IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/mpifgd/212.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dürfen europäische Gesetze Grundfreiheiten einschränken?

Author

Listed:
  • Höpner, Martin
  • Haas, Christine

Abstract

Ist der Unionsgesetzgeber an die Grundfreiheiten gebunden? Darf er Maßnahmen, die auf mitgliedstaatlicher Ebene verbotene Beschränkungen der Binnenmarktfreiheiten wären, EU-weit harmonisieren? Und darf er mitgliedstaatliche Maßnahmen mittels Sekundärrecht autorisieren, die ansonsten in Konflikt mit den Marktfreiheiten geraten würden? In der europarechtlichen Fachliteratur gehen die Einschätzungen weit auseinander. Zur Klärung werden zwei Konfliktsequenzen analysiert: die Auseinandersetzungen um die Richtlinie zum Verbot von Tabakwerbung und um die Entsenderichtlinie einschließlich ihrer jüngsten Revision. Es zeigt sich, dass der Unionsgesetzgeber an die Grundfreiheiten gebunden ist. Es handelt sich jedoch um eine lockere Bindung mit bisher unklaren Konturen. Der europäische Gesetzgeber sollte die unklaren Grenzen des ihm zugewiesenen Ermessensspielraums offensiv und mutig testen.

Suggested Citation

  • Höpner, Martin & Haas, Christine, 2021. "Dürfen europäische Gesetze Grundfreiheiten einschränken?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 21/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/232552/1/1752548124.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seikel, Daniel, 2020. "Die Revision der Entsenderichtlinie: Wie der lange Kampf um die Wiedereinbettung exterritorialisierten Arbeitsrechtes gewonnen wurde," WSI Working Papers 212, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    2. Nassibi, Ghazaleh & Rödl, Florian & Schulten, Thorsten, 2016. "Perspektiven vergabespezifischer Mindestlöhne nach dem Regio-Post-Urteil des EuGH," WSI Policy Briefs 3, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    3. Seeliger, Martin, 2017. "Die soziale Konstruktion organisierter Interessen: Gewerkschaftliche Positionsbildung auf europäischer Ebene," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 89, number 89.
    4. Eichhorst, Werner, 2000. "Europäische Sozialpolitik zwischen nationaler Autonomie und Marktfreiheit: Die Entsendung von Arbeitnehmern in der EU," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 40, number 40.
    5. Scharpf, Fritz W., 1999. "Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch?," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 0, number sbd-1999.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Höpner, Martin, 2008. "Usurpation statt Delegation: Wie der EuGH die Binnenmarktintegration radikalisiert und warum er politischer Kontrolle bedarf," MPIfG Discussion Paper 08/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Weidner, Helmut, 2005. "Global equity versus public interest? The case of climate change policy in Germany," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Civil Society and Transnational Networks SP IV 2005-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Arnaud Lechevalier & Jan Wielgohs, 2015. "Social Europe: A Dead End," Post-Print halshs-03781863, HAL.
    4. Libman, Alexander, 2005. "Взаимодействие Государственных И Частных Структур В Интеграционных Группировах: Теоретические Подходы И Опыт Снг [Interaction of Public and Private Actors in Regional Integration Groups - Theoretic," MPRA Paper 17044, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Mayntz, Renate & Scharpf, Fritz W., 2005. "Politische Steuerung - Heute?," MPIfG Working Paper 05/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. Martin Binder & Monika Heupel, 2020. "Rising Powers, UN Security Council Reform, and the Failure of Rhetorical Coercion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 93-103, October.
    7. Weidner, Helmut, 2002. "Gemeinwohl und Nachhaltigkeit: Ein prekäres Verhältnis," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Standard-setting and Environment FS II 02-303, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Henrik Scheller & Annegret Eppler, 2014. "European Disintegration – non-existing Phenomenon or a Blind Spot of European Integration Research? Preliminary Thoughts for a Research Agenda," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 2, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    9. Höpner, Martin & Baccaro, Lucio, 2022. "Das deutsche Wachstumsmodell, 1991-2019," MPIfG Discussion Paper 22/9, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    10. Budzinski, Oliver & Eckert, Sandra, 2015. "Wettbewerb und Regulierung," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 93, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    11. Blauberger, Michael, 2008. "From negative to positive integration? European state aid control through soft and hard law," MPIfG Discussion Paper 08/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    12. Nonhoff, Martin, 2007. "Die ökonomische Bedrohung politischer Selbstbestimmung: zum Verhältnis von Demokratie und Wohlfahrtsstaat," Working papers of the ZeS 10/2007, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    13. Ines Wagner & Nathan Lillie, 2014. "European Integration and the Disembedding of Labour Market Regulation: Transnational Labour Relations at the European Central Bank Construction Site," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 403-419, March.
    14. Bjarke Refslund & Karen Jaehrling & Mathew Johnson & Aristea Koukiadaki & Trine Pernille Larsen & Christin Stiehm, 2020. "Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post‐Post‐Rüffert Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1165-1181, September.
    15. Seikel, Daniel, 2014. "Nationale Anpassungsstrategien an das Fallrecht des Europäischen Gerichtshofes: Europäisierung durch Richterrecht und innenpolitische Veto-Positionen," WSI Working Papers 189, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    16. Mayer, Sebastian, 2010. "Kollidieren die Güter? Juridische und politische Reaktionen auf Zielkonflikte internationalisierter Sicherheitspolitk," TranState Working Papers 130, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    17. Deters, Henning, 2010. "Legislating on car emissions: What drives standards in EU environmental policy?," TranState Working Papers 142, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    18. Jürgen Rüland, 2012. "The rise of “diminished multilateralism”: East Asian and European forum shopping in global governance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 255-270, March.
    19. Ines Wagner, 2015. "Rule Enactment in a Pan-European Labour Market: Transnational Posted Work in the German Construction Sector," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 692-710, December.
    20. Höpner, Martin, 2017. "The Social Progress Protocol of the ETUC: A suggestion for its future development," WSI Working Papers 208, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:mpifgd:212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mpigfde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.