IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/122005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Promoting the multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry, and rural areas - design and implementation of public policies in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Lehmann, Paul
  • Schleyer, Christian
  • Wüstemann, Henry
  • Drechsler, Martin
  • Hagedorn, Konrad
  • Wätzold, Frank

Abstract

The multiple roles and functions of agriculture and forestry beyond those of supplying food and fibre, such as the provision of environmental benefits and the contribution to the socio-economic viability of rural areas, account for a growing recognition in both scientific debates and political decision making. In order to foster further research in the field of multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry, and rural areas, this report provides an overview of the scientific work that has been done with respect to the different ways and goals of setting up and management of public policies with multifunctional purpose. It particularly focuses on policies that have been implemented in Germany since 1992. Initially, a description of traditional policies for multifunctionality that have been initiated at EU, national, Laender, regional, and local level is provided. This includes, among other things, the EU Rural Development Regulations, the LEADER initiatives, the Flora-Fauna-Habitats Directive and Federal State and Laender legislation on protected areas. For each policy presented, apart from their content, important characteristics with regard to their setting up and implementation, such as responsibilities for and processes of goal determination, policy and measure design, and administrative implementation are presented. Subsequently, policies are introduced that particularly aim at creating new markets and services. Furthermore, innovative approaches are presented which involve new institutional arrangements for the provision of goods and services. Based on this presentation, the scientific debate on the design and implementation of policies with multifunctional purpose is sketched out. Five major strands of debates dealing with issues of setting up and management of those policies are highlighted: First, scientific literature is reflected that discusses issues regarding the allocation of property rights and the related question of applying standards, such as GFP, or incentive based policies. Second, light is shed on the scientific debate on the appropriate degree of centralisation and decentralisation, respectively. Third, directions of the discussion on policy and scheme design are considered. Fourth, the closely related issues of acceptance and demand of policies are highlighted. Fifth, questions of monitoring and enforcement are addressed. Finally, the main research gaps are highlighted. Outstanding and promising issues include the research on optimal institutional arrangements of property rights and matching forms of governance as well as interdisciplinary work on policies other than agri-environmental schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehmann, Paul & Schleyer, Christian & Wüstemann, Henry & Drechsler, Martin & Hagedorn, Konrad & Wätzold, Frank, 2005. "Promoting the multifunctionality of agriculture, forestry, and rural areas - design and implementation of public policies in Germany," UFZ Discussion Papers 12/2005, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:122005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45185/1/489068529.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scheele, Martin, 1993. "Raumwirksamkeit der Umweltpolitik als Kriterium subsidiärer Kompetenzverteilung," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73(8), pages 424-430.
    2. Thoroe, Carsten, 2001. "Kompetenzverteilung in der Agrarpolitik in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(03), pages 1-6.
    3. Knickel, Karlheinz, 2001. "Möglichkeiten zur Umsetzung integrierter Fördermaßnahmen an der Schnittstelle Landwirtschaft, Umwelt, Ländliche Entwicklung im Rahmen der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1257/99," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(03), pages 1-6.
    4. Urfei, Guido, 2002. "Regionale Verteilung von Schutzgebieten in Deutschland - Eine empirisch gestützte Bewertung der räumlichen Implikationen des Natur- und Landschaftsschutzes per Ordnungsrecht," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-10.
    5. Plankl, R, 1997. "Maßnahmen zur Förderung umweltgerechter und den natürlichen Lebensraum schützender landwirtschaftlicher Produktionsverfahren gem. VO EWG 2078-92," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 46(03).
    6. Urfei, Guido, 1999. "Agrarumweltpolitik nach den Prinzipien der Ökonomischen Theorie des Föderalismus: Ein Regionalisierungsansatz zur territorialen Abgrenzung effizienter Politikaktionsräume," RWI Schriften, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, volume 66, number 66.
    7. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2004. "Agri-Environmental Policy in Germany: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Discussion Papers 18832, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    8. Nellinger, Ludwig, 1996. "Zur Weiterentwicklung der EU-Agrarreform unter einkommens-, markt- und umweltpolitischen Gesichtspunkten (Teil 1)," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 45(08-09).
