This paper provides a framework in which suppliers of experience goods may find it in their best interests to provide, and enforce, quality standards. The incentives to form self-regulatory organizations are inversely related to ex-ante monitoring costs of the organization, as well as the number of members. This self-regulatory outcome is compared to statutory price and quality regulation. Without informational asymmetries between market participants and the social planer, self-regulatory outcomes can always be replicated by statutory regulation. Even with asymmetric information, self regulation is socially desirable only if the regulator values firm's profits sufficiently highly. Copyright 1995 by Kluwer Academic Publishers
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Did you know? You can include your works in the database easily by uploading them on the Munich Personal RePEc Archive (MPRA) if you do not have access to an institutional RePEc archive.