IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Characterization of domains admitting nondictatorial social welfare functions and nonmanipulable voting procedures"

by Kalai, Ehud & Muller, Eitan

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Simone Tonin, 2014. "Nondictatorial Arrovian Social Welfare Functions An Integer Programming Approach," Working Papers 2014_13, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
  2. Kalai, Ehud & Ritz, Zvi, 1980. "Characterization of the private alternatives domains admitting arrow social welfare functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 23-36, February.
  3. Clemens Puppe & Attila Tasnádi, 2008. "Nash implementable domains for the Borda count," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 367-392, October.
  4. Salvador Barberà & Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno, 2011. "Two Necessary Conditions for Strategy-Proofness: on What Domains are they also Sufficient?," Working Papers 598, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  5. repec:dgr:uvatin:2006022 is not listed on IDEAS
  6. Schummer, James & Vohra, Rakesh V., 2002. "Strategy-proof Location on a Network," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 405-428, June.
  7. Perote-Pena, Juan & Piggins, Ashley, 2005. "Pareto efficiency with spatial rights," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 265-283, April.
  8. Bochet Olivier & Storcken Ton, 2006. "Maximal Domains for Strategy-Proof or Maskin Monotonic Choice Rules," Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  9. Berga, Dolors & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2000. "Maximal Domain for Strategy-Proof Rules with One Public Good," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 39-61, January.
  10. Ching, Stephen & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 1998. "A Maximal Domain for the Existence of Strategy-Proof Rules," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 157-166, January.
  11. Sato, Shin, 2013. "A sufficient condition for the equivalence of strategy-proofness and nonmanipulability by preferences adjacent to the sincere one," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 259-278.
  12. Geslin, Stephanie & Salles, Maurice & Ziad, Abderrahmane, 2003. "Fuzzy aggregation in economic environments: I. Quantitative fuzziness, public goods and monotonicity assumptions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 155-166, April.
  13. Manimay Sen, 1984. "Strategy-proofness of a class of Borda rules," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 251-285, January.
  14. Ehud Kalai & Eitan Muller & Mark Satterthwaite, 1979. "Social welfare functions when preferences are convex, strictly monotonic, and continuous," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 87-97, March.
  15. Barbera, Salvador & Sonnenschein, Hugo & Zhou, Lin, 1991. "Voting by Committees," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 595-609, May.
  16. Bochet Olivier & Storcken Ton, 2006. "Maximal Domains for Strategy-Proof or Maskin Monotonic Choice Rules," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  17. R. Pablo Arribillaga & Jordi Massó, 2014. "Comparing Generalized Median Voter Schemes According to their Manipulability," Working Papers 753, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
  18. Sethuraman, Jay & Teo, Chung-Piaw & Vohra, Rakesh V., 2006. "Anonymous monotonic social welfare functions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 232-254, May.
  19. Mark A. Satterthwaite & Hugo Sonnenschein, 1979. "Strategy-Proof Allocation Mechanisms," Discussion Papers 395, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  20. Cato, Susumu, 2009. "Another induction proof of the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(3), pages 239-241, December.
  21. Kim Border, 1984. "An impossibility theorem for spatial models," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 293-305, January.
  22. Keisuke Sato & Yoshitsugu Yamamoto, 2006. "A Study on Linear Inequality Representation of Social Welfare Functions," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 06-022/1, Tinbergen Institute.
  23. Teo Chung Piaw & Jay Sethuraman & Rakesh V. Vohra, 2001. "Integer Programming and Arrovian Social Welfare Functions," Discussion Papers 1316, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  24. Ehud Kalai, 1976. "Social Welfare Functions When Preferences are Convex and Continuous: Impossibility Results," Discussion Papers 236, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  25. Pierre Batteau & Jean-Marie Blin, 1976. "On Group Manipulability of Voting Procedures," Discussion Papers 242, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  26. Olivier Bochet & Ton Storcken, 2008. "Maximal Domains for Strategy-proof or Maskin Monotonic Choice Rules," Diskussionsschriften dp0901, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
  27. Pierre Batteau, 1978. "Stability of Aggregation Procedures, Ultrafilters and Simple Games," Discussion Papers 318, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  28. Storcken Ton, 2008. "Collective Choice Rules on Convex Restricted Domains," Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
  29. Ehud Kalai & Zvi Ritz, 1978. "An Extended Single Peak Condition in Social Choice," Discussion Papers 325, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
  30. Francesca Busetto & Giulio Codognato & Simone Tonin, 2014. "Integer Programming on Domains Containg Inseparable Ordered Pairs," Working Papers 2014_14, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.