    9. Raue, Petra, 2001. "Ex-post Bewertung des LEADER II-Programms Schleswig-Holstein 1994-1999," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 08/2001, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    10. Ahrens, Heinz & Lippert, Christina, 2000. "Erwiderung: Überlegungen zu Umwelt- und Einkommenswirkungen von Agrarumweltprogrammen nach VO (EWG) Nr. 2078/92 in der Landwirtschaft," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 49(11).
    11. Johst, Karin & Drechsler, Martin & Watzold, Frank, 2002. "An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 37-49, April.
    12. Uwe Latacz‐Lohmann & Carel P. C. M. Van der Hamsvoort, 1998. "Auctions as a Means of Creating a Market for Public Goods from Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 334-345, September.
    13. Lampkin, Nicolas & Padel, Susanne & Foster, Carolyn, 2001. "Entwicklung und politische Rahmenbedingungen des ökologischen Landbaus in Europa," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(07), pages 1-5.
    14. Baudoux, Patrick, 2001. "Beurteilung von Agrarumweltprogrammen - eine einzelbetriebliche Analyse in Baden-Württemberg und Nordbrandenburg," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(04), pages 1-13.
    15. Osterburg, Bernhard & Stratmann, Ursula, 2002. "Die regionale Agrarumweltpolitik in Deutschland unter dem Einfluss der Förderangebote der Europäischen Union," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-21.
    16. Nieberg, Hiltrud, 2001. "Unterschiede zwischen erfolgreichen und weniger erfolgreichen Ökobetrieben in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(07), pages 1-5.
    17. Henrichsmeyer, Wilhelm, 1998. "Beurteilung der Vorschläge der Agenda 2000 zur Weiterentwicklung der Agrarpolitik aus gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(12).
    18. Rudloff, Bettina, 2002. "Agrarumweltpolitik nach dem Subsidiaritätsprinzip - Föderalismustheoretische Grundlagen zur Politikgestaltung," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(05), pages 1-10.
    19. Schmitz, P. Michael, 2002. "Halbzeitbewertung der Agenda 2000: Chancen und Risiken von Fischlers Reformkurs," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(06), pages 1-3.
    20. Mehl, Peter & Plankl, Reiner, 2001. "„Doppelte Politikverflechtung“ als Bestimmungsfaktor der Agrarstruktur- und der Agrarumweltpolitik in der BR Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 50(03), pages 1-5.
    21. Balmann, Alfons & Lotze, Herrmann & Noleppa, Steffen, 1998. "Agrarsektormodellierung auf der Basis typischer Betriebe, Teil 2," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(06).
    22. Nellinger, Ludwig, 1996. "Zur Weiterentwicklung der EU-Agrarreform unter einkommens-, markt- und umweltpolitischen Gesichtspunkten (Teil 2)," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 45(10).
    23. Eggers, K J & Hagedorn, Konrad, 1998. "Umwelteffekte und agrarumweltpolitische Ansätze der Agenda 2000," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(12).
    24. Ahlheim, Michael & Fror, Oliver, 2003. "Valuing the non-market production of agriculture," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 52(08), pages 1-14.
    25. Ungern-Sternberg Thomas von, 2001. "Die Vorteile des Staatsmonopols in der Gebäudeversicherung: Erfahrungen aus Deutschland und der Schweiz," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 31-44, February.
    26. Frank Wätzold & Martin Drechsler, 2005. "Spatially Uniform versus Spatially Heterogeneous Compensation Payments for Biodiversity-Enhancing Land-Use Measures," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 31(1), pages 73-93, May.
    27. Exler, Kathrin, 2002. "Steuerung der Landnutzung durch Raumplanung: Instrumente und Kooperationsprobleme zwischen Landwirtschaft und Naturschutz," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(06), pages 1-13.
