1. Paul Beaudry & Michel Poitevin, 1995. "Contract Renegotiation: A Simple Framework and Implications for Organization Theory," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 302-35, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
   Other versions:
   • Beaudry, P. & Poitevin, M., 1993. "Contract Renegotiation: A Simple Framework and Implications for Organization Theory," Cahiers de recherche 9332, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
2. Sappington, David, 1983. "Limited liability contracts between principal and agent," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-21, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
3. Palmer, Karen & Oates, Wallace E & Portney, Paul R, 1995. "Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 119-32, Fall. [Downloadable!] (restricted)

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Giovanni Cespa & Giacinta Cestone, 2002. "Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders," Economics Working Papers 634, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Giovanni Cespa & Giacinta Cestone, 2002. "Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 528.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC). [Downloadable!]
2. Kriechel,Ben & Ziesemer,Thomas, 2003. "The Environmental Porter Hypothesis as a Technology Adoption Problem?," Research Memoranda 011, Maastricht : MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Kriechel,Ben & Ziesemer,Thomas, 2005. "The Environmental Porter Hypothesis as a Technology Adoption Problem?," Research Memoranda 008, Maastricht : MERIT, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology. [Downloadable!]
3. Ambec, S. & Lanoie, P., 2007. "When and why does it pay to be green ?," Working Papers 200704, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL). [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and why does it pay to be green?," Cahiers de recherche 07-04, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée. [Downloadable!]
   • Paul Lanoie & Stefan Ambec & Iain Scott, 2007. "When and Why Does it Pay to be Green?," CIRANO Burgundy Reports 2007rb-03, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
   • Stefan Ambec & Paul Lanoie, 2007. "When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-20, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
4. Marklund, Per-Olov, 2004. "Essays on Productive Efficiency, Shadow Prices, and Human Capital. PhD Thesis," UmeÃ¥ Economic Studies 621, Umeå University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
5. Ziesemer, Thomas & Kriechel, Ben, 2006. "Taxation and Technology Adoption: A Hotelling Approach," UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 009, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and social Research and training centre on Innovation and Technology. [Downloadable!]
6. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent-Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2007. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 07-06, HEC Montréal, Institut d'économie appliquée. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Lanoie, P. & Laurent-Lucchetti, L. & Johnstone, N. & Ambec, S., 2007. "Environmental policy, innovation and performance : new insights on the Porter hypothesis," Working Papers 200706, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL). [Downloadable!]
   • Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent-Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2007. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," CIRANO Working Papers 2007s-19, CIRANO. [Downloadable!]
7. David Popp, 2005. "Uncertain R&D and the Porter Hypothesis," Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy, Berkeley Electronic Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1423-1423. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
8. Petr Hanel, 2003. "Impact of innovation motivated by environmental concerns and government regulations on firm performance: a study of survey data," Cahiers de recherche 03-09, Departement d'Economique de la Faculte d'administration à l'Universite de Sherbrooke. [Downloadable!]
9. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 0505, GREEN. [Downloadable!]
   Other versions:
   • Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis," Cahiers de recherche 0505, Université Laval - Département d'économique. [Downloadable!]
10. Philippe Barla & Christos Constantatos & Markus Herrmann, 2008. "Environmental Regulation as a Coordination Device for the Introduction of a Green Product: The Porter’s Hypothesis Revisited," Discussion Paper Series 2008_04, Department of Economics, University of Macedonia, revised May 2008. [Downloadable!]
11. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2001. "Productivité et réglementation environnementale: une analyse de l'hypothèse de Porter," Cahiers de recherche 0104, GREEN. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2001. "Productivité et réglementation environnementale: une analyse de l'hypothèse de Porter," Cahiers de recherche 0107, Université Laval - Département d'économique. [Downloadable!]
12. Théophile, AZOMAHOU & Raouf, BOUCEKKINE & Phu, NUYEN VAN, 2003. "Energy consumption, technological progress and economic policy," Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Discussion Paper 2003025, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES). [Downloadable!]
13. Francisco J. André & Paula González & Nicolás Porteiro, 2007. "Strategic Quality Competition and the Porter Hypothesis," Working Papers 07.03, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Departamento de Economía. [Downloadable!]
14. Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Quand la réglementation environmentale profite aux polleurs. Survol des fondements théoriques de l'hypothèse de Porter," Cahiers de recherche 0504, GREEN. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
    • Ambec, Stefan & Barla, Philippe, 2005. "Quand la réglementation environmentale profite aux pollueurs. Survol des fondements théoriques de l'hypothèse de Porter," Cahiers de recherche 0504, Université Laval - Département d'économique. [Downloadable!]