IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jetheo/v148y2013i3p1122-1149.html

Large games with a bio-social typology

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. , & , P. & , & ,, 2015. "Strategic uncertainty and the ex-post Nash property in large games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), January.
  2. Guilherme Carmona & Konrad Podczeck, 2022. "Approximation and characterization of Nash equilibria of large games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 679-694, April.
  3. Wei He & Yeneng Sun, 2018. "Conditional expectation of correspondences and economic applications," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(2), pages 265-299, August.
  4. Qiao, Lei & Yu, Haomiao, 2014. "On the space of players in idealized limit games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 177-190.
  5. Wu, Bin, 2022. "On pure-strategy Nash equilibria in large games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 305-315.
  6. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2022. "Conditional expectation of Banach valued correspondences and economic applications," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
  7. Qiao, Lei & Yu, Haomiao & Zhang, Zhixiang, 2016. "On the closed-graph property of the Nash equilibrium correspondence in a large game: A complete characterization," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 89-98.
  8. Fu, Haifeng & Yu, Haomiao, 2015. "Pareto-undominated and socially-maximal equilibria in non-atomic games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 7-15.
  9. Jian Yang, 2023. "Nonatomic game with general preferences over returns," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 52(3), pages 861-889, September.
  10. Łukasz Balbus & Paweł Dziewulski & Kevin Reffett & Łukasz Woźny, 2015. "Differential information in large games with strategic complementarities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 59(1), pages 201-243, May.
  11. Barelli, Paulo & Duggan, John, 2015. "Extremal choice equilibrium with applications to large games, stochastic games, & endogenous institutions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 95-130.
  12. M. Ali Khan & Yongchao Zhang, 2017. "Existence of pure-strategy equilibria in Bayesian games: a sharpened necessity result," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 167-183, March.
  13. Khan, M. Ali & Rath, Kali P. & Yu, Haomiao & Zhang, Yongchao, 2013. "Large distributional games with traits," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 502-505.
  14. Khan, Mohammed Ali & Rath, Kali P. & Yu, Haomiao & Zhang, Yongchao, 2017. "On the equivalence of large individualized and distributionalized games," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
  15. Yang, Jian, 2025. "A nonatomic game involving incomplete information and general ambiguity attitudes," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
  16. Rabah Amir, 2019. "Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economic Theory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(3), pages 487-496, April.
  17. Chen, Enxian & Wu, Bin & Xu, Hanping, 2025. "Equilibrium convergence in large games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
  18. He, Wei & Sun, Xiang & Sun, Yeneng, 2017. "Modeling infinitely many agents," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
  19. Guilherme Carmona & Konrad Podczeck, 2025. "Large incomplete-information games with independent types," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 54(1), pages 1-17, June.
  20. Wu, Bin & Xu, Hanping, 2022. "Pareto-undominated and socially-maximal Nash equilibria with coarser traits," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
  21. Yang, Jian, 2022. "A Bayesian nonatomic game and its applicability to finite-player situations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
  22. Motoki Otsuka, 2025. "Graphon games and an idealized limit of large network games," Papers 2504.01944, arXiv.org.
  23. Fang, Chuyi & Wu, Bin, 2019. "Socially-maximal Nash equilibrium distributions in large distributional games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 40-42.
  24. Carmona, Guilherme & Podczeck, Konrad, 2020. "Pure strategy Nash equilibria of large finite-player games and their relationship to non-atomic games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
  25. Khan, M. Ali & Yu, Haomiao & Zhang, Zhixiang, 2015. "On the centipede game with a social norm," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 16-19.
  26. Jian Yang, 2017. "A link between sequential semi-anonymous nonatomic games and their large finite counterparts," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 383-433, May.
  27. Alfio Giarlotta & M. Ali Khan & Angelo Enrico Petralia & Francesco Reito, 2026. "The Effects of Social Pressure on Fundamental Choices: Indecisiveness and Deferral," Papers 2602.14631, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
  28. Sun, Xiang & Zeng, Yishu, 2020. "Perfect and proper equilibria in large games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 288-308.
  29. Fu, Haifeng & Wu, Bin, 2019. "Characterization of Nash equilibria of large games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 46-51.
  30. Ennio Bilancini & Leonardo Boncinelli, 2016. "Strict Nash equilibria in non-atomic games with strict single crossing in players (or types) and actions," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 4(1), pages 95-109, April.
  31. Sun, Xiang & Sun, Yeneng & Yu, Haomiao, 2020. "The individualistic foundation of equilibrium distribution," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.