IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/restud/v38y1971i2p133-150..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tâtonnement Process for Public Goods

Author

Listed:
  • J. H. Dreze
  • D. de la Vallee Poussin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. H. Dreze & D. de la Vallee Poussin, 1971. "A Tâtonnement Process for Public Goods," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 38(2), pages 133-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:38:y:1971:i:2:p:133-150.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2307/2296777
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parkash Chander & Henry Tulkens, 2006. "A Core-Theoretic Solution for the Design of Cooperative Agreements on Transfrontier Pollution," Springer Books, in: Parkash Chander & Jacques Drèze & C. Knox Lovell & Jack Mintz (ed.), Public goods, environmental externalities and fiscal competition, chapter 0, pages 176-193, Springer.
    2. Ghosal, Sayantan & Morelli, Massimo, 2004. "Retrading in market games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 151-181, March.
    3. A. H. Barnett, 1981. "Soliciting Accurate Evaluations of Public Goods," Public Finance Review, , vol. 9(2), pages 221-234, April.
    4. Theodore Groves, 1975. "Incentive Compatible Control of Decentralized Organizations," Discussion Papers 166, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    5. Jacques H. Drèze & Charles Figuieres & Jean Hindriks, 2007. "Can Federal Grants Mitigate Social Competition?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 53(4), pages 596-617, December.
    6. Peter J. Hammond & Antonio Villar, 1998. "Efficiency with Non‐Convexities: Extending the “Scandinavian Consensus” Approaches," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 11-32, March.
    7. Ledyard, John O., "undated". "Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research," Working Papers 861, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
    8. Kalai, Ehud & Postlewaite, Andrew & Roberts, John, 1979. "A group incentive compatible mechanism yielding core allocations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 13-22, February.
    9. Blankart, Charles B, 1998. "Was Knut Wicksell a Conservative or a Radical? A Note on an Early Monograph by Knut Wicksell," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 94(3-4), pages 355-365, March.
    10. Theodore Groves & John Ledyard, 1974. "An Incentive Mechanism for Efficient Resource Allocation in General Equilibrium with Public Goods," Discussion Papers 119, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    11. Chao, Hung-po & Peck, Stephen, 2000. "Greenhouse gas abatement: How much? and Who pays?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20, January.
    12. Chander, Parkash & Tulkens, Henry, 2006. "Cooperation, Stability and Self-Enforcement in International Environmental Agreements: A Conceptual Discussion," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 12170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    13. Henry Tulkens, 2002. "On Cooperation in Musgravian Models of Externalities within a Federation," CESifo Working Paper Series 701, CESifo.
    14. Yuriy N. Gavrilets & Irina V. Tarakanova, 2013. "Optimality And Equilibrium In A Single-Product Economic Model With Collective Good (Computer Experiments)," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 9(4), pages 7-20.
    15. Matt Van Essen, 2013. "Making efficient public good decisions using an augmented Ausubel auction," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(1), pages 57-68, May.
    16. Chander, Parkash & Tulkens, Henry, 2006. "Cooperation, Stability and Self-Enforcement in International Environmental Agreements: A Conceptual Discussion," Coalition Theory Network Working Papers 12170, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. M. Germain & Ph.L. Toint, 2000. "An Iterative Process for International Negotiations on Acid Rain in Northern Europe Using a General Convex Formulation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 199-216, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:restud:v:38:y:1971:i:2:p:133-150.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/restud .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.