IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/elmark/v32y2022i2d10.1007_s12525-022-00529-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models

Author

Listed:
  • Ruben Tessmann

    (Technical University of Darmstadt)

  • Ralf Elbert

    (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Abstract

Our knowledge on differences in business model characteristics of thriving and failing Multi-Sided Platforms in competitive B2B networks (B2B-MSP) and potential influences of increasing governmental involvement remains fragmented. This study develops a taxonomy to classify special B2B-MSP with varying governmental influence in the supply chain and transportation context, viz. Port and Cargo Community Systems (CS). Based on the classification of 44 international CS, we identify four archetypes using cluster analysis. The taxonomy provides practitioners with a differentiated view on the configuration options of CS business models including the involvement of governmental institutions, while the presented archetypes contribute an aggregated view of CS business models. The statistical analysis of our results provides initial explanatory approaches on CS business model dimension interdependencies, thereby laying the basis for a deeper understanding of sectoral and geographic differences of B2B-MSP and their diffusion dynamics as well as facilitating a higher contextualization of future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "Multi-sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 829-872, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00529-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s12525-022-00529-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12525-022-00529-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12525-022-00529-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    2. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.
    3. Olanrewaju Akande & Fan Li & Jerome Reiter, 2017. "An Empirical Comparison of Multiple Imputation Methods for Categorical Data," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(2), pages 162-170, April.
    4. Erik-Hans Klijn & Geert R. Teisman, 2003. "Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public—Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, July.
    5. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 179-201, September.
    6. Frank Riemensperger & Svenja Falk, 2020. "How to capture the B2B platform opportunity," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(1), pages 61-63, March.
    7. Zdeněk Šulc & Hana Řezanková, 2019. "Comparison of Similarity Measures for Categorical Data in Hierarchical Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(1), pages 58-72, April.
    8. Hagiu, Andrei & Wright, Julian, 2015. "Multi-sided platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 162-174.
    9. Martijn R. van der Horst & Larissa M. van der Lugt, 2014. "An Institutional Analysis of Coordination in Liberalized Port-related Railway Chains: An Application to the Port of Rotterdam," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 68-85, January.
    10. Jan Abendroth & Lara Riefle & Carina Benz, 2021. "Opening the Black Box of Digital B2B Co-creation Platforms: A Taxonomy," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Frederik Ahlemann & Reinhard Schütte & Stefan Stieglitz (ed.), Innovation Through Information Systems, pages 596-611, Springer.
    11. Daniel Szopinski & Thorsten Schoormann & Thomas John & Ralf Knackstedt & Dennis Kundisch, 2020. "Software tools for business model innovation: current state and future challenges," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 469-494, September.
    12. van Baalen, Peter & Zuidwijk, Rob & van Nunen, Jo, 2009. "Port Inter-Organizational Information Systems: Capabilities to Service Global Supply Chains," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 2(2-3), pages 81-241, October.
    13. Michele Simoni & Francesco Schiavone & Marcello Risitano & Daniele Leone & Junsong Chen, 2022. "Group-specific business process improvements via a Port Community System : The case of Rotterdam," Post-Print hal-03188228, HAL.
    14. Tae-Woo Lee & Nam-Kyu Park & John F. Joint & Woong Gyu Kim, 2000. "A new efficient EDI system for container cargo logistics," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 133-144, April.
    15. Halevi, Gali & Moed, Henk & Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2017. "Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the Literature," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 823-834.
    16. Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Rezapour, Shabnam & Drezner, Tammy & Fallah, Samira, 2014. "Competitive supply chain network design: An overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 92-118.
    17. Nadia Hafsi, 2017. "PortNet in Morocco," World Bank Publications - Reports 26294, The World Bank Group.
