Heterogeneous Expectations and the Predictive Power of Econometric Models
AbstractA recent literature questions the mainstream omniscient rational agent, suggesting that agents act as, and have the same bounded rationality of, econometricians. Heterogeneous expectations may then arise because of the different forecasting models used by individuals, who select disparate predictors according to the peculiar net benefits of each model. Net benefits are assumed to be a function of mean square forecasting errors (MSE). Consequently, as in Carroll’s epidemiological approach, an implicit assumption is that the level of disagreement across agents cannot Granger cause model-based MSE. Instead, survey expectations on GDP growth show that the information flow runs exclusively from heterogeneity to MSE. Moreover, variance decompositions point out that survey expectations entropy and MSE are not contemporaneously correlated, enforcing the detected causal chain. Results are robust to several predictors, nonlinearities, and suggest looking also at other possible causes of disagreement.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ISTAT - Italian National Institute of Statistics - (Rome, ITALY) in its series ISAE Working Papers with number 125.
Length: 39 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2010
Date of revision:
Survey Expectations; Forecasting Models.;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
- D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations
- E27 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2010-10-23 (All new papers)
- NEP-CBA-2010-10-23 (Central Banking)
- NEP-FOR-2010-10-23 (Forecasting)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Spencer, David E, 1989. "Does Money Matter? The Robustness of Evidence from Vector Autoregressions," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 21(4), pages 442-54, November.
- Roberts, John M., 1997.
"Is inflation sticky?,"
Journal of Monetary Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 173-196, July.
- Roberts, John M, 1995. "New Keynesian Economics and the Phillips Curve," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 27(4), pages 975-84, November.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stefania Rossetti).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.