IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ufzdps/12000.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nicht-erneuerbare Massenressourcen zwischen Dematerialisierung, Transmaterialisierung und globaler Umweltbelastung: Eine empirische Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Messner, Frank

Abstract

Gegenstand dieses Beitrages ist die empirische Analyse von globalen Trends in der Nutzung von nicht-erneuerbaren Massenressourcen. Es werden im wesentlichen fünf Ergebnisse herausgearbeitet. 1. Die globale Nutzung von Massenressourcen im 20. Jahrhundert war durch enorme Zuwachsraten in der Ressourceninanspruchnahme in der zweiten Hälfte des Jahrhunderts und durch eine Stagnation im absoluten Ressourcenverbrauch in der Endphase des Jahrhunderts gekennzeichnet. 2. Bei vielen Ressourcen sind zeitlich differenzierte Prozesse einer Dematerialisierung nachweisbar, die sich im Gesamtzusammenhang eines Transmaterialisierungsprozesses konjunkturtheoretisch erklären lassen. 3. Zwischen 1960 und 1995 kann bei bedeutsamen nicht-erneuerbaren Massenressourcen ein globaler aggregierter Dematerialisierungseffekt in Höhe von mindestens 20% nachgewiesen werden. 4. Trotz der Effekte der Dematerialisierung in den Ressourcennutzungstrends und der Erfolge durch neue Umwelttechnologien im 20. Jahrhundert kann nicht ausgeschlossen werden, daß diese Prozesse mit einer erhöhten Umweltbelastung einher gingen. 5. Eine nachhaltige Transformation in der globalen Ressourcennutzung wird sich durch freie Marktprozesse nicht einstellen. Weitere Politikmaßnahmen sind dafür notwendig.

Suggested Citation

  • Messner, Frank, 2000. "Nicht-erneuerbare Massenressourcen zwischen Dematerialisierung, Transmaterialisierung und globaler Umweltbelastung: Eine empirische Analyse," UFZ Discussion Papers 1/2000, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:12000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/45207/1/310930499.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Rawahi, Khalid & Rieber, Michael, 1991. "Embodied copper : Trade, intensity of use and consumption forecasts," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 2-12, March.
    2. Humphreys, David & Briggs, Stephen, 1983. "Mineral consumption in the UK, 1945-1980 : A statistical analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 4-22, March.
    3. Lohani, Prem R. & Tilton, John E., 1993. "A cross-section analysis of metal intensity of use in the less developed countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 145-154, June.
    4. Labys, Walter C. & Waddell, Lorna M., 1989. "Commodity lifecycles in US materials demand," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 238-252, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. R.A. Greig, 1995. "Global Metal Markets: Accounting for performance (Part 1/3)," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 95-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    2. Zauresh Atakhanova & Peter Howie, 2020. "Metal intensity of use in the era of global value chains," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 33(1), pages 101-113, July.
    3. Dorothée Charlier & Florian Fizaine, 2020. "Does Becoming Richer Lead to a Reduction in Natural Resource Consumption? An Empirical Refutation of the Kuznets Material Curve," Working Papers 2020.05, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    4. Zheng, Yafei & Shao, Yanmin & Wang, Shouyang, 2017. "The determinants of Chinese nonferrous metals imports and exports," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 238-246.
    5. Rawashdeh, Rami Al & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Maxwell, Philip, 2016. "The potash market and its future prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-163.
    6. Jaunky, Vishal Chandr, 2012. "Is there a material Kuznets curve for aluminium? evidence from rich countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 296-307.
    7. Geyer, R. & Davis, J. & Ley, J. & He, J. & Clift, R. & Kwan, A. & Sansom, M. & Jackson, T., 2007. "Time-dependent material flow analysis of iron and steel in the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 101-117.
    8. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    9. Alhajji, A. F., 2002. "Hubbert's peak: the impending world oil shortage: Kenneth S. Deffeyes; Princeton University Press, 2001; 285 pp., US$24.95, hardcover, ISBN 0-691-09086-6," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 75-77.
    10. MoonJoong Tcha & Gaku Takashina, 2001. "Is World Metal Consumption in Disarray?," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 01-05, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    11. Ranganathan, Shyam & Bali Swain, Ranjula, 2014. "Analysing Mechanisms for Meeting Global Emissions Target - A Dynamical Systems Approach," Working Paper Series 2014:10, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
    12. Ziolkowska, Jadwiga R. & Ziolkowski, Bozydar, 2011. "Product generational dematerialization indicator: A case of crude oil in the global economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 5925-5934.
    13. Moore, David J. & Tilton, John E. & Shields, Deborah J., 1996. "Economic growth and the demand for construction materials," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 197-205, September.
    14. Huw McKay, 2012. "Metal intensity in comparative historical perspective: China, North Asia and the United States," Chapters, in: Ligang Song & Haimin Liu (ed.), The Chinese Steel Industry’s Transformation, chapter 2, pages 17-44, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Miranda R. Gorman & David A. Dzombak, 2019. "An Assessment of the Environmental Sustainability and Circularity of Future Scenarios of the Copper Life Cycle in the U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
    16. Zhimin Zhou & Xinyue Ye & Xiangyu Ge, 2017. "The Impacts of Technical Progress on Sulfur Dioxide Kuznets Curve in China: A Spatial Panel Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. de Bruyn, S. M. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. & Opschoor, J. B., 1998. "Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental Kuznets curves," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 161-175, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ufzdps:12000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/doufzde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.