IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v41y2007i9p1050-1066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Real time simulation of auctioning and re-scheduling processes in hybrid freight markets

Author

Listed:
  • van Duin, J.H.R.
  • Tavasszy, L.A.
  • Taniguchi, E.

Abstract

In the freight logistics business, supply chains are under strong pressure to provide customized goods and services. Individualized product deliveries, modifications in product specification, late orders and volume changes need to be accommodated within strict delivery time frames. This uncertainty in demand can only be accommodated by allowing for slack capacity and time in trip planning. As this overbooking creates substantial costs, however, firms will attempt to minimize these costs by further optimizing and re-organizing their distribution channels. In this paper we look at the feasibility of one such solution, a hybrid system of contracting freight carrying services. Here, part of the services are provided by various carriers using contracts for a fixed base volume of freight, which results in planned delivery tours. Additional to these volumes, peaks resulting from additional shipments are accommodated by one or more of these carriers within an auction setting based on price and quality of service. The additional freight is won by the carrier that has the most flexible trip planning in terms of capacity, service quality and costs. We test the effectiveness and efficiency of this contracting system by means of a simultaneous, real time simulation of the execution of planned tours, the auctioning process and the re-scheduling of tours. The model provides us with new insights on the dynamics of bidding behaviour on the side of carriers and shippers.

