Using contracts to mitigate salinity: an analysis of voluntary cost-sharing agreements
AbstractThis paper looks at the incentives of voluntary cost-sharing agreements being used by the Department of Conservation and Land Management (CALM) in three natural diversity recovery catchments in the South West of Western Australia. These agreements represent an understanding between CALM and the farmer to undertake salinity mitigating works according to guidelines. CALM’s objectives are to preserve and enhance target natural diversity assets through conservation and sustainable land use systems. These agreements are tailored to farmers according to the private and public benefits expected as a result of the works. Catchment management officers can respond to farmers needs and account for the importance of the works to the conservation of the natural diversity asset but are constrained by equity and efficiency considerations. Cost-sharing agreements can be analysed using a principal-agent framework and the theory of contracts. A theoretical model is used to determine the optimal amount of abatement undertaken by farmers in the recovery catchments, where abatement is measured as the area revegetated as a proxy for recharge reduction. This model is used to evaluate current approaches to contracting in the light of CALM’s objectives. Results show that an equity constraint which pays the same transfer payment for the same area of land revegetated will result in lower total of abatement, higher total transfer payments, and lower social welfare in the form of value of abatement to the environmental regulator. These results support the approach taken by CALM to negotiate VCSA on a basis of private and public benefits rather than a standard VCSA for area abated.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society in its series 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia with number 137926.
Date of creation: 2005
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: AARES Central Office Manager, Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU, Canberra ACT 0200
Phone: 0409 032 338
Web page: http://www.aares.info/
More information through EDIRC
dryland salinity; contracts; cost-sharing agreements; incentives; equity; Environmental Economics and Policy; Land Economics/Use;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Brousseau, Eric & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2002. "The economics of contracts: Theories and applications," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/12331, Paris Dauphine University.
- Parkhurst, Gregory M. & Shogren, Jason F. & Bastian, Chris & Kivi, Paul & Donner, Jennifer & Smith, Rodney B. W., 2002. "Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 305-328, May.
- Bystrom, Olof & Bromley, Daniel W., 1998. "Contracting For Nonpoint-Source Pollution Abatement," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(01), July.
- Krawczyk, Jacek B. & Lifran, Robert & Tidball, Mabel, 2005. "Use of coupled incentives to improve adoption of environmentally friendly technologies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 311-329, March.
- Andrew Moxey & Ben White & Adam Ozanne, 1999. "Efficient Contract Design for Agri-Environment Policy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(2), pages 187-202.
- Bourgeon, Jean-Marc & Jayet, Pierre-Alain & Picard, Pierre, 1995. "An incentive approach to land set-aside programs," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1487-1509, October.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.