IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v50y2016i2p489-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours

Author

Listed:
  • José Holguín-Veras

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Director VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems; Director of the Center for Infrastructure, Transportation, and the Environment, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180)

  • Ning Xu

    (Revenue Management, Virgin America, Burlingame, California 94010)

  • Miguel Jaller

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616)

  • John Mitchell

    (Department of Mathematics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180)

Abstract

This paper introduces a dynamic spatial price equilibrium model that estimates urban freight-related flows for integrated producer-carrier operations that compete in a market where a generic commodity is traded. The model is applicable to cases where suppliers compete in a market by producing a commodity that is delivered to customers by means of delivery tours. The model obtains the patterns of commodity flows, production levels, and delivery tours that maximize economic welfare. The model is then reinterpreted as a Nash equilibrium model, where a set of suppliers deploys strategies involving production and delivery decisions to maximize profits, that is then solved with a heuristic approach that decomposes the interrelated decisions into how much to produce, how best to deliver to customers, and how much to charge for the cargo. Once the suppliers make these decisions, a market-clearing mechanism determines the amount of supplies that the various consumer nodes purchase from the suppliers. At this stage, the suppliers readjust their market strategies in anticipation of the next time period. The process ends when equilibrium is reached. Three different dynamics of the suppliers’ decisions on production levels are tested to gain insight into how efficiently each helps to reach the equilibrium solutions. By developing a model that explicitly considers delivery tours, the paper makes a significant contribution to the fields of spatial price equilibrium and freight demand modeling.