    18. Martijn R. van der Horst & Larissa M. van der Lugt, 2011. "Coordination mechanisms in improving hinterland accessibility: empirical analysis in the port of Rotterdam," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 415-435, March.
    19. Michael Gusenbauer, 2019. "Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(1), pages 177-214, January.
    20. Arduino, Giulia & Aronietis, Raimonds & Crozet, Yves & Frouws, Koos & Ferrari, Claudio & Guihéry, Laurent & Kapros, Seraphim & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Laroche, Florent & Lambrou, Maria & Lloyd, Michael , 2013. "How to turn an innovative concept into a success? An application to seaport-related innovation," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 97-107.
    21. Jens Passlick & Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Lukas Grützner & Dennis Eilers & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 67-87, March.
    22. Patrick Loux & Mathilde Aubry & Sébastien Tran & Emmanuel Baudoin, 2020. "Multi-sided platforms in B2B contexts : the role of affiliation costs and interdependencies in adoption decisions," Post-Print hal-02376313, HAL.
    23. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    24. John B. Carlin & Ning Li & Philip Greenwood & Carolyn Coffey, 2003. "Tools for analyzing multiple imputed datasets," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 3(3), pages 226-244, September.
    25. Christian F. Durach & Joakim Kembro & Andreas Wieland, 2017. "A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 53(4), pages 67-85, October.
    26. Elbert, R. & Tessmann, R., 2021. "Port Community Systems – Supply Chain App stores of the future?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 125319, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    27. Peter W. de Langen & Christiaan Heij, 2014. "Corporatisation and Performance: A Literature Review and an Analysis of the Performance Effects of the Corporatisation of Port of Rotterdam Authority," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 396-414, May.
    28. Marie-Laure Baron & Hervé Mathieu, 2013. "PCS interoperability in Europe: A market for PCS operators?," Post-Print hal-02180688, HAL.
    29. Alberto Martín-Martín & Mike Thelwall & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2021. "Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 871-906, January.
    30. Henner Gimpel & Daniel Rau & Maximilian Röglinger, 2018. "Understanding FinTech start-ups – a taxonomy of consumer-oriented service offerings," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 245-264, August.
    31. Alberto Martín-Martín & Mike Thelwall & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2021. "Correction to: Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 907-908, January.
    32. P. Taneja & W.E. Walker & H. Ligteringen & M. Van Schuylenburg & R. Van Der Plas, 2010. "Implications of an uncertain future for port planning," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 221-245, May.
    33. Laurent Fedi & Alexandre Lavissière & Dawn Russel & David Swanson, 2019. "The facilitating role of IT systems for legal compliance: the case of Port Community Systems and container Verified Gross Mass (VGM)," Post-Print hal-02062142, HAL.
    34. G. N. Kenyon & M. Goldsmith & B. D. Neureuther & D. Zhou, 2018. "Improving the return on investment in ports: opportunities in data management," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(4), pages 514-530, December.
    35. Wallbach, Sören & Coleman, Katrin & Elbert, Ralf & Benlian, Alexander, 2019. "Multi-sided platform diffusion in competitive B2B networks: Inhibiting factors and their impact on network effects," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 117236, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    36. Sören Wallbach & Katrin Coleman & Ralf Elbert & Alexander Benlian, 2019. "Multi-sided platform diffusion in competitive B2B networks: inhibiting factors and their impact on network effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 693-710, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rainer Alt, 2022. "Electronic Markets on platform transformation," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 401-409, June.
    2. Ahmed Antwi-Boampong & David King Boison & Musah Osumanu Doumbia & Afia Nyarko Boakye & Linda Osei-Fosua & Kwame Owiredu Sarbeng, 2022. "Factors Affecting Port Users’ Behavioral Intentions to Adopt Financial Technology (Fintech) in Ports in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case of Ports in Ghana," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(4), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Saravanan Periyasami & Aravin Prince Periyasamy, 2022. "Metaverse as Future Promising Platform Business Model: Case Study on Fashion Value Chain," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-19, November.
