IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8107-d422546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Transportation Network Paradox: Consideration of Travel Time and Health Damage due to Pollution

Author

Listed:
  • Zhaolin Cheng

    (Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Huashan Rd., Shanghai 200030, China
    Business School, Huzhou University, 759 Erhuandong Rd., Huzhou 313000, China)

  • Laijun Zhao

    (Business School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd., Shanghai 200093, China)

  • Huiyong Li

    (Sino-US Global Logistics Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 1954 Huashan Rd., Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

In cities with serious air pollution, travel time and health damage significantly affect route choice by travelers (e.g., motorcycle and scooter drivers). Consequently, the classical Braess paradox is no longer realistic because it only considers the traveler’s value of time (VOT). In the current study, we describe a new transportation network paradox that considers both the VOT and the traveler’s perception of pollution damage. To examine the conditions that create the new paradox, we developed a novel method to compute a total comprehensive cost that combines the VOT with health damage. We analyzed the conditions for the new paradox and the system’s performance using a user equilibrium model and system optimization. Furthermore, an improved model is used to analyze how different transport modes influence the Braess paradox. We found that whether the new paradox occurs and the potential improvement of the system’s performance depend on whether the total travel demand falls within critical ranges. The bounds of these ranges depend on the values of the parameters in the function that describes the health damage and the link travel time function. In addition, high health damage significantly affects route choices and traffic flow distribution. This paper presents a new perspective for decision-making by transportation planners and for route choices in cities with serious air pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhaolin Cheng & Laijun Zhao & Huiyong Li, 2020. "A Transportation Network Paradox: Consideration of Travel Time and Health Damage due to Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8107-:d:422546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanna, Rema & Oliva, Paulina, 2015. "The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 68-79.
    2. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "An analysis of logit and weibit route choices in stochastic assignment paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-49.
    3. Dafermos, Stella & Nagurney, Anna, 1984. "On some traffic equilibrium theory paradoxes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 101-110, April.
    4. Lin, Boqiang & Xu, Mengmeng, 2018. "Regional differences on CO2 emission efficiency in metallurgical industry of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 302-311.
    5. W. Y. Szeto & Xiaoqing Jaber & S. C. Wong, 2012. "Road Network Equilibrium Approaches to Environmental Sustainability," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 491-518, April.
    6. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    7. Jiang, Y. & Szeto, W.Y., 2016. "Reliability-based stochastic transit assignment: Formulations and capacity paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 181-206.
    8. Olumide F. Abioye & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Junayed Pasha & Masoud Kavoosi, 2019. "A Vessel Schedule Recovery Problem at the Liner Shipping Route with Emission Control Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Charles Raux & Yves Croissant & Damien Pons, 2015. "Would personal carbon trading reduce travel emissions more effectively than a carbon tax?," Post-Print halshs-01099917, HAL.
    10. (Walker) Wang, Wei & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Feng, Zengzhe & Wu, Jianjun, 2016. "Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 95-114.
    11. Wei-Hua Lin & Hong K. Lo, 2009. "Investigating Braess' Paradox with Time-Dependent Queues," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 117-126, February.
    12. Apparicio, Philippe & Gelb, Jérémy & Carrier, Mathieu & Mathieu, Marie-Ève & Kingham, Simon, 2018. "Exposure to noise and air pollution by mode of transportation during rush hours in Montreal," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 182-192.
    13. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    14. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    15. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2018. "Braess paradox in a network with stochastic dynamics and fixed strategies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 507(C), pages 133-152.
    16. Pas, Eric I. & Principio, Shari L., 1997. "Braess' paradox: Some new insights," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 265-276, June.
    17. Chunxue Zhao, 2014. "Dynamic Traffic Network Model and Time-Dependent Braess’ Paradox," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-7, November.
    18. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai & Sarvi, Majid & Asadi, Mohsen, 2019. "Is it time to go for no-car zone policies? Braess Paradox Detection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 251-264.
