IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v170y2022ics0301421522004724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Producer services development and manufacturing carbon intensity: Evidence from an international perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Zhida
  • Li, Zheng
  • Yang, Mian

Abstract

Reducing the carbon intensity of manufacturing is pivotal to meeting international carbon reduction targets aimed at mitigating global warming. This paper originally investigates the implications of producer services development (PSD) on the carbon intensity of manufacturing. We first evolved an approach to quantify the indirect role of producer services in reducing the carbon intensity of manufacturing. Empirical tests are then carried out using data from 18 manufacturing sectors in 42 countries from 2000 to 2014. The results demonstrate that domestic PSD reduces the carbon intensity of manufacturing sectors, but this effect is significant only in the sectors with high embedment of producer services, both domestic and foreign producer services. By deeply embedded in manufacturing, the development of producer services improves the energy structure and energy efficiency of the manufacturing sector, thereby reducing its carbon intensity. In addition, among producer services, the development and embedment of the information and communication sector has a more pronounced impact on reducing the carbon intensity of manufacturing. Our findings are informative and insightful for coordinating inter-sector development and implementing climate change mitigation measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Zhida & Li, Zheng & Yang, Mian, 2022. "Producer services development and manufacturing carbon intensity: Evidence from an international perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:170:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522004724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421522004724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Okushima, Shinichiro & Tamura, Makoto, 2010. "What causes the change in energy demand in the economy?: The role of technological change," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 41-46, September.
    3. Zhang, Zhongxiang, 2000. "Decoupling China's Carbon Emissions Increase from Economic Growth: An Economic Analysis and Policy Implications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 739-752, April.
    4. Joseph Francois & Miriam Manchin & Patrick Tomberger, 2015. "Services Linkages and the Value Added Content of Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1631-1649, November.
    5. Aichele, Rahel & Heiland, Inga, 2018. "Where is the value added? Trade liberalization and production networks," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 130-144.
    6. Sun, Hongye & Kim, Giseung, 2021. "The composite impact of ICT industry on lowering carbon intensity: From the perspective of regional heterogeneity," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Zhong, Mei-Rui & Cao, Meng-Yuan & Zou, Han, 2022. "The carbon reduction effect of ICT: A perspective of factor substitution," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    8. Castellacci, Fulvio, 2008. "Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6-7), pages 978-994, July.
    9. Markusen, James R, 1989. "Trade in Producer Services and in Other Specialized Intermediate Inputs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(1), pages 85-95, March.
    10. Eswaran, Mukesh & Kotwal, Ashok, 2002. "The role of the service sector in the process of industrialization," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 401-420, August.
    11. Beverelli, Cosimo & Fiorini, Matteo & Hoekman, Bernard, 2017. "Services trade policy and manufacturing productivity: The role of institutions," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 166-182.
    12. Eric Williams, 2011. "Environmental effects of information and communications technologies," Nature, Nature, vol. 479(7373), pages 354-358, November.
    13. Dietzenbacher, Erik & Pei, Jiansuo & Yang, Cuihong, 2012. "Trade, production fragmentation, and China's carbon dioxide emissions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 88-101.
    14. Sun, Chuanwang & Li, Zhi & Ma, Tiemeng & He, Runyong, 2019. "Carbon efficiency and international specialization position: Evidence from global value chain position index of manufacture," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 235-242.
    15. Shandre M. Thangavelu & Wenxiao Wang & Sothea Oum, 2018. "Servicification in global value chains: Comparative analysis of selected Asian countries with OECD," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(11), pages 3045-3070, November.
    16. Liu, Xuepeng & Mattoo, Aaditya & Wang, Zhi & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2020. "Services development and comparative advantage in manufacturing," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    17. Kim, Pyung & Bae, Hyunhoe, 2022. "Do firms respond differently to the carbon pricing by industrial sector? How and why? A comparison between manufacturing and electricity generation sectors using firm-level panel data in Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    18. Cainelli, Giulio & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2013. "Environmental innovations in services: Manufacturing–services integration and policy transmissions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1595-1604.
    19. Yang, Mian & Wang, En-Ze & Hou, Yaru, 2021. "The relationship between manufacturing growth and CO2 emissions: Does renewable energy consumption matter?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Tamazian, Artur & Chousa, Juan Piñeiro & Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, 2009. "Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: Evidence from BRIC countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 246-253, January.
    21. Zhu, Bangzhu & Jiang, Minxing & Wang, Kefan & Chevallier, Julien & Wang, Ping & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2018. "On the road to China's 2020 carbon intensity target from the perspective of “double control”," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 377-387.
