IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/transe/v95y2016icp1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

A Generalized Nash Equilibrium network model for post-disaster humanitarian relief

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Anna Nagurney & Min Yu & Deniz Besik, 2017. "Supply chain network capacity competition with outsourcing: a variational equilibrium framework," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 231-254, September.
  2. Nagurney, Anna & Salarpour, Mojtaba & Daniele, Patrizia, 2019. "An integrated financial and logistical game theory model for humanitarian organizations with purchasing costs, multiple freight service providers, and budget, capacity, and demand constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 212-226.
  3. Anna Nagurney & Pritha Dutta, 2019. "Supply chain network competition among blood service organizations: a Generalized Nash Equilibrium framework," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 551-586, April.
  4. Tatsuya Hirano & Yasushi Narushima, 2019. "Robust Supply Chain Network Equilibrium Model," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1196-1212, July.
  5. Claudia Paciarotti & Inna Valiakhmetova, 2021. "Evaluating Disaster Operations Management: An Outcome‐Process Integrated Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 543-562, February.
  6. Anna Nagurney & Mojtaba Salarpour & June Dong & Ladimer S. Nagurney, 2020. "A Stochastic Disaster Relief Game Theory Network Model," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 1-33, June.
  7. Jianfang Shao & Changyong Liang & Xihui Wang & Xiang Wang & Liang Liang, 2020. "Relief Demand Calculation in Humanitarian Logistics Using Material Classification," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
  8. Cook, Robert A. & Lodree, Emmett J., 2017. "Dispatching policies for last-mile distribution with stochastic supply and demand," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 353-371.
  9. Zhou, Yan & Chan, Chi Kin & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A multi-period supply chain network equilibrium model considering retailers’ uncertain demands and dynamic loss-averse behaviors," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 51-76.
  10. Nagurney, Anna & Besik, Deniz & Li, Dong, 2019. "Strict quotas or tariffs? Implications for product quality and consumer welfare in differentiated product supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 136-161.
  11. Xuehong Gao, 2022. "A bi-level stochastic optimization model for multi-commodity rebalancing under uncertainty in disaster response," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 115-148, December.
  12. Fathalikhani, Somayeh & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan & Soltani, Roya, 2020. "Government intervention on cooperation, competition, and coopetition of humanitarian supply chains," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  13. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
  14. Rajak, Sonu & Mathiyazhagan, K. & Agarwal, Vernika & Sivakumar, K. & Kumar, Vikas & Appolloni, Andrea, 2022. "Issues and analysis of critical success factors for the sustainable initiatives in the supply chain during COVID- 19 pandemic outbreak in India: A case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
  15. Jessica Rodríguez‐Pereira & Burcu Balcik & Marie‐Ève Rancourt & Gilbert Laporte, 2021. "A Cost‐Sharing Mechanism for Multi‐Country Partnerships in Disaster Preparedness," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(12), pages 4541-4565, December.
  16. Jimoh Eniola Olaogbebikan & Richard Oloruntoba, 2019. "Similarities between disaster supply chains and commercial supply chains: a SCM process view," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 517-542, December.
  17. Nagurney, Anna & Dutta, Pritha, 2019. "Competition for blood donations," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 103-114.
  18. Sara Rye & Emel Aktas, 2022. "A Multi-Attribute Decision Support System for Allocation of Humanitarian Cluster Resources Based on Decision Makers’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
  19. Gossler, Timo & Wakolbinger, Tina & Nagurney, Anna & Daniele, Patrizia, 2019. "How to increase the impact of disaster relief: A study of transportation rates, framework agreements and product distribution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 126-141.
  20. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2018. "A dynamic equilibrium model of the oligopolistic closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain and time-dependent demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 325-354.
  21. Diehlmann, Florian & Lüttenberg, Markus & Verdonck, Lotte & Wiens, Marcus & Zienau, Alexander & Schultmann, Frank, 2020. "Public-private collaborations in emergency logistics: A framework based on logistical and game-theoretical concepts," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 53, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
  22. Salarpour, Mojtaba & Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "A multicountry, multicommodity stochastic game theory network model of competition for medical supplies inspired by the Covid-19 pandemic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
  23. Rodolfo Modrigais Strauss Nunes & Susana Carla Farias Pereira, 2022. "Intellectual structure and trends in the humanitarian operations field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1099-1157, December.
  24. Timperio, Giuseppe & Kundu, Tanmoy & Klumpp, Matthias & de Souza, Robert & Loh, Xiu Hui & Goh, Kelvin, 2022. "Beneficiary-centric decision support framework for enhanced resource coordination in humanitarian logistics: A case study from ASEAN," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
  25. Nagurney, Anna, 2021. "Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(3), pages 880-891.
  26. Seyed Reza Abazari & Fariborz Jolai & Amir Aghsami, 2022. "Designing a humanitarian relief network considering governmental and non-governmental operations under uncertainty," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(3), pages 1430-1452, June.
  27. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
  28. Shuvrangshu Jana & Rudrashis Majumder & Prathyush P. Menon & Debasish Ghose, 2022. "Decision Support System (DSS) for Hierarchical Allocation of Resources and Tasks for Disaster Management," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 1-30, September.
  29. Shao, Jianfang & Fan, Yu & Wang, Xihui & Liang, Changyong & Liang, Liang, 2023. "Designing a new framework agreement in humanitarian logistics based on deprivation cost functions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
  30. Doan, Xuan Vinh & Shaw, Duncan, 2019. "Resource allocation when planning for simultaneous disasters," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 687-709.
  31. Rodica Ioana Lung & Noémi Gaskó & Mihai Alexandru Suciu, 2020. "Pareto-based evolutionary multiobjective approaches and the generalized Nash equilibrium problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 561-584, August.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.