    19. J. Lelieveld & J. S. Evans & M. Fnais & D. Giannadaki & A. Pozzer, 2015. "The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7569), pages 367-371, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomasz Rokicki & Grzegorz Koszela & Luiza Ochnio & Kamil Wojtczuk & Marcin Ratajczak & Hubert Szczepaniuk & Konrad Michalski & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska, 2021. "Diversity and Changes in Energy Consumption by Transport in EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Papaix, Claire & Eranova, Mariya & Zhou, Li, 2023. "Shared mobility research: Looking through a paradox lens," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 156-167.
    3. Yuqing Geng & Mukasar Maimaituerxun & Han Zhang, 2022. "Coordinated interactions between economy and atmospheric environment: temporal–spatial comparisons from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13887-13916, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Wei (Walker) & Wang, David Z.W. & Zhang, Fangni & Sun, Huijun & Zhang, Wenyi & Wu, Jianjun, 2017. "Overcoming the Downs-Thomson Paradox by transit subsidy policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-147.
    2. Yao, Jia & Huang, Wenhua & Chen, Anthony & Cheng, Zhanhong & An, Shi & Xu, Guangming, 2019. "Paradox links can improve system efficiency: An illustration in traffic assignment problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 35-49.
    3. Yao, Jia & Chen, Anthony, 2014. "An analysis of logit and weibit route choices in stochastic assignment paradox," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 31-49.
    4. Ashraf, Muhammad Hasan & Chen, Yuwen & Yalcin, Mehmet G., 2022. "Minding Braess Paradox amid third-party logistics hub capacity expansion triggered by demand surge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. (Walker) Wang, Wei & Wang, David Z.W. & Sun, Huijun & Feng, Zengzhe & Wu, Jianjun, 2016. "Braess Paradox of traffic networks with mixed equilibrium behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 95-114.
    6. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & (Avi) Ceder, Avishai & Sarvi, Majid & Asadi, Mohsen, 2019. "Is it time to go for no-car zone policies? Braess Paradox Detection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 251-264.
    7. Bittihn, Stefan & Schadschneider, Andreas, 2021. "The effect of modern traffic information on Braess’ paradox," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 571(C).
    8. Shanjiang Zhu & David Levinson & Henry Liu, 2017. "Measuring winners and losers from the new I-35W Mississippi River Bridge," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 905-918, September.
    9. Ye, Jiao & Jiang, Yu & Chen, Jun & Liu, Zhiyuan & Guo, Renzhong, 2021. "Joint optimisation of transfer location and capacity for a capacitated multimodal transport network with elastic demand: a bi-level programming model and paradoxes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Zhao, Chunxue & Fu, Baibai & Wang, Tianming, 2014. "Braess paradox and robustness of traffic networks under stochastic user equilibrium," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 135-141.
    11. Liu, Haoming & Salvo, Alberto, 2017. "Severe Air Pollution and School Absences: Longitudinal Data on Expatriates in North China," IZA Discussion Papers 11134, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Xu, Xiangdong & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K., 2015. "Modeling absolute and relative cost differences in stochastic user equilibrium problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P3), pages 686-703.
    13. Mohamed Ali Kammoun & Sadok Turki & Nidhal Rezg, 2020. "Optimization of Flight Rescheduling Problem under Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Di, Xuan & He, Xiaozheng & Guo, Xiaolei & Liu, Henry X., 2014. "Braess paradox under the boundedly rational user equilibria," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 86-108.
    15. Yang, Chao & Chen, Anthony, 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of the combined travel demand model with applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 909-921, November.
    16. Liu, Ziming & Yu, Lu, 2020. "Stay or Leave? The Role of Air Pollution in Urban Migration Choices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Barron, Manuel & Torero, Maximo, 2017. "Household electrification and indoor air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 81-92.
    18. Chen, Xiaoguang & Chen, Luoye & Xie, Wei & Mueller, Nathaniel D. & Davis, Steven J., 2023. "Flight delays due to air pollution in China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    19. Rapoport, Amnon & Kugler, Tamar & Dugar, Subhasish & Gisches, Eyran J., 2009. "Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: Experimental tests of the Braess Paradox," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 538-571, March.
    20. Yang, Siyuan & Fang, Delin & Chen, Bin, 2019. "Human health impact and economic effect for PM2.5 exposure in typical cities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 316-325.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8107-:d:422546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.