IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fer/resrep/p53.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Essays on the efficiency of schools and student achievement

Author

Listed:
  • Kirjavainen, Tanja

Abstract

This thesis consists of five essays that investigate the efficiency differences of schools, explain the differences in efficiency and student achievement and take a further step by looking inside schools with differing efficiency. In the studies presented in the essays, efficiency differences were estimated with various methods, both parametric and non-parametric, and at different points in time using both cross section and panel data. The use of panel data, in particular, brings new possibilities to the analysis and understanding of efficiency differences. The stability of the efficiency estimations was also tested with several models. Information on this matter is a prerequisite if efficiency differences are to be studied further. The causes of inefficiency were examined in this thesis with both quantitative and qualitative methods. The use of both of these methods broadened the scope of earlier studies and provided useful information on their advantages and disadvantages in analysing causes of efficiency. The application of different approaches also provided a richer description and understanding of the case schools, their processes and factors affecting efficiency. Finnish general upper secondary schools provided a good empirical context to analyse efficiency differences between schools and factors affecting student achievement, because the schooling is fairly short, lasting on average for three years, information is available on the earlier school achievement of the students as well as their family background, and most importantly, it concludes with a nation-wide matriculation examination. The empirical analyses in this thesis are based on register data on Finnish general upper secondary schools, their students and students' parents in 1991, 1990-1998 and 2000-2004. The register data are supplemented with survey data from 73 schools in 1995 and 27 semi-structured interviews of principals and teachers in 9 schools in 1999. The results of the studies show that there were efficiency differences between Finnish general upper secondary schools. The size of the differences depended on the method and model used for calculating the efficiency. The rankings of schools based on efficiency scores were also fairly unstable. Concerning organizational practices, very few of them were related to efficiency. The results of case studies showed that schools with caring views about the students, professional staff relations, participative management and decision making, and curriculum work which was perceived as a way to develop school and own work were more efficient. In addition to investigating efficiency differences, the studies in this thesis examined the influence of the comprehensive school grade point average, family background, school resources, length of studies and decentralization of test taking on performance in the matriculation examination with different methods and data and at different points in time. The results provided causal information on the effect of changes in school resources on student achievement and they showed that student achievement was not affected by the changes in resources. New evidence was also provided on the effect of lengthening of studies and decentralization of test taking in the matriculation examination. According to results, schools with longer length of studies and higher rate of decentralization performed worse in the matriculation examination.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirjavainen, Tanja, 2009. "Essays on the efficiency of schools and student achievement," Research Reports P53, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:fer:resrep:p53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.doria.fi/handle/10024/148888
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan B. Krueger, 1999. "Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 114(2), pages 497-532.
    2. Eide, Eric & Showalter, Mark H., 1998. "The effect of school quality on student performance: A quantile regression approach," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 345-350, March.
    3. repec:fth:prinin:366 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. David Card & Alan B. Krueger, 1996. "School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 31-50, Fall.
    5. Caroline M. Hoxby, 1998. "The Effects of Class Size and Composition on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Natural Population Variation," NBER Working Papers 6869, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Kirjavainen, Tanja & Häkkinen, Iida & Uusitalo, Roope, 2000. "School Resources and Student Achievement Revisited: New Evidence Using Panel Data," Discussion Papers 227, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    7. Hanushek, Eric A, 1986. "The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 24(3), pages 1141-1177, September.
    8. David Card & Alan Krueger, 1996. "School Resources and Student Outcomes: An Overview of the Literature and New Evidence from North and South Carolina," Working Papers 745, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    9. Joshua D. Angrist & Victor Lavy, 1999. "Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Scholastic Achievement," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(2), pages 533-575.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kalervo Friberg, 2013. "An Educational–Vocational Intervention," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, July.
    2. Kässi, Otto, 2012. "Uncertainty and Heterogeneity in Returns to Education: Evidence from Finland," MPRA Paper 48738, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Aug 2013.