    28. Balmann, Alfons & Lotze, Herrmann & Noleppa, Steffen, 1998. "Agrarsektormodellierung auf der Basis typischer Betriebe, Teil 1," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 47(05).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2005. "Agri-Environmental Policy: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24496, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2004. "Agri-Environmental Policy in Germany: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," Institutional Change in Agriculture and Natural Resources Discussion Papers 18832, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Rothe, Andrea & Lissitsa, Alexej, 2005. "Der ostdeutsche Agrarsektor im Transformationsprozess: Ausgangssituation, Entwicklung und Problembereiche [Agricultural sector of Eastern Germany during transition period – Initial situation, devel," IAMO Discussion Papers 81, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
    5. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons, 2002. "Struktur-, Effizienz- und Einkommenswirkungen von Direktzahlungen," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(08), pages 1-13.
    6. Wätzold, Frank & Drechsler, Martin, 2014. "Agglomeration payment, agglomeration bonus or homogeneous payment?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 85-101.
    7. Ahrens, H. & Bernhardt, F., 2000. "Modellierung von Wirkungen alternativer umweltpolitischer Szenarien auf die Landwirtschaft – Regional differenzierte Fallstudie für den Freistaat Sachsen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 36.
    8. Balmann, A. & Happe, K. & Kellermann, K. & Kleingarn, A., 2001. "Agricultural policy switchings – an agent-based approach," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    9. Ohl, C. & Drechsler, M. & Johst, K. & Wätzold, F., 2008. "Compensation payments for habitat heterogeneity: Existence, efficiency, and fairness considerations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 162-174, September.
    10. Kathrin Happe & Alfons Balmann & Konrad Kellermann, 2003. "Structural, efficiency and income effects of direct payments: an analysis of different payment schemes for the German region 'Hohenlohe'," Others 0308001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Happe, Kathrin & Balmann, Alfons, 2003. "Structural, Efficiency And Income Effects Of Direct Payments - An Agent-Based Analysis Of Alternative Payment Schemes For The German Region Of Hohenlohe," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25920, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Bamière, Laure & David, Maia & Vermont, Bruno, 2013. "Agri-environmental policies for biodiversity when the spatial pattern of the reserve matters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 97-104.
    13. Drechsler, Martin & Grimm, Volker & Mysiak, Jaroslav & Watzold, Frank, 2007. "Differences and similarities between ecological and economic models for biodiversity conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 232-241, April.
    14. Eggers, J. & Mettepenningen, E. & Beckmann, V., 2008. "Assessing the Efficienc of Local Action Groups and Auctions for Designing and Implenting Agri-Environmental Measures in the EU – Results from an Expert Survey," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    15. Sahrbacher, Christoph, 2011. "Regional structural change in European agriculture: Effects of decoupling and EU accession," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 60, number 60.
    16. Happe, Kathrin & Kellermann, Konrad & Balmann, Alfons & Sahrbacher, Christoph, 2005. "Decoupling Is not Equal to Decoupling: Structural, Income and Efficiency Effects of Different Ways to Decouple Direct Payments," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 40, March.
    17. Schrader, Jörg-Volker, 1998. "Agrarpolitische Irrwege zur Bewahrung von Bodenrenten? Von Butterbergen zu Ökotälern," Kiel Discussion Papers 325, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    18. Ramanovich, Mikhail, 2010. "Zur Bestimmung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit des weißrussischen Milchsektors: Aussagefähigkeit von Wettbewerbsindikatoren und Entwicklung eines kohärenten Messungskonzepts," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 53, number 94739.
    19. Eggers, Jorg & Mettepenningen, Evy & Beckmann, Volker, 2007. "Assessing The Efficiency Of Local Action Groups And Auctions For Designing And Implementing Agri-Environmental Measures In The Eu - Results From An Expert Survey," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7584, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Wätzold, Frank & Lienhoop, Nele & Drechsler, Martin & Settele, Josef, 2008. "Estimating optimal conservation in the context of agri-environmental schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 295-305, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Multifunctionality; agricultural policy; rural area; agri-environmental policies; Germany; review;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:122005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.