IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6914-d1127800.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Perceived Value Affect Cooperative Initiatives in Agricultural Organizations: Evidence from 247 Agri-Industrialized Unions

Author

Listed:
  • Hanyue Li

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Runqing Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

Abstract

In China, an effective form of agricultural organization called an agri-industrialized union (AIU) has been on the rise and is recognized as making a great contribution to rural revitalization. However, individual AIUs appear to be conducted in different ways during their development. Some are successfully operated by active members in cohesive combinations, while some fail because of disconnection and instability. The purpose of this study is to encourage all members to take initiative and to act cooperatively to ensure high-quality resource usage in AIUs. Based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the theory of perceived value, a structural equation model was used to examine the main factors affecting members’ willingness to cooperate in AIUs in Hebei Province. The data collected from a survey of 247 AIUs indicated that behavioral attitudes and subjective norms have a direct impact on cooperative initiatives. Perceived behavioral control indirectly affects cooperative initiatives. Perceived management ability influences subjective norms, while perceived interest–risk influences behavioral attitudes and perceived behavioral control, especially in hierarchical governance groups. The influences of behavioral attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms are stronger in mixed-governance groups. The results of this research can provide recommendations for policymaking that may help to ensure the stable development of AIUs and rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanyue Li & Runqing Zhang, 2023. "How Does Perceived Value Affect Cooperative Initiatives in Agricultural Organizations: Evidence from 247 Agri-Industrialized Unions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6914-:d:1127800
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6914/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6914/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Young-Jae Kim & E-Sack Kim, 2021. "Analysis of Korean Fencing Club Members’ Participation Intention Using the TPB Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Siu-cheung Chan & Ming-te Lu, 2004. "Understanding Internet Banking Adoption and Use Behavior: A Hong Kong Perspective," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 21-43, July.
    4. Chao Wu & Shuling Liang & Weijiong Wu & Yuxiang Hong, 2021. "Practicing Green Residence Business Model Based on TPB Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-11, July.
    5. Haizi Wang & Chaowei Li & Juan Liu & Shibin Zhang, 2019. "Research on Farmers’ Willingness of Land Transfer Behavior Based on Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    6. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    7. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    8. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    2. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Cowan, Kelly R. & Daim, Tugrul U., 2011. "Review of technology acquisition and adoption research in the energy sector," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 183-199.
    4. Chia-Chien Hsu & Brian Sandford & Chia-Ju Ling & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Can the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Help Explain Subjective Well-Being in Senior Citizens due to Gateball Participation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Sanjeev Verma, 2015. "Harnessing the Benefit of Social Networking Sites for Intentional Social Action: Determinants and Challenges," Vision, , vol. 19(2), pages 104-111, June.
    6. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    7. Chua Chang Jin & Lim Chee Seong & Aye Aye Khin, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Consumer Acceptance towards Fintech Products and Services in Malaysia," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(1), pages 59-65, January.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    9. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    10. Tsen-Yao Chang & Yu-Chieh Chiu, 2021. "The Academic Portfolio System (APS) Usage Intention of Senior High School Students in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Taneja, Shilpa & Ali, Liaqat, 2021. "Determinants of customers’ intentions towards environmentally sustainable banking: Testing the structural model," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Urvashi Tandon & Ravi Kiran & Ash N. Sah, 2018. "The influence of website functionality, drivers and perceived risk on customer satisfaction in online shopping: an emerging economy case," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 57-91, February.
    13. Masud Rana & Gazi Md. Shakhawat Hossain & Maruf Hasan, 2020. "Effectiveness of entrepreneurship skill development training – A case study at RUDSETI in Chitradurga District, Karnataka," Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, Educational Research Multimedia & Publications,India, vol. 11(3), pages 30-44, September.
    14. Song, Jinzhu & Drennan, Judy C. & Andrews, Lynda M., 2012. "Exploring regional differences in Chinese consumer acceptance of new mobile technology: A qualitative study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 80-88.
    15. Jaydeep Mukherjee, 2016. "A comprehensive framework for adoption of mobile broadband services in Indian cities," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(1), pages 9-25, January.
    16. Aftab Pervez Khan & Shahnawaz Khan & Ivan Ang Ri Xiang, 2017. "Factors Influencing Consumer Intentions to Adopt Online Banking in Malaysia," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(2), pages 101-134, June.
    17. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    18. Alraja, Mansour, 2022. "Frontline healthcare providers’ behavioural intention to Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled healthcare applications: A gender-based, cross-generational study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    19. Jing Li & Chia-Chien Hsu & Ching-Torng Lin, 2019. "Leisure Participation Behavior and Psychological Well-Being of Elderly Adults: An Empirical Study of Tai Chi Chuan in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Pookulangara, Sanjukta & Koesler, Kristian, 2011. "Cultural influence on consumers' usage of social networks and its' impact on online purchase intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 348-354.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6914-:d:1127800. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.