    3. Moisio, Antti, 2012. "Rethinking local government: Essays on municipal reform," Research Reports P61, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    4. K. Kounetas & G. Androulakis & M. Kaisari & G. Manousakis, 2023. "Educational reforms and secondary school's efficiency performance in Greece: a bootstrap DEA and multilevel approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-29, March.
    5. Kalervo Friberg, 2020. "Efficacy of Work–Life Orientation: Region and Parents’ Education as Background Factors," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    6. Heikki Pursiainen & Mika Kortelainen & Jenni Pääkkönen, 2014. "Impact of School Quality on Educational Attainment - Evidence from Finnish High Schools," ERSA conference papers ersa14p711, European Regional Science Association.
    7. Tanja Kirjavainen, 2012. "Efficiency of Finnish general upper secondary schools: an application of stochastic frontier analysis with panel data," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 343-364, April.
    8. Kalervo Friberg, 2013. "Loci of Causality and Orientation in Occupational and Educational Choices," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, June.
    9. Korkeamäki, Ossi, 2012. "Essays on labour demand and wage formation," Research Reports P60, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Moisio, Antti, 2010. "Local public sector in transition: A Nordic perspective," Research Reports P56, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Tuomo Suhonen & Jaakko Pehkonen & Hannu Tervo, 2011. "Spatial variation in the development of the return to university education in Finland, 1970-2004," ERSA conference papers ersa10p1351, European Regional Science Association.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirjavainen, Tanja, 2009. "Essays on the efficiency of schools and student achievement," Research Reports 53, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Hakkinen, Iida & Kirjavainen, Tanja & Uusitalo, Roope, 2003. "School resources and student achievement revisited: new evidence from panel data," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 329-335, June.
    3. Ludger Wößmann, 2003. "European education production functions: what makes a difference for student achievement in Europe?," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 190, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    4. Jonathan Guryan, 2004. "Desegregation and Black Dropout Rates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 94(4), pages 919-943, September.
    5. Giacomo De Giorgi & Michele Pellizzari & William Gui Woolston, 2012. "Class Size And Class Heterogeneity," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 795-830, August.
    6. Dustmann, Christian & Ku, Hyejin & Kwak, Do Won, 2018. "Why Are Single-Sex Schools Successful?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 79-99.
    7. Muharrem Yeşilırmak, 2018. "Decreasing average cost in private schools, existence of majority voting equilibrium, and a policy analysis for Turkey," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 22(1), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Jackson, Erika & Page, Marianne E., 2013. "Estimating the distributional effects of education reforms: A look at Project STAR," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 92-103.
    9. Cristian Barra & Marinella Boccia, 2022. "What matters in educational performance? Evidence from OECD and non-OECD countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 4335-4394, December.
    10. Eskil Heinesen & Brian Krogh Graversen, 2005. "The effect of school resources on educational attainment: evidence from Denmark," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 109-143, April.
    11. Ma, Lingjie & Koenker, Roger, 2006. "Quantile regression methods for recursive structural equation models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 471-506, October.
    12. Corak, Miles & Lauzon, Darren, 2009. "Differences in the distribution of high school achievement: The role of class-size and time-in-term," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 189-198, April.
    13. Gilpin, Gregory A., 2012. "Teacher salaries and teacher aptitude: An analysis using quantile regressions," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 15-29.
    14. repec:pri:cepsud:180rothstein is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Fertig, Michael, 2003. "Educational Production, Endogenous Peer Group Formation and Class Composition – Evidence from the PISA 2000 Study," IZA Discussion Papers 714, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. West, Martin R. & Woessmann, Ludger, 2006. "Which school systems sort weaker students into smaller classes? International evidence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 944-968, December.
    17. Argaw, Bethlehem A. & Puhani, Patrick A., 2018. "Does class size matter for school tracking outcomes after elementary school? Quasi-experimental evidence using administrative panel data from Germany," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-57.
    18. Gary-Bobo, Robert J. & Mahjoub, Mohamed Badrane, 2006. "Estimation of Class-Size Effects, Using 'Maimonides' Rule': The Case of French Junior High Schools," CEPR Discussion Papers 5754, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Joshua D. Angrist & Victor Lavy, 1997. "Using Maimonides' Rule to Estimate the Effect of Class Size on Student Achievement," NBER Working Papers 5888, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Stephanie Riegg Cellini & Fernando Ferreira & Jesse Rothstein, 2008. "The Value of School Facilities: Evidence from a Dynamic Regression Discontinuity Design," NBER Working Papers 14516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    21. Paco Martorel & Kevin Stange & Isaac McFarlin Jr., 2016. "Investing in Schools: Capital Spending, Facility Conditions, and Student Achievement (Revised and Edited)," Upjohn Working Papers 16-256, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fer:resrep:p53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Niskanen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vatttfi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.