    4. Saravanan Periyasami & Aravin Prince Periyasamy, 2022. "Metaverse as Future Promising Platform Business Model: Case Study on Fashion Value Chain," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tessmann, R. & Elbert, R., 2022. "Multi sided platforms in competitive B2B networks with varying governmental influence – a taxonomy of Port and Cargo Community System business models," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 132320, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    2. Ruben Tessmann & Ralf Elbert, 2022. "A multilevel, multi-mode framework for standardization in digital B2B platform eco-systems in international cargo transportation—A multiple case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1843-1875, December.
    3. Erik Hartigh & Claire C.M. Stolwijk & J. Roland Ortt & L. Matthijs Punter, 2023. "Configurations of digital platforms for manufacturing: An analysis of seven cases according to platform functions and types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Matzner, Martin & Pauli, Tobias & Marx, Emanuel & Anke, Jürgen & Poeppelbuss, Jens & Fielt, Erwin & Gregor, Shirley & Sun, Ruonan & Hydle, Katja Maria & Aas, Tor Helge & Aanestad, Margunn & Gordijn, J, 2021. "Transitioning to Platform-based Services and Business Models in a B2B Environment," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(3), pages 143-162.
    5. Yuki Inoue & Takeshi Takenaka & Takami Kasasaku & Tadafumi Tamegai & Ryohei Arai, 2023. "How to design platform ecosystems by intrapreneurs: Implications from action design research on IoT-based platform," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-26, December.
    6. Mosch, Philipp & Majocco, Philipp & Obermaier, Robert, 2023. "Contrasting value creation strategies of industrial-IoT-platforms – a multiple case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    7. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    8. Veile, Johannes W. & Schmidt, Marie-Christin & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2022. "Toward a new era of cooperation: How industrial digital platforms transform business models in Industry 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 387-405.
    9. Sören Wallbach & Katrin Coleman & Ralf Elbert & Alexander Benlian, 2019. "Multi-sided platform diffusion in competitive B2B networks: inhibiting factors and their impact on network effects," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 693-710, December.
    10. Hou, Hong & Shi, Yongjiang, 2021. "Ecosystem-as-structure and ecosystem-as-coevolution: A constructive examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    11. Roger Clarke, 2022. "Research opportunities in the regulatory aspects of electronic markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 179-200, March.
    12. Moros-Daza, Adriana & Amaya-Mier, René & Paternina-Arboleda, Carlos, 2020. "Port Community Systems: A structured literature review," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 27-46.
    13. Estelle Duparc & Frederik Möller & Ilka Jussen & Maleen Stachon & Sükran Algac & Boris Otto, 2022. "Archetypes of open-source business models," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 727-745, June.
    14. Shree, Deep & Kumar Singh, Rajesh & Paul, Justin & Hao, Andy & Xu, Shichun, 2021. "Digital platforms for business-to-business markets: A systematic review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 354-365.
    15. Fabian Schueler & Dimitri Petrik, 2022. "Objectives of platform research: A co-citation and systematic literature review analysis," Papers 2202.08822, arXiv.org.
    16. Michael Gusenbauer, 2022. "Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(5), pages 2683-2745, May.
    17. Mosterd, Lars & Sobota, Vladimir C.M. & van de Kaa, Geerten & Ding, Aaron Yi & de Reuver, Mark, 2021. "Context dependent trade-offs around platform-to-platform openness: The case of the Internet of Things," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Laurin Arnold & Jan Jöhnk & Florian Vogt & Nils Urbach, 2022. "IIoT platforms’ architectural features – a taxonomy and five prevalent archetypes," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 927-944, June.
    19. Nizar Abdelkafi & Christina Raasch & Angela Roth & R. Srinivasan, 2019. "Multi-sided platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 553-559, December.
    20. Hayrol Azril Mohamed Shaffril & Samsul Farid Samsuddin & Asnarulkhadi Abu Samah, 2021. "The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1319-1346, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Taxonomy; Port Community System; Cargo Community System; Cluster Analysis; Business model; Multi-sided platform;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • L91 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Transportation: General
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:elmark:v:32:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s12525-022-00529-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.