IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rvmgts/v15y2021i5d10.1007_s11846-020-00391-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Eytam

    (Shamoon College of Engineering)

  • Oded Lowengart

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

  • Noam Tractinsky

    (Ben-Gurion University of the Negev)

Abstract

Simplicity is often advocated as a key design factor in interactive products. It has been suggested that the simplicity (or complexity) of a product’s design influences consumers’ decision-making processes, potentially increasing or decreasing product value. However, the paradox of simplicity (Eytam et al. in Int J Hum–Comput Stud 105: 43–55, 2017) suggests that some moderating factors affect the relation between design simplicity and consumer preferences. The objective of this study was to test whether this paradox of simplicity in interactive products could be explained by considering the moderating role of individual differences in perceptions of the visual simplicity of a product’s user interface. We conducted an experiment to test this proposition, grouping users according to the following individual differences: personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology, internal computer self-efficacy, social comparison orientation, maximization, and centrality of visual product aesthetics. Our findings indicate that personal characteristics influence the perception of a design’s level of visual simplicity. This, in turn, influences instrumental (i.e., ease-of-use and functionality) and aesthetic product attribute judgments, and consumer preference. The results shed light on how product design is used to assess the quality of interactive products.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Eytam & Oded Lowengart & Noam Tractinsky, 2021. "Effects of visual simplicity in product design and individual differences in preference of interactive products," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(5), pages 1347-1389, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00391-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11846-020-00391-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ritu Agarwal & Jayesh Prasad, 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 204-215, June.
    2. Daniel McFadden, 2001. "Economic Choices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(3), pages 351-378, June.
    3. Bassam Hasan, 2007. "Examining the Effects of Computer Self-Efficacy and System Complexity on Technology Acceptance," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 20(3), pages 76-88, July.
    4. Wu, Kewen & Vassileva, Julita & Zhao, Yuxiang & Noorian, Zeinab & Waldner, Wesley & Adaji, Ifeoma, 2016. "Complexity or simplicity? Designing product pictures for advertising in online marketplaces," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 17-27.
    5. Daniel McFadden, 1986. "The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 275-297.
    6. Rajagopal, 2014. "The Human Factors," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Architecting Enterprise, chapter 9, pages 225-249, Palgrave Macmillan.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:2:y:2007:i::p:342-350 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:3:y:2008:i::p:371-388 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. McFadden, Daniel, 1974. "The measurement of urban travel demand," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 303-328, November.
    10. Bloch, Peter H & Brunel, Frederic F & Arnold, Todd J, 2003. "Individual Differences in the Centrality of Visual Product Aesthetics: Concept and Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 551-565, March.
    11. Ritu Agarwal & V. Sambamurthy & Ralph M. Stair, 2000. "Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy—An Empirical Assessment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 418-430, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    2. Patricia Baudier & Galina Kondrateva & Chantal Ammi, 2020. "The future of Telemedicine Cabin? The case of the French students’ acceptability," Post-Print hal-02928918, HAL.
    3. Daniel McFadden, 2014. "The new science of pleasure: consumer choice behavior and the measurement of well-being," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 2, pages 7-48, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Teratanavat, Ratapol P. & Hooker, Neal H., 2005. "Exploring Consumer Valuation and Preference Heterogeneity for Functional Foods Using a Choice Experiment: A Case Study of Tomato Juice Containing Soy in Ohio," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19556, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Ae-Ri Lee, 2021. "Investigating the Personalization–Privacy Paradox in Internet of Things (IoT) Based on Dual-Factor Theory: Moderating Effects of Type of IoT Service and User Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-27, September.
    6. Ricardo Daziano & Denis Bolduc, 2013. "Covariance, identification, and finite-sample performance of the MSL and Bayes estimators of a logit model with latent attributes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 647-670, May.
    7. Li, Menglin & Jin, Yufang & Zhang, Jurui & Liu, Raymond, 2022. "Does shape in backgrounds matter? Effects of Shape–Taste congruence on product evaluations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    8. Samir Ghazouani & Mohamed Goaïed, 1993. "Analyse micro-économétrique de la demande de transport urbain pour la ville de Tunis," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 108(2), pages 47-62.
    9. Defeuilley, Christophe, 2009. "Retail competition in electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 377-386, February.
    10. Pablo M Garcia, 2005. "Una Aproximación Microeconométrica a los Determinantes de la Elección del Modo de Transporte. (A Microeconometric Approach to the Determinants of Travel Mode Choice)," Urban/Regional 0504005, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Akaichi, Faical & Costa-Font, Joan & Frank, Richard, 2020. "Uninsured by Choice? A choice experiment on long term care insurance," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 422-434.
    12. Chou, Shih-Wei & Hsu, Chia-Shiang, 2018. "An empirical investigation on knowledge use in virtual communities–A relationship development perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 243-255.
    13. Manzini, Paola & Mariotti, Marco, 2010. "Moody choice," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-15, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    14. Sigurdsson, Valdimar & Larsen, Nils Magne & Alemu, Mohammed Hussen & Gallogly, Joseph Karlton & Menon, R. G. Vishnu & Fagerstrøm, Asle, 2020. "Assisting sustainable food consumption: The effects of quality signals stemming from consumers and stores in online and physical grocery retailing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 458-471.
    15. Robert Kapłon, 2006. "A retrospective review of categorical data analysis – theory and marketing practice," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 16(1), pages 55-72.
    16. Leroy Robinson, 2017. "Embracing online education: exploring options for success," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 99-111, January.
    17. Jonas De Vos & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Tim Schwanen & Veronique Van Acker & Frank Witlox, 2016. "Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 771-796, September.
    18. Pascal Bouyaux, 1989. "Une difficulté d'interprétation de l'approche Logit : l'exemple de l'économie des transports," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 91(5), pages 119-131.
    19. Nienhueser, Ian Andrew & Qiu, Yueming, 2016. "Economic and environmental impacts of providing renewable energy for electric vehicle charging – A choice experiment study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 256-268.
    20. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Gwangjae Yu, 2020. "Product Design Under Multinomial Logit Choices: Optimization of Quality and Prices in an Evolving Product Line," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1011-1025, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:15:y:2021:i:5:d:10.1007_s11846-020-00391-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.