IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v32y2022i3d10.1007_s12525-022-00539-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India

Author

Listed:
  • Aashish Argade

    (Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA))

  • Arnab Kumar Laha

    (Indian Institute of Management)

  • Anand Kumar Jaiswal

    (Indian Institute of Management)

Abstract

Benefits of electronic marketplaces across diverse, largely consumer-facing, competitive industries have been in the form of lower transaction costs, transparent price discovery, and improved coordination. This article explores the benefits of electronic marketplaces under oligopsony, which generally encompasses relational marketing as well. With producer – first handler agricultural markets as the context, the article draws from literature on electronic marketplaces, transaction costs, and seller-buyer dependence. Based on survey data, an exploratory factor analysis is conducted to understand the elements of relational marketing between farmers and traders. Subsequently, transaction costs of marketing in a physical agricultural marketplace are compared with those in its electronic counterpart. Results did not indicate significant reduction in transaction costs in the e-marketplaces. Reasons for such findings are logically deduced to be a consequence of opportunistic traders not sharing marketing-related information with farmers, notwithstanding dependence of the latter on traders for such informational needs. Implications for policymakers, third-party electronic marketplace providers are discussed for the specific context, besides indicators for similar other market structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Aashish Argade & Arnab Kumar Laha & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2022. "Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1541-1554, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00539-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-022-00539-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-022-00539-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-022-00539-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Freebairn, 2001. "Some Market Effects Of E-Commerce," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 46(01), pages 49-62.
    2. Jason Henderson & Frank Dooley & Jay Akridge, 2004. "Internet and E-Commerce Adoption by Agricultural Input Firms," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 26(4), pages 505-520.
    3. Sinha, Rajesh Kumar & Kumar, Ranjit, 2010. "Innovative Technologies, Institutions and Policies for Successful Value Chains for Tur Farmers: A Case Study of NCDEX Spot," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 23(Conferenc), November.
    4. Marcel Fafchamps & Bart Minten, 1999. "Relationships and traders in Madagascar," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 1-35.
    5. Jill E. Hobbs, 1997. "Measuring the Importance of Transaction Costs in Cattle Marketing," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(4), pages 1083-1095.
    6. Richard T. Rogers & Richard J. Sexton, 1994. "Assessing the Importance of Oligopsony Power in Agricultural Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1143-1150.
    7. Leroux, Nicole & Wortman, Max S., Jr. & Mathias, Eric D., 2001. "Dominant Factors Impacting The Development Of Business-To-Business (B2b) E-Commerce In Agriculture," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14.
    8. Robert F. Lanzillotti, 1960. "The Superior Market Power of Food Processing and Agricultural Supply Firms—Its Relation to the Farm Problem," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 42(5), pages 1228-1247.
    9. Negi, Digvijay S. & Birthal, Pratap S. & Roy, Devesh & Khan, Md. Tajuddin, 2018. "Farmers’ choice of market channels and producer prices in India: Role of transportation and communication networks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 106-121.
    10. Luis Garicano & Steven N. Kaplan, 2001. "The Effects of Business-to-Business E-Commerce on Transaction Costs," NBER Chapters, in: E-commerce, pages 463-485, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Acharya, S.S., 1998. "Agricultural Marketing in India: Some Facts and Emerging Issues," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 53(3), September.
    12. Manouselis, Nikos & Konstantas, A. & Palavitsinis, N. & Costopoulou, Constantina & Sideridis, Alexander B., 2009. "A Survey of Greek Agricultural E-Markets," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16.
    13. Catherine A. Durham & Richard J. Sexton, 1992. "Oligopsony Potential in Agriculture: Residual Supply Estimation in California's Processing Tomato Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(4), pages 962-972.
    14. Flett, Ross & Alpass, Fiona & Humphries, Steve & Massey, Claire & Morriss, Stuart & Long, Nigel, 2004. "The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 199-211, May.
    15. Geyskens, I. & Steenkamp, J.E.B.M. & Scheer, L.K. & Kumar, N., 1996. "The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment : A trans-Atlantic study," Other publications TiSEM ef7c8d6c-963d-4ee7-8576-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Zapata, Samuel D. & Isengildina-Massa, Olga & Carpio, Carlos E. & Lamie, R. David, 2016. "Does E-Commerce Help Farmers’ Markets? Measuring the Impact of MarketMaker," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(2), pages 1-18, July.
    17. Arjunan Subramanian & Matin Qaim, 2011. "Interlocked Village Markets and Trader Idiosyncrasy in Rural India," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 690-709, September.
    18. Fergus Lyon & Gina Porter, 2009. "Market institutions, trust and norms: exploring moral economies in Nigerian food systems," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 33(5), pages 903-920, September.
    19. Kareem Abdul, Waheed & Gaur, Sanjaya S. & Peñaloza, Lisa N., 2012. "The determinants of customer trust in buyer–seller relationships: An empirical investigation in rural India," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 303-313.
    20. Barry K. Goodwin, 1994. "Oligopsony Power: A Forgotten Dimension of Food Marketing? Discussion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(5), pages 1163-1165.