    22. Yu, Yantuan & Zhang, Ning, 2021. "Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    23. Jun Yang & Maigeng Zhou & Zhoupeng Ren & Mengmeng Li & Boguang Wang & De Li Liu & Chun-Quan Ou & Peng Yin & Jimin Sun & Shilu Tong & Hao Wang & Chunlin Zhang & Jinfeng Wang & Yuming Guo & Qiyong Liu, 2021. "Projecting heat-related excess mortality under climate change scenarios in China," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    24. Tian, Kailan & Dietzenbacher, Erik & Yan, Bingqian & Duan, Yuwan, 2020. "Upgrading or downgrading: China's regional carbon emission intensity evolution and its determinants," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    25. Xu, Xin & Huang, Shupei & An, Haizhong, 2021. "Identification and causal analysis of the influence channels of financial development on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    26. Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei & Kunfu Zhu, 2013. "Quantifying International Production Sharing at the Bilateral and Sector Levels," NBER Working Papers 19677, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    27. Glass, Amy Jocelyn & Saggi, Kamal, 2001. "Innovation and wage effects of international outsourcing," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 67-86, January.
    28. Fernandes, Ana M. & Paunov, Caroline, 2012. "Foreign direct investment in services and manufacturing productivity: Evidence for Chile," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 305-321.
    29. Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2010. "Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains," NBER Working Papers 16426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luyang Tang & Bangke Lu & Tianhai Tian, 2023. "The Effect of Input Digitalization on Carbon Emission Intensity: An Empirical Analysis Based on China’s Manufacturing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Guo & Liu, Yishuang & Gao, Qizheng & Zhang, Jianqing, 2023. "Does regional services development enhance manufacturing firm productivity? A manufacturing servitization perspective," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 451-466.
    2. Zhao, Yuhuan & Liu, Ya & Qiao, Xiaoyong & Wang, Song & Zhang, Zhonghua & Zhang, Yongfeng & Li, Hao, 2018. "Tracing value added in gross exports of China: Comparison with the USA, Japan, Korea, and India based on generalized LMDI," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 24-44.
    3. Boya Zhang & Shukuan Bai & Yadong Ning & Tao Ding & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Emission Embodied in International Trade and Its Responsibility from the Perspective of Global Value Chain: Progress, Trends, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    4. Liu, Xuepeng & Mattoo, Aaditya & Wang, Zhi & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2020. "Services development and comparative advantage in manufacturing," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. Bruno Casella & Richard Bolwijn & Daniel Moran & Keiichiro Kanemoto, . "Improving the analysis of global value chains: the UNCTAD-Eora Database," UNCTAD Transnational Corporations Journal, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    6. Congxin Li & Xu Zhang, 2022. "The Influencing Mechanisms on Global Industrial Value Chains Embedded in Trade Implied Carbon Emissions from a Higher-Order Networks Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-38, November.
    7. Zauresh Atakhanova & Peter Howie, 2020. "Metal intensity of use in the era of global value chains," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 101-113, July.
    8. Miguel Angel Esquivias Padilla, & Dyah Wulan Sari, & Rossanto Dwi Handoyo, 2017. "Formation of production networks in ASEAN: Measuring the real value-added and identifying the role of ASEAN countries in the world supply chains," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(2), pages 237-255, May.
    9. Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci & Carlo Pietrobelli, 2018. "Opening and linking up: firms, GVCs, and productivity in Latin America," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 917-935, April.
    10. João Amador & Sónia Cabral, 2017. "Networks of Value-added Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(7), pages 1291-1313, July.
    11. Woori Lee, 2019. "Services liberalization and global value chain participation: New evidence for heterogeneous effects by income level and provisions," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 888-915, August.
    12. Arjan Lejour & Hugo Rojas-Romagosa & Paul Veenendaal, 2017. "Identifying hubs and spokes in global supply chains using redirected trade in value added," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 66-81, January.
    13. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    14. Jean Baliè & Davide Del Prete & Emiliano Magrini & Pierluigi Montalbano & Silvia Nenci, 2017. "Agriculture and Food Global Value Chains in Sub-Saharan Africa: Does bilateral trade policy impact on backward and forward participation?," Working Papers 03/2017, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Feb 2017.
    15. Yan, Yunfeng & Wang, Ran & Zheng, Xiuxiu & Zhao, Zhongxiu, 2020. "Carbon endowment and trade-embodied carbon emissions in global value chains: Evidence from China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    16. Rodrigo Morales-López & Luis Quintana-Romero & Nam Kwon Mun & Inhye Oh, 2023. "Examining the Bilateral Relationship between Mexico and South Korea through the Trade in Value-Added Perspective, 2000–2021," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-24, July.
    17. Xu, Xueliu & Wang, Qian & Ran, Chenyang & Mu, Mingjie, 2021. "Is burden responsibility more effective? A value-added method for tracing worldwide carbon emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    18. Thomas Farole, 2016. "Factory Southern Africa?," World Bank Publications - Reports 23787, The World Bank Group.
    19. Dazhong Cheng & Zhiguo Xiao, 2021. "Producer Services and Productivity: A Global Value Chain Perspective," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 418-444, June.
    20. Wenzheng Liu & Yadong Ning & Shukuan Bai & Boya Zhang, 2023. "The Impact of Trade on Carbon Emissions and Employment from the Perspective of Global Value Chains—A Case Study of Chinese–Japanese–Korean Trade," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:170:y:2022:i:c:s0301421522004724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.