public sector unionism has flourished as a result of changes in laws; (2) the effects of public sector unions on wages are likely to have been underestimated; (3) public sector unions have a somewhat different effect on wage structures than do private sector unions; (4) compulsory arbitration reduces strikes with no clearcut impact on the level of wage settlements; (5) public sector unions have diverse effects on non-wage outcomes as do private sector unions. In terms of evaluating public sector unionism, the paper argues that by raising both the cost of public services (taxes) and the amount of services public sector unionism involves a different welfare calculus than private sector unionism.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number
1452.
Length: Date of creation: Jun 1986 Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:1452
Note: LS Contact details of provider: Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Phone: 617-868-3900 Email: Web page: http://www.nber.org More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Alberto Chong & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, 2004.
"Privatization in Mexico,"
RES Working Papers
4373, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Alberto Chong & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, 2004.
"Privatización en México,"
RES Working Papers
4374, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
[Downloadable!]
Brams, Steven J. & Kilgour, D. Marc & Weber, Shlomo, 1989.
"Sequential Arbitration Procedures,"
Working Papers
89-13, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: