IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i8p2338-d224055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Farmers’ Willingness of Land Transfer Behavior Based on Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Haizi Wang

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jian Zhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Chaowei Li

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jian Zhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Juan Liu

    (Business School, Shandong Jian Zhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

  • Shibin Zhang

    (School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jian Zhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

In China, the current household contract responsibility system has been unable to adapt to the commercialization and marketization of rural cultivated land. Rural land transfer is allowed by the government as a supplement to the household contract responsibility system. However, in 2016, the rural land circulating in China accounted for only 35% of the total national rural land area and there were many problems with the process of land circulation. Therefore, the rural revitalization strategy in China must focus on how to promote rural land circulation with high efficiency to ensure food security in China and high quality to realize the sustainable development of rural land resources. In this study, based on the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), two structural equation models (SEM) for rural land inflow and rural land outflow were used to compare and examine the key factors affecting farmers’ intention to engage in rural land circulation in Shandong Province. Data analysed from a survey of 549 farmers showed that behavioural attitudes, subjective norms, and perceptual behavioural control have a significant impact on farmers’ intention to engage in rural land circulation, and only subjective norms had a negative impact on the land inflow intention model. Behavioural attitudes had the greatest impact in the two models, but the impact paths of the two models were different. In the rural land inflow intention model, the intrinsic value of cultivated land is important to farmers, whereas in the rural land outflow model, the economic rationality of transferring land was mainly considered. The importance of perceptual behavioural control in the rural land outflow model was greater than it was in the rural land inflow model. The results of this research can provide a reference for formulating government policies, achieving the sustainable development of land resources, and guaranteeing food supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Haizi Wang & Chaowei Li & Juan Liu & Shibin Zhang, 2019. "Research on Farmers’ Willingness of Land Transfer Behavior Based on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2338-:d:224055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/8/2338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeng, Heng & Chen, Mei-qiu & Zhou, Bing-juan, 2011. "Empirical Study on the Will of Farmland Transfer among Different Farmer Groups—a sampling survey on 42 counties and cities, 64 towns and 74 villages in Jiangxi Province," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 3(04), pages 1-5, April.
    2. Arnab K. Basu, 2002. "Oligopsonistic Landlords, Segmented Labor Markets, and the Persistence of Tied-Labor Contracts," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(2), pages 438-453.
    3. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    4. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2005. "The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 241-270, October.
    5. Ingrid Nielsen & Russell Smyth & Qingguo Zhai, 2010. "Subjective Well-Being of China’s Off-Farm Migrants," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 315-333, June.
    6. Lin, Yi-ping, 2010. "Different Characteristics of Peasant Issues from the Connections between Peasants and Land," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 2(08), pages 1-4, August.
    7. Zhang, Cen-cheng, 2011. "The Major Problems and the Governmental Role in Chinese Rural Land Transfer," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 3(07), pages 1-4, July.
    8. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing & Nagarajan, Hari K., 2008. "Efficiency and equity impacts of rural land rental restrictions: Evidence from India," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 892-918, July.
    9. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2009. "Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 22-38, May.
    10. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Carletto, Calogero, 2012. "Land Fragmentation, Cropland Abandonment, and Land Market Operation in Albania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 2108-2122.
    11. Jin, Songqing & Deininger, Klaus, 2009. "Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation: Productivity and equity impacts from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 629-646, December.
    12. Cao, Wu-Kun & Wu, De-En, 2010. "Contract System for Circulation of the Right to Rural Land Contractual Management," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 2(08), pages 1-5, August.
    13. Pender, John L. & Kerr, John M., 1999. "The effects of land sales restrictions: evidence from south India," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 279-294, December.
    14. Gwendoline Promsopha, 2015. "Land Ownership as Insurance and the Market for Land: A Study in Rural Vietnam," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 91(3), pages 460-478.
    15. Che, Yi, 2009. "Mismatch: land reallocations, recovery land rental and land rental market development in rural China," MPRA Paper 39794, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Krusekopf, Charles C., 2002. "Diversity in land-tenure arrangements under the household responsibility system in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 297-312.
    17. Yi Che, 2016. "Off-farm employments and land rental behavior: evidence from rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 8(1), pages 37-54, February.
    18. Zhang, Rui & Xiao, Hong-an & Zhang, Wen-xiu, 2011. "Influencing Factors of Householders’ Transferring out Cultivated Land under the Background of Urban and Rural Integration," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 3(03), pages 1-5, March.
    19. Gwendoline Promsopha, 2015. "Land Ownership as Insurance and the Market for Land: A study in Rural Vietnam," Post-Print hal-01189580, HAL.
    20. Jikun Huang & Liangliang Gao & Scott Rozelle, 2012. "The effect of off‐farm employment on the decisions of households to rent out and rent in cultivated land in China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 5-17, January.
    21. Lei, Zhanbo & Du, Haowen, 2009. "Driving Factors and Model of Change in Arable Land Area in China," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 1(05), pages 1-4, May.
    22. DING, Yumin & LING, Ye & WU, Yang, 2016. "Path Choice of Rural Land Transfer in China," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 8(07), pages 1-5, July.
    23. Kung, James Kai-sing, 2002. "Off-Farm Labor Markets and the Emergence of Land Rental Markets in Rural China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 395-414, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hanyue Li & Runqing Zhang, 2023. "How Does Perceived Value Affect Cooperative Initiatives in Agricultural Organizations: Evidence from 247 Agri-Industrialized Unions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang & Man An & Zixuan Zhang & Nanqiao He, 2023. "Unveiling the Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Low-Carbon Green Utilization of Farmland: The Roles of Farmland Transfer and Management Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Min Zhou & Hua Zhang & Zixuan Zhang & Hanxiaoxue Sun, 2023. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Cultivated Land Transfer and Cultivated Land Green Utilization Efficiency: An Empirical Study from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Zhansheng Li & Qiying Yang & Xuchao Yang & Zutao Ouyang & Xiumin Cai & Jiaguo Qi, 2022. "Assessing Farmers’ Attitudes towards Rural Land Circulation Policy Changes in the Pearl River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    2. Zhang, Jian & Mishra, Ashok K. & Ma, Xianlei, 2023. "Mechanism of Chinese farmers’ land rental participation: The role of invisible markets and public intervention," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Kai Huang & Xin Deng & Yi Liu & Zhuolin Yong & Dingde Xu, 2020. "Does off-Farm Migration of Female Laborers Inhibit Land Transfer? Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, January.
    4. Han Zhang & Jari Kuuluvainen & Youliang Ning & Wenmei Liao & Can Liu, 2017. "Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    5. Hengzhou Xu & Yihang Zhao & Ronghui Tan & Hongchun Yin, 2017. "Does the Policy of Rural Land Rights Confirmation Promote the Transfer of Farmland in China?," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 67(4), pages 643-672, December.
    6. Han Zhang & Jari Kuuluvainen & Hongqiang Yang & Yi Xie & Can Liu, 2017. "The Effect of Off-Farm Employment on Forestland Transfers in China: A Simultaneous-Equation Tobit Model Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Zhang, Jian & Mishra, Ashok K. & Hirsch, Stefan, 2021. "Market-oriented agriculture and farm performance: Evidence from rural China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Lijing Zhang & Mingyong Hong & Xiaolin Guo & Wenrong Qian, 2022. "How Does Land Rental Affect Agricultural Labor Productivity? An Empirical Study in Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, April.
    9. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    10. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    11. Wen, Le & Paudel, Krishna P. & He, Qinying, 2023. "Temporary migration and land renting behavior," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1372-1391.
    12. Ying Liu & Chenggang Wang & Zeng Tang & Zhibiao Nan, 2017. "Farmland Rental and Productivity of Wheat and Maize: An Empirical Study in Gansu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Li, Xinyi & Ito, Junichi, 2021. "An empirical study of land rental development in rural Gansu, China: The role of agricultural cooperatives and transaction costs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    14. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Xia, Fang, 2017. "Smallholders’ land access in Sub-Saharan Africa: A new landscape?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 78-92.
    15. Jianyun Hou & Xuexi Huo & Runsheng Yin, 2017. "Land Rental Market Participation and Its Impact on Fixed Investment and Household Welfare: Evidence from Chinese Apple Production Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, October.
    16. Wenjing Han & Zhengfeng Zhang & Xiaoling Zhang & Li He, 2021. "Farmland Rental Participation, Agricultural Productivity, and Household Income: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    17. Aryal, Jeetendra P. & Holden, Stein T., 2011. "Caste Discrimination, Land Reforms and Land Market Performance in Nepal," CLTS Working Papers 1/11, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Land Tenure Studies, revised 10 Oct 2019.
    18. Zhang, L., 2018. "Can large-scale farmland transfer improve agricultural productivity? Evidence from rural Jiangsu, P.R. China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275918, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Ying Liu & Chenggang Wang & Zeng Tang & Zhibiao Nan, 2019. "Does Farmland Rental Contribute to Reduction of Agrochemical Use? A Case of Grain Production in Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Jian Zhang & Ashok K. Mishra & Peixin Zhu, 2021. "Land rental markets and labor productivity: Evidence from rural China," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 93-115, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:2338-:d:224055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.