IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/sae/pubfin/v30y2002i3p163-187.html

The Demand for Local Public Goods: The Case of Public School Quality

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Brasington, D. M., 2003. "The supply of public school quality," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 367-377, August.
  2. David M. Brasington & Diane Hite, 2005. "Demand for Environmental Quality: A Spatial Hedonic Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2005-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
  3. Noel D. Campbell & Frank Smith, 2009. "Merit-Based Scholarship ``Over-Awards'' and Home Prices," Public Finance Review, , vol. 37(2), pages 198-216, March.
  4. David Brasington, 2005. "School Choice and the Flight to Private Schools: To What Extent Are Public and Private Schools Substitutes?," Departmental Working Papers 2005-02, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
  5. Zaizhou Hu & Zengdong Cao & Anran Du & Qin Tu, 2025. "Where does it matter? Revisiting the role of proximity in knowledge spillovers," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 84(2), pages 297-322, March.
  6. David Brasington & Don Haurin, 2005. "Capitalization of Parent, School, and Peer Group Components of School Quality into House Price," Departmental Working Papers 2005-04, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
  7. Song, Zisheng, 2021. "The capitalization of school quality in rents in the Beijing housing market: A propensity score method," Working Paper Series 21/7, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Real Estate and Construction Management & Banking and Finance.
  8. John Yinger, 2009. "Hedonic Markets and Explicit Demands: Bid-Function Envelopes for Public Services, Neighborhood Amenities, and Commuting Costs," Center for Policy Research Working Papers 114, Center for Policy Research, Maxwell School, Syracuse University.
  9. repec:jpe:journl:679 is not listed on IDEAS
  10. Yinger, John, 2015. "Hedonic markets and sorting equilibria: Bid-function envelopes for public services and neighborhood amenities," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 9-25.
  11. Henry Kinnucan & Yuqing Zheng & Gerald Brehmer, 2006. "State Aid and Student Performance: A Supply-Demand Analysis," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 487-509.
  12. Brasington, David M. & Haurin, Donald R., 2009. "Parents, peers, or school inputs: Which components of school outcomes are capitalized into house value?," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 523-529, September.
  13. Huixin Zheng & Nicholas Marantz & Jae Hong Kim & John R. Hipp, 2024. "Dissolving Districts: Did Property Values Fall When California Terminated Its Redevelopment Agencies?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 38(4), pages 215-234, November.
  14. Dongwon Lee, 2016. "Supermajority rule and bicameral bargaining," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 53-75, October.
  15. David Brasington & Donald R. Haurin, 2006. "Educational Outcomes and House Values: A Test of the value added Approach," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 245-268, May.
  16. Jae Hong Kim & Francesca Pagliara & John Preston, 2005. "The Intention to Move and Residential Location Choice Behaviour," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(9), pages 1621-1636, August.
  17. Dongwon Lee & Dongil Kim & Thomas E. Borcherding, 2013. "Tax Structure and Government Spending: Does the Value-Added Tax Increase the Size of Government?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 66(3), pages 541-570, September.
  18. Lubna Naz & Abdul Salam Lodhi & Daniel W. Tsegai, 2020. "Parents’ Perception of Education and Choice of Childhood Activities: Evidence from Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 59(3), pages 335-355.
  19. David Brasington & Don Haurin, 2005. "The Demand for Educational Quality: Comparing Estimates from a Median Voter Model with those from an Almost Ideal Demand System," Departmental Working Papers 2005-16, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
  20. Dongwon Lee, 2015. "Supermajority rule and the law of 1/n," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 251-274, September.
  21. Pedro de Araujo & Kate Cheng, 2017. "Do Preferences For Amenities Differ Among Home Buyers? A Hedonic Price Approach," Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 165-184, November.
  22. Stadelmann, David, 2010. "Which factors capitalize into house prices? A Bayesian averaging approach," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 180-204, September.
  23. Sedgley, Norman H. & Williams, Nancy A. & Derrick, Frederick W., 2008. "The effect of educational test scores on house prices in a model with spatial dependence," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 191-200, June.
  24. Brasington, David M. & Hite, Diane, 2005. "Demand for environmental quality: a spatial hedonic analysis," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 57-82, January.
  25. Jae-Hong Kim & Francesca Pagliara & John Preston, 2003. "An Analysis of Residential Location Choice Behaviour in Oxfordshire, Uk: A Combined Stated Preference Approach," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 103-114, July.
  26. Brasington, David M., 2002. "Edge versus center: finding common ground in the capitalization debate," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 524-541, November.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.