IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/tubsem/20061.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Die Rolle der Strukturpolitik in der Europäischen Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Neheider, Susanne

Abstract

Die Strukturpolitik der Europäischen Union erfuhr seit dem Jahr 1975 eine erhebliche Ausweitung, die oft eng mit weitgehenden Integrationsschritten wie Erweiterungen oder der Verabschiedung wichtiger Verträge einherging. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeichnet die wesentlichen Entwicklungsstationen der EU-Strukturpolitik nach und zeigt auf, dass die Strukturpolitik als Kompensationsinstrument bei einstimmig von den Staats- und Regierungschefs zu treffenden Entscheidungen genutzt wird. Dies ist ein Grund für Defizite der EU-Strukturpolitik, die kurz erörtert werden. Ausgehend von diesen Defiziten und der Analyse, dass die Strukturpolitik als Kompensationsinstrument dient, entwickelte sich eine Reformdiskussion, deren unterschiedliche Richtungen nachvollzogen und bewertet werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Neheider, Susanne, 2006. "Die Rolle der Strukturpolitik in der Europäischen Integration," Discussion Papers 2006/1, Technische Universität Berlin, School of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tubsem:20061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/36394/1/508132851.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mathias Dewatripont & Francesco Giavazzi & Jürgen von Hagen & Ian Harden & Didier Baudewyns & Gérard Roland & Howard Rosenthal & André Sapir & Guido Tabellini, 1995. "Flexible integration: towards a more effective and democratic Europe," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/9541, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Tsoukalis, Loukas, 1997. "The New European Economy Revisited," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774778.
    3. Lammers, Konrad, 2005. "EU-Haushalt: Ein zukunftsweisendes Ergebnis?," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 85(12), pages 744-744.
    4. Gabrisch, Hubert & Ragnitz, Joachim, 2001. "Regionale Strukturpolitik in einer erweiterten EU: Ein Reformvorschlag," Wirtschaft im Wandel, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH), vol. 7(6), pages 143-147.
    5. Christian Weise, 2002. "How to Finance Eastern Enlargement of the EU," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 287, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    6. Heinemann, Friedrich, 1999. "Der Kompensationsfonds: Eine neue Finanzverfassung für die EU der 21+," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 79(5), pages 293-299.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oliver Fritz & Franz Sinabell, 2006. "Die Kohäsions- und Agrarpolitik im neuen Finanzrahmen der EU," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 79(11), pages 817-833, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kellermann, Kersten & Schlag, Carsten-Henning, 2005. "Eignung der liechtensteinischen volkswirtschaftlichen Gesamtrechnung als Basis für Beitragszahlungen an internationale Organisationen: Gutachten im Auftrag der Regierung des Fürstentums Liechtenstein.," KOFL Studien, Konjunkturforschungsstelle Liechtenstein (KOFL), Vaduz, volume 1, number 1.
    2. Christoph Meister & Bart Verspagen & Guntram B. Wolff, 2006. "European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?," Chapters, in: Susanne Mundschenk & Michael H. Stierle & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Iulia Traistaru-Siedschlag (ed.), Competitiveness and Growth in Europe, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. André Sapir, 2022. "Ukraine and the EU: Enlargement at a New Crossroads," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 57(4), pages 213-217, July.
    4. Oliver Pamp, 2008. "Partisan Preferences and Political Institutions: Explaining Fiscal Retrenchment in the European Union," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 8(Spring), pages 4-39.
    5. Talani, Leila Simona, 2014. "The Political Economy of Italy in the EMU: What Went Wrong?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 133-149.
    6. Cace, Corina & Cace, Sorin & Nicolaescu, Victor, 2011. "Absorption of the structural funds in Romania," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(2), pages 84-105, June.
    7. Brian Efird & Gaspare M. Genna, 2002. "Structural Conditions and the Propensity for Regional Integration," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 267-295, September.
    8. Philip Arestis & Kevin McCauley & Malcolm Sawyer, 1999. "From Common Market to Emu: A Historical Perspective of European Economic and Monetary Integration," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_263, Levy Economics Institute.
    9. Alasdair R. Young, 2001. "Extending European Cooperation: The European Union and the 'New' International Trade Agenda," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 12, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    10. André Sapir, 2011. "European Integration at the Crossroads: A Review Essay on the 50th Anniversary of Bela Balassa's Theory of Economic Integration," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1200-1229, December.
    11. Berglöf, Erik & Burkart, Mike & Friebel, Guido & Paltseva, Elena, 2012. "Club-in-the-club: Reform under unanimity," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 492-507.
    12. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1997. "Balancing positive and negative integration: The regulatory options for Europe," MPIfG Working Paper 97/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    13. Lamberte, Mario B. & Milo, Melanie S. & Pontines, Victor, 2001. "NO to ¥E$? Enhancing Economic Integration in East Asia through Closer Monetary Cooperation," Discussion Papers DP 2001-16, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    14. Schwager, Robert, 1999. "Democratisation versus accountability - should the European Parliament be given more powers?," ZEW Discussion Papers 99-45, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    15. Maria Demertzis & Jean Pisani-Ferry & André Sapir & Thomas Wieser & Guntram B. Wolff, 2018. "One size does not fit all- European integration by differentiation," Policy Briefs 27473, Bruegel.
    16. Wohlgemuth, Michael, 2011. "The boundaries of the state," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 11/3, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    17. Lammers, Konrad, 1999. "Europäische Integration und räumliche Entwicklungsprozesse: Wo bleibt die nationale Ebene?," HWWA Discussion Papers 75, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    18. Pierre Salmon, 2003. "The Assignment of Powers in an Open-ended European Union," CESifo Working Paper Series 993, CESifo.
    19. Rui Henrique Alves, 2004. "Europe: Looking for a New Model," FEP Working Papers 154, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    20. Paul LUCIAN, 2016. "Social Malfunctions At European Level," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 25(1), pages 41-48.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tubsem:20061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.