Suggested Citation

  • van Duin, J.H.R. & Tavasszy, L.A. & Taniguchi, E., 2007. "Real time simulation of auctioning and re-scheduling processes in hybrid freight markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1050-1066, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:1050-1066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(07)00036-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olli Bräysy & Michel Gendreau, 2002. "Tabu Search heuristics for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 10(2), pages 211-237, December.
    2. Bulow, Jeremy & Klemperer, Paul, 1996. "Auctions versus Negotiations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(1), pages 180-194, March.
    3. Song, Jiongjiong & Regan, Amelia, 2005. "Approximation algorithms for the bid construction problem in combinatorial auctions for the procurement of freight transportation contracts," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 914-933, December.
    4. Ajit Kambil & Eric van Heck, 1998. "Reengineering the Dutch Flower Auctions: A Framework for Analyzing Exchange Organizations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Bob Thompson, 2008. "Liveability," ERES eres2008_275, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    6. Regan, A C & Song, Jiongjiong, 2003. "Combinatorial Auctions for Transportation Service Procurement: The Carrier Perspective," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7sq003mj, University of California Transportation Center.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guo, Chaojie & Thompson, Russell G. & Foliente, Greg & Kong, Xiang T.R., 2021. "An auction-enabled collaborative routing mechanism for omnichannel on-demand logistics through transshipment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Biswajit Sarkar & Muhammad Tayyab & Seok-Beom Choi, 2018. "Product Channeling in an O2O Supply Chain Management as Power Transmission in Electric Power Distribution Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    3. José Holguín-Veras & Ning Xu & Miguel Jaller & John Mitchell, 2016. "A Dynamic Spatial Price Equilibrium Model of Integrated Urban Production-Transportation Operations Considering Freight Delivery Tours," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 489-519, May.
    4. Lai, Minghui & Cai, Xiaoqiang & Hu, Qian, 2017. "An iterative auction for carrier collaboration in truckload pickup and delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 60-80.
    5. Sam Heshmati & Jannes Verstichel & Eline Esprit & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2019. "Alternative e-commerce delivery policies," EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(3), pages 217-248, September.
    6. Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Perboli, Guido & Rosano, Mariangela, 2018. "Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: a taxonomy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 401-418.
    7. Li, Hongqi & Zhang, Lu & Lv, Tan & Chang, Xinyu, 2016. "The two-echelon time-constrained vehicle routing problem in linehaul-delivery systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 169-188.
    8. Dellbrügge, Marius & Brilka, Tim & Kreuz, Felix & Clausen, Uwe, 2022. "Auction design in strategic freight procurement," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 295-325, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    9. Kafle, Nabin & Zou, Bo & Lin, Jane, 2017. "Design and modeling of a crowdsource-enabled system for urban parcel relay and delivery," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 62-82.
    10. Sánchez-Díaz, Iván & Holguín-Veras, José & Ban, Xuegang (Jeff), 2015. "A time-dependent freight tour synthesis model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 144-168.
    11. Gerard Jong & Inge Vierth & Lori Tavasszy & Moshe Ben-Akiva, 2013. "Recent developments in national and international freight transport models within Europe," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 347-371, February.
    12. Park, Arim & Chen, Roger & Cho, Soohyun & Zhao, Yao, 2023. "The determinants of online matching platforms for freight services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Lafkihi, Mariam & Pan, Shenle & Ballot, Eric, 2019. "Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 348-365.
    14. Rezaei, Jafar & Hemmes, Alexander & Tavasszy, Lori, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 95-105.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hammami, Farouk & Rekik, Monia & Coelho, Leandro C., 2019. "Exact and heuristic solution approaches for the bid construction problem in transportation procurement auctions with a heterogeneous fleet," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 150-177.
    2. Ronald M. Harstad & Aleksandar Saša Pekeč, 2008. "Relevance to Practice and Auction Theory: A Memorial Essay for Michael Rothkopf," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 367-380, October.
    3. Mesa-Arango, Rodrigo & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2013. "Benefits of in-vehicle consolidation in less than truckload freight transportation operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 113-125.
    4. Garrido, Rodrigo A., 2007. "Procurement of transportation services in spot markets under a double-auction scheme with elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(9), pages 1067-1078, November.
    5. Mesa-Arango, Rodrigo & Ukkusuri, Satish V., 2015. "Demand clustering in freight logistics networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 36-51.
    6. Lafkihi, Mariam & Pan, Shenle & Ballot, Eric, 2019. "Freight transportation service procurement: A literature review and future research opportunities in omnichannel E-commerce," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 348-365.
    7. Hammami, Farouk & Rekik, Monia & Coelho, Leandro C., 2021. "Exact and hybrid heuristic methods to solve the combinatorial bid construction problem with stochastic prices in truckload transportation services procurement auctions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 204-229.
    8. Xu, Su Xiu & Huang, George Q., 2013. "Transportation service procurement in periodic sealed double auctions with stochastic demand and supply," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 136-160.
    9. Huang, George Q. & Xu, Su Xiu, 2013. "Truthful multi-unit transportation procurement auctions for logistics e-marketplaces," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 127-148.
    10. Gansterer, Margaretha & Hartl, Richard F. & Sörensen, Kenneth, 2020. "Pushing frontiers in auction-based transport collaborations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Schmitz, Patrick W., 2003. "On second-price auctions and imperfect competition," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 901-909, November.
    12. Boone, J., 2003. "Optimal Competition : A Benchmark for Competition Policy," Discussion Paper 2003-3, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Yuen Leng Chow & Isa E. Hafalir & Abdullah Yavas, 2015. "Auction versus Negotiated Sale: Evidence from Real Estate Sales," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 43(2), pages 432-470, June.
    14. Walter Beckert, 2004. "Dynamic Monopolies with Stochastic Demand," Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance 0404, Birkbeck, Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics.
    15. Jehiel, Philippe & Lamy, Laurent, 2014. "On discrimination in procurement auctions," CEPR Discussion Papers 9790, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Fluck, Zsuzsanna & John, Kose & Ravid, S. Abraham, 2007. "Privatization as an agency problem: Auctions versus private negotiations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 2730-2750, September.
    17. Jacob K. Goeree & Theo Offerman, 2003. "Competitive Bidding in Auctions with Private and Common Values," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(489), pages 598-613, July.
    18. Ronald M. Harstad, 2007. "Does a Seller Really Want Another Bidder?," Working Papers 0711, Department of Economics, University of Missouri.
    19. Yongmin Chen & Ruqu Wang, 2004. "Equilibrium Selling Mechanisms," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 5(2), pages 335-355, November.
    20. Vladimirov, Vladimir, 2021. "Financing Skilled Labor," CEPR Discussion Papers 15751, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:41:y:2007:i:9:p:1050-1066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.