    21. Verma, Pranay & Sinha, Neena, 2018. "Integrating perceived economic wellbeing to technology acceptance model: The case of mobile based agricultural extension service," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 207-216.
    22. J. Yannis Bakos, 1997. "Reducing Buyer Search Costs: Implications for Electronic Marketplaces," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1676-1692, December.
    23. Thomas L. Sporleder, 1984. "Implications of Electronic Trading for the Structure of Agricultural Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 859-863.
    24. Andreu, Luisa & Aldás, Joaquín & Bigné, J. Enrique & Mattila, Anna S., 2010. "An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on relational quality in travel agency–supplier relationships," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 777-787.
    25. Andrea Goldstein & David O’Connor, 2000. "E-Commerce for Development: Prospects and Policy Issues," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 164, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Alt, 2022. "Electronic Markets on platform culture," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1019-1031, September.
    2. Neeraj Singh & Kushankur Dey, 2023. "A typology of agricultural market information systems and its dimensions: Case studies of digital platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Argade Aashish & Laha, A. K., 2018. "E-commerce in oligopsonistic and relational markets – An empirical investigation of transaction costs in agricultural e-markets in India from farmers’ perspective," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-06-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    2. Ronchi, Loraine, 2006. "Fairtrade and market failures in agricultural commodity markets," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4011, The World Bank.
    3. Sexton, Richard J., 1990. "The Role of Cooperatives in Increasingly Concentrated Agricultural Markets," Cooperatives: Their Importance in the Future Food and Agricultural System - FAMC 1990 Conference 265909, Food and Agricultural Marketing Consortium (FAMC).
    4. Eric Overby & Sandy Jap, 2009. "Electronic and Physical Market Channels: A Multiyear Investigation in a Market for Products of Uncertain Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 940-957, June.
    5. E. C. Pasour, Jr., 2004. "Agricultural Economists and the State," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 1(1), pages 106-133, April.
    6. Fecke, Wilm & Danne, Michael & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2018. "E-commerce in agriculture: The case of crop protection product purchases in a discrete choice experiment," DARE Discussion Papers 1803, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (DARE).
    7. Andreas I. Nicolaou, 2011. "Supply of data assurance in electronic exchanges and user evaluation of risk and performance outcomes," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 21(2), pages 113-127, June.
    8. Richard, James E. & Purnell, Fruen, 2017. "Rethinking Catalogue and Online B2B Buyer Channel Preferences in the Education Supplies Market," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Ruhangawebare, Godfrey Kalemera, 2010. "Factors Affecting The Level Of Commercialization Among Cattle Keepers In The Pastoral Areas Of Uganda," Research Theses 117797, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    10. Hervani, Aref A., 2005. "Can oligopsony power be measured? The case of U.S. old newspapers market," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 343-380.
    11. Shan Wang & Shi Zheng & Lida Xu & Dezheng Li & Huan Meng, 2008. "A literature review of electronic marketplace research: Themes, theories and an integrative framework," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(5), pages 555-571, November.
    12. Ayako Ebata, 2022. "Social embeddedness of pig value chains in Myanmar and its implications for food and nutrition security," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(4), pages 965-976, August.
    13. Kuijpers, Rob, 2020. "Integrated Value Chain Development: Evidence from Bangladesh," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Xiaojing Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Xianli Xia & Waqar Hussain Memon, 2021. "Village Environment, Capital Endowment, and Farmers’ Participation in E-Commerce Sales Behavior: A Demand Observable Bivariate Probit Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Zeng, Yiwu & Jia, Fu & Wan, Li & Guo, Hongdong, 2017. "E-commerce in agri-food sector: a systematic literature review," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), February.
    16. Mujawamariya, Gaudiose & Burger, Kees & D'Haese, Marijke F.C., 2012. "Behaviour and performance of traders in the gum arabic supply chain in Senegal: Investigating oligopsonistic myths," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126236, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Scott, Stephanie & Hughes, Paul & Hodgkinson, Ian & Kraus, Sascha, 2019. "Technology adoption factors in the digitization of popular culture: Analyzing the online gambling market," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    18. Kherallah, Mylène & Kirsten, Johann, 2001. "The new institutional economics," MSSD discussion papers 41, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    19. Franken, Jason R.V. & Pennings, Joost M.E., 2005. "Changing Agricultural Marketing Channel Structures: Interdependences & Risk Preferences," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19414, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Dushnitsky, Gary & Klueter, Thomas, 2017. "Which industries are served by online marketplaces for technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 651-666.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electronic marketplaces; Oligopsony; Agricultural marketplaces; Developing countries; Relational markets;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • H80 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - General
    • Q02 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Commodity Market

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00539-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.