What is the cost of retaining and attracting exceptional talents? Evidence from the Canada Research Chair program
AbstractThe compensation of a professor who is awarded an internal Canada Research Chair (CRC) increases by 6.3 percent on average in our sample. This gain is large initially but quickly erodes over CRC tenure. The gain is slightly larger for professors who change university to obtain a CRC Chair. Assuming that the CRC program has achieved its goal of attracting and retaining top talents, we infer that the compensation cost of doing so is modest. In addition, only a small fraction of the CRC grants have been passed through to professors as compensation increases. This is despite the fact that universities report spending more than half of the CRC grants on chairholder compensation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers in its series CEPR Discussion Papers with number 8966.
Date of creation: May 2012
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 77 Bastwick Street, London EC1V 3PZ
Phone: 44 - 20 - 7183 8801
Fax: 44 - 20 - 7183 8820
Other versions of this item:
- Pascal Courty & John Sim, 2012. "What is the cost of retaining and attracting exceptional talents? Evidence from the Canada Research Chair program," Working Papers 1294, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
- I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education and Research Institutions
- J3 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Gibson, John & McKenzie, David, 2011.
"Eight questions about brain drain,"
Policy Research Working Paper Series
5668, The World Bank.
- John Gibson & David McKenzie, 2011. "Eight Questions about Brain Drain," CReAM Discussion Paper Series 1111, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration (CReAM), Department of Economics, University College London.
- Gibson, John & McKenzie, David, 2011. "Eight Questions about Brain Drain," IZA Discussion Papers 5730, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- Catherine HAECK & Frank VERBOVEN, 2010.
"The internal economics of a university - evidence from personnel data,"
Center for Economic Studies - Discussion papers
ces10.18, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
- Catherine Haeck & Frank Verboven, 2012. "The Internal Economics of a University: Evidence from Personnel Data," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 591 - 626.
- Haeck, Catherine & Verboven, Frank, 2010. "The internal economics of a university - evidence from personnel data," Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/267474, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
- Haeck, Catherine & Verboven, Frank, 2010. "The Internal Economics of a University - Evidence from Personnel Data," CEPR Discussion Papers 7843, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ehrenberg, R.G.Ronald G., 2004. "Econometric studies of higher education," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1-2), pages 19-37.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.