Suggested Citation

  • José Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Miguel Jaller & John Mitchell, 2016. "A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 489-519, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:489-519
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2015.0616
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2015.0616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jose Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Gerard Jong & Hedi Maurer, 2011. "An Experimental Economics Investigation of Shipper-carrier Interactions in the Choice of Mode and Shipment Size in Freight Transport," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 509-532, September.
    2. Roorda, Matthew J. & Cavalcante, Rinaldo & McCabe, Stephanie & Kwan, Helen, 2010. "A conceptual framework for agent-based modelling of logistics services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 18-31, January.
    3. David Batten & Börje Johansson, 1985. "Price Adjustments And Multiregional Rigidities In The Analysis Of World Trade," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 145-166, January.
    4. Davis, Douglas D. & Holt, Charles a., 1993. "Experimental economics: Methods, problems and promise," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 8(2), pages 179-212.
    5. Hunt, J.D. & Stefan, K.J., 2007. "Tour-based microsimulation of urban commercial movements," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 981-1013, November.
    6. Timothy Dunne & Mark J. Roberts & Larry Samuelson, 1988. "Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 19(4), pages 495-515, Winter.
    7. Terry L. Friesz & Joel A. Gottfried & Edward K. Morlok, 1986. "A Sequential Shipper-Carrier Network Model for Predicting Freight Flows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 80-91, May.
    8. Liew, Chong K. & Shim, Jae K., 1978. "A spatial equilibrium model: Another view," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 526-534, October.
    9. Friesz, Terry L. & Rigdon, Matthew A. & Mookherjee, Reetabrata, 2006. "Differential variational inequalities and shipper dynamic oligopolistic network competition," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 480-503, July.
    10. Friedman,Daniel & Sunder,Shyam, 1994. "Experimental Methods," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521456821.
    11. Yamada, Tadashi & Imai, Koji & Nakamura, Takamasa & Taniguchi, Eiichi, 2011. "A supply chain-transport supernetwork equilibrium model with the behaviour of freight carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 887-907.
    12. Haghani, Ali & Oh, Sei-Chang, 1996. "Formulation and solution of a multi-commodity, multi-modal network flow model for disaster relief operations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 231-250, May.
    13. Christian Ambrosini & Jean-Louis Routhier, 2004. "Objectives, Methods and Results of Surveys Carried out in the Field of Urban Freight Transport: An International Comparison," Post-Print halshs-00068527, HAL.
    14. Stella Dafermos & Anna Nagurney, 1984. "Sensitivity Analysis for the General Spatial Economic Equilibrium Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 1069-1086, October.
    15. J-F Cordeau & M Gendreau & G Laporte & J-Y Potvin & F Semet, 2002. "A guide to vehicle routing heuristics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(5), pages 512-522, May.
    16. Billy E. Gillett & Leland R. Miller, 1974. "A Heuristic Algorithm for the Vehicle-Dispatch Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 340-349, April.
    17. David Hensher & Sean Puckett, 2005. "Refocusing the Modelling of Freight Distribution: Development of an Economic-Based Framework to Evaluate Supply Chain Behaviour in Response to Congestion Charging," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 573-602, November.
    18. Walter C. Labys & Chin W. Yang, 1997. "Spatial Price Equilibrium As A Foundation To Unified Spatial Commodity Modeling," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 199-228, April.
    19. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    20. van Duin, J.H.R. & Tavasszy, L.A. & Taniguchi, E., 2007. "Real time simulation of auctioning and re-scheduling processes in hybrid freight markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1050-1066, November.
    21. Roy, John R, 1990. "A Dispersed Equilibrium Commodity Trade Model," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 13-28.
    22. José Holguín-Veras & Gopal Patil, 2008. "A Multicommodity Integrated Freight Origin–destination Synthesis Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 309-326, September.
    23. Ham, Heejoo & Kim, Tschangho John & Boyce, David, 2005. "Implementation and estimation of a combined model of interregional, multimodal commodity shipments and transportation network flows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 65-79, January.
    24. Smith, Vernon L, 1976. "Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 66(2), pages 274-279, May.
    25. Garrido, Rodrigo A. & Mahmassani, Hani S., 2000. "Forecasting freight transportation demand with the space-time multinomial probit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 403-418, June.
    26. Inaba, Fred S & Wallace, Nancy E, 1989. "Spatial Price Competition and the Demand for Freight Transportation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(4), pages 614-625, November.
    27. Vernon L. Smith, 1963. "Minimization of Economic Rent in Spatial Price Equilibrium," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 30(1), pages 24-31.
    28. Chao, Gary S. & Friesz, Terry L., 1984. "Spatial price equilibrium sensitivity analysis," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 423-440, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pani, Agnivesh & Sahu, Prasanta K. & Tavasszy, Lóránt & Mishra, Sabya, 2023. "Freight activity-travel pattern generation (FAPG) as an enhancement of freight (trip) generation modelling: Methodology and case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 34-48.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Chin W. & Hwang, Ming J. & Sohng, Soong N., 2002. "The Cournot competition in the spatial equilibrium model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 139-154, March.
    2. Joseph Chow & Choon Yang & Amelia Regan, 2010. "State-of-the art of freight forecast modeling: lessons learned and the road ahead," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 1011-1030, November.
    3. Nilesh Anand & Ron van Duin & Hans Quak & Lori Tavasszy, 2015. "Relevance of City Logistics Modelling Efforts: A Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 701-719, November.
    4. Chow, Joseph Y.J. & Ritchie, Stephen G. & Jeong, Kyungsoo, 2014. "Nonlinear inverse optimization for parameter estimation of commodity-vehicle-decoupled freight assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 71-91.
    5. Gerard Jong & Inge Vierth & Lori Tavasszy & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2013. "Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 347-371, February.
    6. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    7. Hao Wang & Linda Nozick & Ningxiong Xu & Jared Gearhart, 2018. "Modeling ocean, rail, and truck transportation flows to support policy analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 327-357, September.
    8. Hensher, David A. & Teye, Collins, 2019. "Commodity interaction in freight movement models for New South Wales," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Croson, Rachel & Gächter, Simon, 2010. "The science of experimental economics," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 122-131, January.
    10. Armin Falk, 2003. "Homo Oeconomicus versus Homo Reciprocans: Ansätze für ein neues Wirtschaftspolitisches Leitbild?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(1), pages 141-172, February.
    11. Sánchez-Díaz, Iván & Holguín-Veras, José & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2015. "A time-dependent freight tour synthesis model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 144-168.
    12. Nilesh Anand & Ron van Duin & Lori Tavasszy, 2014. "Ontology-based multi-agent system for urban freight transportation," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 133-153, July.
    13. Chorus, Caspar & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Daniel, Aemiro Melkamu & Sandorf, Erlend Dancke & Sobhani, Anae & Szép, Teodóra, 2021. "Obfuscation maximization-based decision-making: Theory, methodology and first empirical evidence," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 28-44.
    14. Innocenti, Alessandro, 2010. "How a psychologist informed economics: The case of Sidney Siegel," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 421-434, June.
    15. Nuzzo, Simone & Morone, Andrea, 2017. "Asset markets in the lab: A literature review," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 42-50.
    16. Chris Starmer, 1999. "Experiments in economics: should we trust the dismal scientists in white coats?," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30.
    17. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    18. Usman Ahmed & Matthew J. Roorda, 2023. "Joint and sequential models for freight vehicle type and shipment size choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 1613-1629, October.
    19. Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2017. "Investigating the potential for off-hour deliveries in the city of Rome: Retailers’ perceptions and stated reactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 142-156.
    20. Daniel Kaszubowski, 2019. "A Method for the Evaluation of Urban Freight Transport Models as a Tool for Improving the Delivery of Sustainable Urban Transport Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:2:p:489-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.