IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/wsipbs/3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perspektiven vergabespezifischer Mindestlöhne nach dem Regio-Post-Urteil des EuGH

Author

Listed:
  • Nassibi, Ghazaleh
  • Rödl, Florian
  • Schulten, Thorsten

Abstract

In der Mehrzahl der Bundesländer existieren heute im Rahmen landespezifischer Vergabegesetze eigenständige Mindestlohnvorgaben, nach denen öffentliche Aufträge nur an solche Unternehmen vergeben werden dürfen, die die Zahlung dieser Mindestlohnsätze bei der Durchführung der öffentlichen Auftragsarbeiten garantieren. In seinem Urteil zum Fall "Regio Post" hat der Europäische Gerichtshof nun die Vereinbarkeit dieser Regelungen mit dem europäischen Unionsrecht bestätigt. Umso unverständlicher ist die Tatsache, dass viele Bundesländer gerade auf dem Weg sind, die vergabespezifischen Mindestlöhne wieder abzuschaffen und nur noch die Zahlung des allgemeinen gesetzlichen Mindestlohnes zu verlangen.

Suggested Citation

  • Nassibi, Ghazaleh & Rödl, Florian & Schulten, Thorsten, 2016. "Perspektiven vergabespezifischer Mindestlöhne nach dem Regio-Post-Urteil des EuGH," WSI Policy Briefs 3, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:wsipbs:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224210/1/wsi-pb03.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Höpner, Martin & Haas, Christine, 2021. "Dürfen europäische Gesetze Grundfreiheiten einschränken?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 21/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Bjarke Refslund & Karen Jaehrling & Mathew Johnson & Aristea Koukiadaki & Trine Pernille Larsen & Christin Stiehm, 2020. "Moving In and Out of the Shadow of European Case Law: the Dynamics of Public Procurement in the Post‐Post‐Rüffert Era," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(5), pages 1165-1181, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:wsipbs:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wsihbde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.